Employment after Stroke - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Employment after Stroke

Description:

Another study UK= 6 (RTW) & 26 perception regarding RTW show a gap in providing ... Q of L was higher for those who did RTW ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: sandy53
Category:
Tags: employment | rtw | stroke

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Employment after Stroke


1
Employment after Stroke
  • Facilitators Barriers
  • Literature search
  • Sandy James 2007

2
Why?
  • Observation of my patient contacts
  • Conferences where employers were the problem
  • Contact from a researcher for professional
    involvement

3
  • Expertise
  • Knowledge
  • Advice
  • Support
  • And lots of encouragement!

4
Background
  • Anecdotally observationally there seemed a low
    return to work post stroke
  • Although research clinical evidence shows that
    return to work (RTW) is an important aspect of
    preserving personal social identity

5
Scoping
  • For example
  • Adult
  • Stroke, CVA, TIA
  • Work, employment, job, education
  • From 1990, reported in English, from anywhere
  • Exclusion
  • ADL, leisure

6
Abstracts
  • All were reviewed as even with specific words
    some did not cover the criteria were discarded
  • Research could be divided into four groups
  • General aspects of stroke
  • On young ischemic strokes
  • On the effects of subarachnoid haemorrhage with
    or without aneurysm
  • on specific aspects of stroke such as aphasia.

7
Employment
  • Was rarely the reason for research
  • Was used in Q of L research for questionnaires or
    interviews.
  • Some research used 14/15 yrs upwards not to use
    this research would have reduced the documents
    used further.

8
Research used.
  • Numbers in most projects small so percentage
    conclusion ? Reliability.
  • Many different assessment tools used for
    function, depression, Q of Life therefore
    difficult to compare
  • Criteria were varied

9
The Research looking at work
  • UK 37 participants identified 4 themes
  • Rehabilitation process
  • Employer
  • Social structure
  • Personal
  • Another study UK 6 (RTW) 26 perception
    regarding RTW show a gap in providing support for
    people to RTW though people value work.
  • .
  • USA methodological review re isch stroke found
    comparison studies difficult as RTW is reported
    in different populations, after diverse periods,
    using variable definitions of work stroke.
    Their conclusion was that stroke severity
    measured by ADL most robust predictor for return
    to work. (however social job characteristics
    not measured)

10
What facilitated return to work
  • Being able to walk / functional capacity /ADL
  • Preserved cognitive capacity
  • Lack of Aphasia
  • Early admission to rehabilitation work should
    be considered what ever the age (OT need to work
    with reemployment services)
  • Motivation, will
  • Being a white collar worker rather then blue
  • High school degree/qualifying for university
    entrance
  • Physical requirements of the job
  • External support
  • One to one support training
  • When benefits stopped

11
Barrier to return to work
  • Severity of Subarachnoid haemorrhage impairs
    working capacity social activity
  • Physical disability
  • Depression
  • Blue collar work
  • Executive memory impairment
  • Behavioural disturbance (frontal in sah)
  • Verbal performance IQ

12
Other findings
  • high functional recovery at 1yr didnt equate to
    return to work
  • Functional outcome better in post then ant circ
    infarcts (Norway)
  • Q of L was higher for those who did RTW
  • Functional status, employment at admission,living
    at home are a better predictor of outcome then
    age.
  • Higher relative risk of stroke found in skilled
    unskilled manual workers
  • Social factors including gender,type of
    occupation, employment system socio-economic
    background

13
Continued
  • Most research agreed that stroke location in
    ischemic strokes didnt inhibite RTW but did in
    Subarachnoid haemorrhage
  • However 2 didnt as they found that those with a
    (L) sided stroke (R infarct) were more likely to
    return to work then sided ones

14
Conclusion
  • So many different tools, research questions etc.
  • But influences are both Medical Social
  • Physical disability
  • Aphasia
  • Cognitive ability
  • Socio-economics
  • Type of previous employment
  • support from the employer / or workmates
  • The persons drivers

15
Finally
  • The unfunded research was looking to develop a
    tool which could predict potential for RTW.
  • Having done this literature search, I believe
    this is unlikely what seems obvious is the
    patient who had job specific 11 intensive
    training RTW.
  • Subarchnoid Haemorrhage may be possible to
    predict
  • While 1-1 is expensive I am not advocating it
    I believe we need a specific dedicated RTW
    service in Milton Keynes linked into the
    Neurorehabilitation Unit to give patients the
    opportunity to RTW

16
Thank you for Listening.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com