Presentation for WHO on R4, Feb 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

Presentation for WHO on R4, Feb 2004

Description:

Yes, as long as there is a reasonable rationale provided for the change ... Insufficient details provided on quality control procedures ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: tobyk
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentation for WHO on R4, Feb 2004


1
Asia Regional Meeting Siem Reap, Cambodia 21-23
April 2004 Procurement and Supply Management
(PSM) Discussion Topics and Response
2
Key questions Procurement polices with financial
implications
  • Can we include the funds from different funding
    sources for pooled procurement?
  • Yes, and this is encouraged, especially if this
    leads to increase in volume of procurement and as
    a result, a reduction in per unit cost of
    product.
  • If budget is insufficient, can we use alternative
    source of funding for the same procurement?
  • Yes
  • Can we fund technical assistance to pay WHO?
  • Yes, WHO or any other group that provides high
    quality technical assistance.
  • Do we need tax exemptions for NGOs and for small
    value of procurement?
  • Yes, in principle tax exemptions are required,
    however there may be some waivers, on a
    case-by-case basis.

3
Key questions. Operational/implementation Issues
  • Can we change suppliers, different from as
    specified in implementation letter?
  • Yes, as long as there is a reasonable rationale
    provided for the change
  • Can the PR and SRs do procurement together?
  • Yes, and this is encouraged to increase the
    volume of products purchased pooling procurement
    normally results in greater efficiency and lower
    costs.

4
Key questions. Policies and Procedures
  • Are there universal procedures for how
    procurement should be conducted or is it locally
    determined?
  • The GF operates on a principle of guidelines and
    polices and does not provide prescriptive
    operational steps. We refer to other documents
    for more details including Interagency guidelines
    for procurement, World Bank procurement
    guidelines, etc. In some countries, the GF has
    accepted WB procurement guidelines as a
    supplement to GF procurement policies
  • If an PR/SR has already been pre-qualified under
    R1 grant, then do they need to be reassessed for
    subsequent rounds for a different disease?
  • Yes another assessment will be required, although
    where there is direct overlap, the level of
    assessment may not be as thorough.

5
Key questions. PSM Plan
  • Can the outsourced management agency of the PR
    develop procurement plan (including goods and
    services)?
  • Yes, the outsourced agency can develop and the
    procurement plan on behalf of the PR. The
    procurement plan should include information on
    health products and services.
  • What is the response time of the GF from
    submission of PSM plan to approval?
  • This ranges from a few weeks to several months
    depending on the quality of the PSM plan and the
    level of details provided.
  • When do we need to modify procurement plans?
  • When there are significant changes
  • - Change in treatment protocol
  • Changes in number of people treated
  • Change in patent status
  • - Adding Technical Assistance (not previously
    requested)
  • For minor changes, such as buying 20 vs. 18
    microscopes, simply communicating this
    information to the FPM should be sufficient.

6
What are the key gaps normally discovered in the
PSM Plan?
  • Patent status of products
  • Countries response to WTO/TRIPS to access
    patented products (e.g. compulsory licensing or
    government use)
  • Product selection as per standard treatment
    guidelines (National or WHO guidelines)
  • Internal inconsistencies in PSM Plans
  • Insufficient details provided on quality
    control procedures
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com