Wood quality, drought response and potential for breeding of radiata pine in marginal rainfall areas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 57
About This Presentation
Title:

Wood quality, drought response and potential for breeding of radiata pine in marginal rainfall areas

Description:

Wood quality, drought response and potential for breeding of radiata pine in marginal rainfall areas – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: julianmo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wood quality, drought response and potential for breeding of radiata pine in marginal rainfall areas


1
Wood quality, drought response and potential for
breeding of radiata pine in marginal rainfall
areas of NSW
  • Julian Moreno
  • PhD student University of Canterbury NZ

2
Presentation outline
  • Research aims with Forests NSW
  • Importance of plantations in marginal rainfall
    areas
  • Water use and drought response, overview
  • Presentation of study and discussion of results

3
Research aims with Forests NSW
  • Research agreement UC (Prof John Walker)
    Forests NSW use of acoustics for resource
    characterization (Hume region radiata
    plantations)
  • Development of methods for measuring green
    density and moisture condition
  • Variation of green density and moisture
    condition, implications for acoustic studies
  • Influence of moisture condition and temperature
    on acoustic velocity of living trees
  • Wood quality and drought response in marginal
    areas

4
Importance of plantations in marginal rainfall
areas
  • 90 of Australia plantations are in areas with
    700 1500 mm annual rainfall (BRS 2006)
  • 1992 National Forest Policy Statement (NFPS)
    restricts conversion of native forest to
    plantations
  • Due to land availability and costs, new
    plantations are likely to be established in areas
    with 600-800 mm rainfall (BRS 2006)
  • Australia seems to be particularly vulnerable to
    global climate change (extended droughts)

5
Factors affecting tree/plantation water use
(Morris and Benyon 2005)
  • Plant
  • Size and growth rate
  • leaf area
  • sapwood area
  • root biomass
  • Drought/water stress response
  • Stomatal response
  • Xylem cavitation
  • leaf senescence
  • root mortality
  • Climate
  • Humidity
  • Solar radiation
  • Temperature
  • Wind
  • All above ? Vapour pressure deficit
    ?transpiration, stomatal response
  • Water supply
  • Rainfall, irrigation, groundwater
  • Soil
  • Texture, structure, chemistry (?storage capacity,
    hydraulic conductivity)
  • Management
  • site preparation
  • weed control
  • tree spacing
  • fertilizing
  • thinning pruning

6
Importance of sapwood area
  • Sapwood area is directly related to the stems
    water conductance ability,
  • Kstemstem water conductivity
  • SW sapwood area
  • Kswood specific conductivity
  • Slengthstem length
  • SW also affects transpiration which in turn is
    related to water balance,
  • T transpiration
  • Vsap Sap velocity
  • SW has been observed to respond more readily to
    water limitation than other physiological traits
    in stands of mature trees (Cinirella et al. 2002
    and others)

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Importance of sapwood area
  • Heartwood formation in radiata pine related to
    site and physiological drought (Harris 1954)
  • Bamber (1972) hypothesized that heartwood
    formation is a physiological mechanism for
    controlling sapwood area rather than a senescence
    effect

10
(No Transcript)
11
Xylem cavitation saturation
  • Xylem cavitation breakdown of conducting water
    columns due to pit aspiration
  • 50 pit aspiration critical sapflow disruption
    69 saturation (Harris 1954)
  • Water-conduction in radiata pine related to
    saturation percentage (Harris 1961), earlywood ?
    saturated (gt95) good conduction latewood ? sat
    65-70, high cavitation, hence poor conduction

12
(No Transcript)
13
Breeding for drought
  • Selection of physiological traits related to
    drought tolerance/resistance (Arnold et al. 2005)
  • Breeders have avoided this approach because of
    the difficulty to assess such parameters
    (long-term experiments lttree water-use is
    dynamic, climate variationgt, equipment, etc.)
    (Arnold et al. 2005)
  • However, it is well known that radiata pine
    (native populations) present natural adaptation
    to low rainfall and poor sites

14
Presentation of study and discussion of results
15
The problem (opportunity)
  • 1992 National Forest Policy Statement restricts
    conversion of native forest (good sites) to
    plantations
  • New land on optimal sites (high altitude-wet) has
    become very limited in the Hume region
  • Increase of plantation area in ex-farm land,
    including marginal rainfall sites with high
    water deficits during the dry season
  • Lack of information on the wood quality of this
    resource and the implications of marginal
    rainfall and drought

16
Methods
  • To date the study has included 85 mature (34-36
    years) and 130 young (10-11 years) trees
  • Sampling in 2 contrasting sites (altitude
    climate) i.e. optimal vs. marginal site
    location influenced by harvesting operations at
    that time
  • Mature trees included 3 different thinning
    regimes (unthinned (UT), two (T2) and three
    thinnings (T3))
  • Young trees of the marginal site included two
    previous land uses (PLU) Ex-Pasture (ExP) and
    Ex-Forest (ExF)

