Incentive Architecture - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Incentive Architecture

Description:

Information Scent is a subjective assessment of the user. User's actions towards their goal is ... Users follow a 'scent' for the information that they desire ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: kathyf7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Incentive Architecture


1
Incentive Architecture
  • Marianne Sweeny
  • TechNet/Servers Web Team
  • April 29, 2004

2
Introduction
  • Agenda
  • Information Behavior Models
  • Emerging Trends in information architecture
  • Search
  • Where we are now
  • Where we could be?
  • incentive Architecture .. is a unifying
    coherent structure that motivates users by taking
    advantage of persuasive tactics that will make
    them take action to help them make the right
    decisions

3
Information Seeking Model
  • Dervins Sensemaking
  • Users strive to make sense of reality as they
    move through situations, time, and space
  • Users encounter gaps in their knowledge and see
    these as barriers
  • Users seek to bridge the gap and reach their
    goal (a reality that again makes sense)
  • Information is what bridges the gap (provides
    answers, advice, help, etc)
  • Users deploy various strategies to build the
    bridge over the gaps
  • Ask friends or co-workers (1 information
    resource)
  • Go to other resources (print, Web, experts)

4
Information Seeking Model
  • Bates Berrypicking
  • A typical search evolves as information is
    gathered in bits and pieces along the way
  • Query document thought revision
    extension/revision requery documentand so on
  • Searchers use a variety of techniques and
    resources
  • Sometimes they want more

5
So, Whats the Difference Between Browsing and
Searching?
  • Browsing
  • Views pages one at a time
  • Navigates sequentially through hyperlinks
  • Self-guided through site space and dependent on
    browsing cues information scent
  • Iterative depending on information found along
    the way
  • Searching
  • Initiated by entering a search query and viewing
    a list of ranked results
  • Specifics driven
  • Results deprived of context
  • Includes irrelevant results due from machine
    intervention
  • User has to know the taxonomy to be successful

6
What our own CuSat Tells Us
  • Finding things on our site is a problem for many
    of our users
  • June 1999 40 cannot find what they are looking
    for 50 of the time
  • June 2001 Devs 54 / ITPros 54 cannot find what
    they are looking for 50 of the time
  • SQL Server (FY01Q4) 44 cannot find what they
    are looking for 50 of the time
  • August 2001 (CuSat Grand Report ) 44 cannot
    find what they are looking for 50 of the time
  • April 2002 (ProdCom Functionality FY02Q4)
    Ability to find information 31 vsat / 21 dsat
  • April 2002 (CuSat SQL Server) Ability to find
    information 29 vsat / 19 dsat
  • July-Dec 2003 (CDDG Online CuSat) Frequency of
    finding information 26 always / 18 seldom
    satisfaction with ability to find information
    31 vsat / 19 dsat
  • March 2004 (TechNET Web visitor profiling) Found
    everything 46, Found something 31, Found
    nothing 25

7
Emerging Trends in Information Architecture
  • Mental Models
  • Page Paradigm
  • Information Scent
  • Transitional Volatility
  • Effective View Navigation
  • Captology

8
Mental Models
  • Made famous most recently by Don Norman
  • People form mental models of themselves how the
    world around them, and the things, in it work
  • Incomplete
  • Unstable
  • Without firm boundaries
  • Unscientific
  • Parsimonious
  • Our users bring their peculiar mental model of
    how our sites work with them when they visit

9
Page Paradigm
  • Every user comes to a Web site with a goal in
    mind
  • On any given Web page the user will
  • Click something that appears to take them closer
    to their goal
  • Click the BACK button

10
Information Scent
  • Remote indications of target content in the form
    of out-links throughout the information structure
  • Users forage for content on our sites
  • Use hyperlinks as proximal cues for distal
    content
  • Information Scent is a subjective assessment of
    the user
  • Users actions towards their goal is informed and
    influenced by information scent
  • How to Buy has a strong scent
  • SQL Servers inoperability with Windows Server
    2003 has a weak scent

11
Transitional Volatility
  • Occurs in any page to page transition
  • Users are looking for something on the site and
    are often unable to predict the most direct
    path to success
  • Navigational competition (left navigation, right
    navigation, embedded links, stand alone links,
    etc.)
  • Navigational overload navigational mechanisms
    compete instead of coordinate with other
    mechanisms
  • Habituate --- Reorient --- Predict
  • Local view navigation provides the optimal user
    experience (showing only the present directory in
    detail)

12
Effective View Navigation
  • Navigational view is small and user short of time
  • Paths through navigation should be short
  • Where to go next is central to users concern
  • Navigability requires an interlocking Web of set
    representation
  • Conceptual perception so that the navigator can
    decode mirroring and form an actual perception of
    the information set
  • Similarity-based Navigation
  • Large-scale semantics dominate
  • More stress on granular labels

13
Effective View and Transitional Volatility in
Practice on Oracle
14
Captology
  • Study of the persuasive nature of technology
    http//captology.stanford.edu/
  • How can Web sites change what people believe and
    what they do
  • Types of Web site credibility
  • Presumed
  • Reputed
  • Surface
  • Earned

