Ligand-Receptor Interfaces: Engineering of Important Interactions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Ligand-Receptor Interfaces: Engineering of Important Interactions

Description:

Engineering Selectivity and Discrimination into Ligand-Receptor Interfaces. ... interactions altered to yield pairs with high potency and high selectivity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:79
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Stef248
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ligand-Receptor Interfaces: Engineering of Important Interactions


1
Ligand-Receptor InterfacesEngineering of
Important Interactions
  • Stefanie B. Bumpus
  • CHEM 590A
  • October 5, 2005

2
Small Molecule-Protein Interface Engineering
  • Goal
  • Alter enzyme substrate specificity
  • Generate new ligand-receptor pairs
  • Control of cellular processes
  • Transcription
  • Apoptosis
  • Signal Transduction
  • Many design strategies utilized
  • Koh, JT., Engineering Selectivity and
    Discrimination into Ligand-Receptor Interfaces.
    Chemistry Biology, 917-23, 2002.

3
Overview
  • Discussion of ligand-receptor interface
    engineering strategies
  • Specific example of engineering the estrogen
    receptor
  • Discussion Questions

4
Orthogonal Ligand-Receptor Pairs
  • Orthogonal Ligand ligand able to bind altered
    receptor but not natural receptor
  • Orthogonal Receptor receptor able to bind
    synthetic ligand but not natural ligand
  • Functionally orthogonal pairs sufficient
  • Receptor discrimination
  • Ligands receptor selectivity
  • Koh, JT., Engineering Selectivity and
    Discrimination into Ligand-Receptor Interfaces.
    Chemistry Biology, 917-23, 2002.

5
Defining Ligand-Receptor Interactions
  • Rarely achieve absolute orthogonal interactions
  • Important modified receptor be non-responsive to
    natural ligand at physiological concentrations
  • Selectivity of engineered pair
  • Ligands receptor selectivity (RS)
  • Activity of Modified Pair/ Activity of Modified
    Ligand w/ wtR
  • Receptor Discrimination Ability
  • RS for natural ligand
  • RS EC50 (ligand mutant)/ EC50 (ligand wtR)

Shi, Y Koh, JT. Functionally Orthogonal
Ligand-Receptor Pairs for the Selective
Regulation of Gene Expression Generated by
Manipulation of Charged Residues at the
Ligand-Receptor Interface of ERa and ERß.
Journal of the American Chemical Society,
1246921-6928, 2002.
6
Steric Complementation Bumps Holes
  • Bumps ligand shape modified to be too large to
    fit in binding site
  • Holes binding site modifications
  • Successful method for generation of selective
    ligands
  • Hole-modified receptor can retain affinity for
    natural ligand
  • Dual Bump-Hole/Hole-Bump Modifications
  • Complications reduction in catalytic affinity,
    maintenance of high affinity
  • Koh, JT., Engineering Selectivity and
    Discrimination into Ligand-Receptor Interfaces.
    Chemistry Biology, 917-23, 2002.

7
Alterations of Polar Interactions
  • Reversal of Hydrogen Bonding Patterns
  • Donor/Acceptor Exchange
  • Complications arise from residues involved in
    hydrogen bonding
  • Manipulation of Charged Interactions
  • Charged residues do not need direct interaction
    with ligand to have effect
  • Koh, JT., Engineering Selectivity and
    Discrimination into Ligand-Receptor Interfaces.
    Chemistry Biology, 917-23, 2002.

8
Alterations of Polar Interactions
  • Charge Reversal
  • Production of orthogonal pairs possible, but see
    reduction in affinity
  • Polar/Charged Group Exchange
  • Only minor modifications from wild-type
  • Introduction of New Ion Pairs
  • Used to change substrate specificity
  • Ion Pair Neutralization
  • Greatly reduce affinity for natural substrate

Koh, JT., Engineering Selectivity and
Discrimination into Ligand-Receptor Interfaces.
Chemistry Biology, 917-23, 2002.
9
New Strategies in Engineering
  • De Novo Binding Sites
  • Engineering not restricted to existing interfaces
  • Engineering Reactivity
  • Many diseases associated with receptor mutations
  • Design of mimics as custom pharmaceuticals

Koh, JT., Engineering Selectivity and
Discrimination into Ligand-Receptor Interfaces.
Chemistry Biology, 917-23, 2002.
10
Functionally Orthogonal PairsAn In-Depth Look
  • Few examples of functionally orthogonal pairs
    able to exist completely independently of
    endogenous system
  • Manipulation of Charged Residues of the estrogen
    receptor (ER)
  • Rearrangement of electrostatic pairs
  • Loss or gain of selectively associated with loss
    of charge
  • Pairs sufficient for transcriptional regulation

Shi, Y Koh, JT. Functionally Orthogonal
Ligand-Receptor Pairs for the Selective
Regulation of Gene Expression Generated by
Manipulation of Charged Residues at the
Ligand-Receptor Interface of ERa and ERß.
Journal of the American Chemical Society,
1246921-6928, 2002.
11
The Estrogen Receptor
  • Member of nuclear/steroid hormone receptor family
  • Controls variety of cellular activities in
    response to estradiol-17ß (E2) and other natural
    estrogens (e.g. estrone)
  • Two isoforms of receptor protein

A-Ring
Estradiol-17b
Brzozowski, A.M., et al. Nature 389753-758,
1997.
12
Basis for ER Engineering
  • Mutation of a specific charged residue
  • Glu353
  • Involved in hydrogen bonding to A-ring
  • Goal Reduced specificity for natural ligand
  • Two different strategies for ligand design
  • Neutral or Anionic E2 analogues