17
Location of study
18
Sites description
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Methods (cont..)
  • Wood quality traits 1)dynamic MOE (DMOE)
    measured by acoustic velocity (TreeTap
    DIRECTOR) and green density 2) basic density
    (BD).
  • Green density and basic density measured
    destructively (discs-wedges) and
    non-destructively (12 mm cores)
  • Drought response traits 1) sapwood area (SW) and
    2) sapwood saturation percentage (Sat) from
    wedges or 12 mm cores

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Determination of dry sapwood (DSW)
30
Results for mature trees
  • Measurements at DBH height

31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
The Marginal site presented way lower sapwood
area and greater variation across stands
35
Note the far greater variation in saturation
during summer for the marginal site
36
GD 1031 Sat 83.9
GD 1033 Sat 85.4
37
Summary of effects
  • Site exerted influence on both wood quality and
    drought traits, whereas thinning regime affected
    only DBH and wood quality
  • The marginal site observed a reduction in
    diameter (-7 to -14), and outerwood stiffness
    (-5 to -11)
  • No conclusive effect of site on basic density
  • The marginal site observed greater variation and
    reduction in sapwood area (-9 to -19) across
    stands
  • Far greater variation in saturation during summer
    for the marginal site

38
DBH Wood quality vs. Sapwood area Marginal site
- T2 trees
Highlight high variation in all traits, extreme
SW values, trees with low values of SW good WQ,
potential for breeding
39
DBH Wood quality vs. Saturation Marginal site -
T2 trees summer
Highlight high variation in all traits, very
dry-wet trees, dry trees with good WQ,
potential for breeding
40
Results for young trees
  • (To date)

41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
Summary of effects
  • Large influence of site (although note
    differences between Ex-pasture Ex-forest)
  • Increase in diameter (4 to 27) for the
    Marginal-ExP site however up to what age is this
    sustainable?
  • The marginal sites observed a downgrade in
    stiffness (-35 to -36), and basic density
    ( -7 to -8)
  • Higher variation and small reduction -yet
    statistically significant- in sapwood area for
    the marginal-ExP site
  • 24 of trees of the marginal-ExP site have
    started to develop dry sapwood area
  • Considerably lower saturation (84 vs. 75 - 78)
    and far greater saturation variability, for both
    marginal sites

49
DBH Wood quality vs. Sapwood area Marginal-ExP
site
Highlight high variation in all traits, extreme
SW values, trees with low values of SW good WQ,
potential for breeding
50
DBH Wood quality vs. Saturation Marginal-ExP
site
Highlight high variation in all traits, very
dry-wet trees, dry trees with good WQ,
potential for breeding
51
Conclusions/Main findings
52
Growth and wood quality
  • Mature trees reduction in diameter (-7 to -14),
    outerwood stiffness (-5 to -11), no conclusive
    effect on basic density
  • Young trees Increase in diameter (4 to 27) up
    to what age is this sustainable? reduction in
    stiffness (-35 to -36) reduction in basic
    density (-7 to -8)
  • Additive influence of PLU on diameter for the
    Marginal-ExP, but not on stiffness and density
    (no diff between marginal sites), so are the
    latter downgrades due to the marginal environment?

53
Drought response mature trees
  • Trees of the marginal site have responded to this
    environment by, on one hand reducing their water
    conductance capacity as expressed by sapwood area
  • On the other hand by having a much broader
    response to water stress in the dry season, as
    indicated by considerably higher saturation
    variability

54
Drought response young trees
  • Young trees havent reduced their sapwood area
    significantly, yet 24 of trees from the
    marginal-ExP present dry sapwood (too-big trees
    that cannot sustain large water-use anymore)
  • Due to the current long drought, saturation is
    approaching critical level (69), yet there are
    very wet and very dry trees confirming the
    broad response of the species to water stress in
    the marginal sites

55
Potential for breeding in the marginal sites
  • Large between-tree variation in wood quality and
    drought response traits for both mature and young
    trees
  • Existence of individuals with good growth,
    stiffness, and density and at the same time
    considerably smaller sapwood area and lower
    saturation
  • These trees may have better water-use efficiency
    and drought tolerance
  • Breeding trees with better water-use efficiency
    and drought tolerance wont affect wood quality
    (No assoc. drought traits WQ)

56
Final remarks
  • Variation in drought response traits between
    marginal sites for young trees suggests influence
    of factors other than climate, e.g. soil and
    previous land use (PLU)
  • At what extent is the downgrade in wood quality
    of young trees related to climate only and what
    is the contribution of soil-PLU?

57
Acknowledgments
  • Research agreement UC (Prof John Walker)
    Forests NSW
  • Tumut research centre, Ross Dickson, Carolyn
    Raymond, field staff
  • Hume region, Duncan Watt, Ian Cotterill and
    planning staff, Harvesting area, Field staff
  • Education NZ (NZIPR scholarship)
  • CONACYT Mexico (Doctorate scholarship)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com