15
So, What Do We Know So Far?
  • Users come to us with a goal which is usually to
    get help bridging an information gap in their
    sensemaking model of the world
  • Along the way to collecting information to help
    them bridge this gap, they find other bits of
    information which may cause them to revise their
    original quest
  • Users come to our sites with a preconceived
    mental image of how the site is laid out and
    functions
  • Users tend to ignore all navigational aids to
    focus on the body content where they either find
    what they are looking for or a pointer or they
    hit the BACK button
  • Users follow a scent for the information that
    they desire
  • Users have a small frame (fisheye lens) through
    which they navigate and little time
  • Page to page transitions introduce transitional
    volatility which is not always bad local
    navigation views, working in collaboration with
    other navigational mechanism, provides the user
    with a sense of location (not lost-ness) and that
    the site has more content
  • Web sites have credibility which can be used to
    persuade the user to take certain action or
    change the users belief about something

16
Search
  • Enterprise vs. Web Search
  • SharePoint Portal Server
  • Up the road a piece
  • Not GPS

17
Architecture or Information Architecture
  • The way Clients are looking to the future
    requires that we should study our clients
    situation more than we have ever done before. If
    we are to succeed, we must learn a great deal
    about how clients are organized and what
    strategies underlie their way of doing business
  • Lorraine Johnson
  • Swinburne University of Technology
  • School of Information Technology
  • Hawthorne, Australia

18
Where Are We Now
  • Customer Verbatim
  • Since the adoption of the Product Lifecycle
    navigation across the Product sites, weve
    segmented and developed personas for our audience
    do they map to each other?
  • What is the identity of the Product Sites?

19
What About Our Sites? SQL Server Product Site
Today
20
But Wait, Theres More
21
And Still More
22
Where We Could Be
  • Competitor Analysis
  • Oracle
  • IBM
  • A proposed IA for the Product sites utilizing
    concepts recently discussed

23
Persuasive Architecture in Practice
24
Persuasive Architecture in Practice
25
SQL Server Maybe Later?
26
(No Transcript)
27
Resources Used for This Presentation
  • ASIST Special Interest Group Information
    Architecture Mail Archives
  • Searching Versus Finding Why Systems Need
    Knowledge to Find What you really Want Woods,
    W.A. Sun Microsystems http//research.sun.com/sp
    otlight/2004-04-05.wwoods.html April 2004
  • Guiding Users with Persuasive Design Perfetti,
    Christine User Interface Engineering.com
    http//www.uie.com/articles/chak_interview/
    March 2003
  • Business Centered Design Olsen, Henrik
    Interaction Designers Coffee Break
    http//www.guuui.com/issues/01_03.php January
    2003
  • Seductive Design for Web sites Scanlon, Tara
    User Interface Engineering.com
    http//www.uie.com/articles/seductive_design/
    July 1999
  • Persuasive Navigation Lash, Jeff Digital Web
    Magazine http//www.digital-web.com/columns/iaany
    thinggoes/iaanythinggoes_2002-12.shtml December
    2002
  • Understanding the Seductive Experience
    Khaslavsky, Julie, Shedroff, Nathan
    Communications of the ACM May 1999
  • Transitional Volatility in Web Behavior
    Danielson, David http//www.stanford.edu/davidd/
    MastersThesis/ June 2002
  • Transitional Volatility in Web Behavior
    Danielson, David IT Society vol.1, issue 3,
    Winter 2003 http//www.ITandSocity.org
  • From the minds eye of the user The Sense-Making
    qualitative-quantitative methodology Dervin,
    Brenda
  • In J. D. Glazier R. R. Powell (Eds.),
    Qualitative research in information management
    (pp. 61-84). Englewood, CO Libraries
    Unlimited. Reprinted in B. Dervin L.
    Foreman-Wernet (with E. Lauterbach) (Eds.).
    (2003). Sense-Making Methodology reader Selected
    writings of Brenda Dervin (pp. 269-292).
    Cresskill, NJ Hampton Press. (1992)

28
Resources Used for the Presentation
  • The Design of Browsing and Berrypicking
    Techniques for the Online Search Interface
    Bates, Marcia http//www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/b
    ates/berrypicking.html 1989
  • Incorporating Navigation Research into a Design
    Method Lombardi, Victor ASIST IA Summit 2004
    http//www.iasummit.org/finalpapers/13/13_Handout_
    or__final__paper.ppt
  • Conceptual Links Trump Hyperlinks Patch,
    Kimberly TRN Magazine.com http//www.trnmag.com/
    Stories/2002/071002/Conceptual_links_trump_hyperli
    nks_071002.html July 2002
  • The Page Paradigm Hurst, Mark
    Goodexperience.com http//www.goodexperience.com/
    columns/04/0219.pp.html February 2004
  • Scent Trails Olston, Chris, Chi, Ed Carnegie
    Mellon Databases.com http//www.db.cs.cmu.edu/Pub
    s/Lib/tochi03scenttrails/scenttrails.pdf 2001
  • Effective View Navigation Furnas, George School
    of Information, University of Michigan
    http//www.google.com/url?saUstart5qhttp//ww
    w.si.umich.edu/furnas/Papers/CHI97-EVN.2.pdfe77
    64 March 1997
  • Navigation in Electronic Worlds Jul, Susanne,
    Furnas, George Navigation 1997 Workshop
    http//www.si.umich.edu/furnas/Papers/Nav97_Repor
    t.pdf
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com