Shi, Y Koh, JT. Functionally Orthogonal
Ligand-Receptor Pairs for the Selective
Regulation of Gene Expression Generated by
Manipulation of Charged Residues at the
Ligand-Receptor Interface of ERa and ERß.
Journal of the American Chemical Society,
1246921-6928, 2002.
13
Carboxylate Funtionalized Ligands
  • ES8 ligand may have RS to act as orthogonal
    ligand to both ER subtypes

Shi, Y Koh, JT. Functionally Orthogonal
Ligand-Receptor Pairs for the Selective
Regulation of Gene Expression Generated by
Manipulation of Charged Residues at the
Ligand-Receptor Interface of ERa and ERß.
Journal of the American Chemical Society,
1246921-6928, 2002.
14
Carboxylate Funtionalized Ligands
  • Luciferase reporter gene assays
  • ES8
  • Large RS w/ ERa, agonist of ERß
  • Proof of ES8 as functionally orthogonal ligand

Shi, Y Koh, JT. Functionally Orthogonal
Ligand-Receptor Pairs for the Selective
Regulation of Gene Expression Generated by
Manipulation of Charged Residues at the
Ligand-Receptor Interface of ERa and ERß.
Journal of the American Chemical Society,
1246921-6928, 2002.
15
Comparison of Structures of hERa hERb
DNA Binding Dimerization
Ligand Binding Transactivation
Hinge
Transactivation
1
180
262
302
552
595 aa
DNA Binding Dimerization
A/B
C
D
E
F
ERa
Ligand Binding Transactivation
Hinge
Transactivation
96
30
53
30
A/B
C
D
E
F
ERb
1
149
214
248
530 aa
Taken from Ogawa et al., BBRC 243122-126,1998
16
Transcriptionally Active Ligand/Receptor Pair
  • Binding of LBDs of isoforms similar despite low
    homology
  • Interaction of a partial agonist, genistein, in
    ERß similar to interactions of E2 in ERa
  • Interactions of phenol rings with Glu and Arg in
    LBD
  • Mutant ERß receptor engineering to test binding
    of ES8

Shi, Y Koh, JT. Functionally Orthogonal
Ligand-Receptor Pairs for the Selective
Regulation of Gene Expression Generated by
Manipulation of Charged Residues at the
Ligand-Receptor Interface of ERa and ERß.
Journal of the American Chemical Society,
1246921-6928, 2002.
17
Transcriptionally Active Ligand/Receptor Pair
  • ERß mutant shows excellent discrimination against
    E2
  • ES8 potent mutant agonist and large RS for
    modified receptor
  • ES8 functionally orthogonal to both endogenous
    receptor subtypes

Shi, Y Koh, JT. Functionally Orthogonal
Ligand-Receptor Pairs for the Selective
Regulation of Gene Expression Generated by
Manipulation of Charged Residues at the
Ligand-Receptor Interface of ERa and ERß.
Journal of the American Chemical Society,
1246921-6928, 2002.
18
In vitro Ligand Binding Assays
  • Binding ability of 3 modified ligands measured by
    radio-ligand displacement assays
  • Differences from in vivo assays
  • Important to note comparison between different
    receptors
  • Association constants show only 9-fold preference
    of ERß mutant versus wt-ERa
  • Enhanced binding selectivity of ES8 for ERa

Shi, Y Koh, JT. Functionally Orthogonal
Ligand-Receptor Pairs for the Selective
Regulation of Gene Expression Generated by
Manipulation of Charged Residues at the
Ligand-Receptor Interface of ERa and ERß.
Journal of the American Chemical Society,
1246921-6928, 2002.
19
Conclusions
  • Need engineered pairs to have high potency and be
    orthogonal to endogenous ligand-receptor pairs
  • Polar/charged interactions altered to yield pairs
    with high potency and high selectivity
  • Future work in development of multiple strategies
    to complement receptor mutations

Koh, JT., Engineering Selectivity and
Discrimination into Ligand-Receptor Interfaces.
Chemistry Biology, 917-23, 2002.
Shi, Y Koh, JT. Functionally Orthogonal
Ligand-Receptor Pairs for the Selective
Regulation of Gene Expression Generated by
Manipulation of Charged Residues at the
Ligand-Receptor Interface of ERa and ERß.
Journal of the American Chemical Society,
1246921-6928, 2002.
20
References
  • Koh, JT., Engineering Selectivity and
    Discrimination into Ligand-Receptor Interfaces.
    Chemistry Biology, 917-23, 2002.
  • Shi, Y Koh, JT. Functionally Orthogonal
    Ligand-Receptor Pairs for the Selective
    Regulation of Gene Expression Generated by
    Manipulation of Charged Residues at the
    Ligand-Receptor Interface of ERa and ERß.
    Journal of the American Chemical Society,
    1246921-6928, 2002.
  • Shi, Y and Koh, JT. Selective regulation of
    gene expression by an orthogonal estrogen
    receptor-ligand pair created by polar-group
    exchange. Chemistry Biology, 8501-510, 2001.

21
Discussion Questions
  • Why is it important to examine the interactions
    of ligand-receptor by both in vitro in vivo
    assays, not in vitro binding assays alone?
  • Mentioned previously was the applicability of
    this procedure to enzyme-substrate pairs. What
    would be the advantage engineering such systems?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com