A QoS Case Study: Packet Marking - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

A QoS Case Study: Packet Marking

Description:

COS Refers to three bits in the 802.1Q header that are ... Test Setup. Two Laptops. with Microsoft NetMeeting. USB Cameras. QoS Drivers ... NetMeeting Setup ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: JEv74
Category:
Tags: qos | case | marking | packet | setup | study

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A QoS Case Study: Packet Marking


1
A QoS Case StudyPacket Marking
  • Chris Hose chose_at_stevens-tech.edu
  • Alban Dani adani_at_stevens-tech.edu
  • Jason Evans jevans_at_stevens-tech.edu

2
COS (Ethernet Frame)
  • COS Refers to three bits in the 802.1Q header
    that are used to indicate the priority of the
    Ethernet frame as it passes through a switched
    network.

3
ToS (IP Packet)
  • ToS is a one-byte field that exists in an IPV4
    header. The ToS field consists of eight bits, of
    which the first three bits are used to indicate
    the priority of the IP packet. These first three
    bits are referred to as the IP precedence bits.

4
Topics
  • Setting the checking QoS values in the campus
    network.
  • Confirm endpoint is receiving QoS

Sending a receiving marked packets is only half
the story. Each switch and router that a
marked packet traverses must have multiple queues
to actually give priority to the packet.
5
(No Transcript)
6
Campus Network To NJEdge Extranet
7
Test Setup
  • Two Laptops
  • with Microsoft NetMeeting
  • USB Cameras
  • QoS Drivers
  • Ethereal Packet capture utility
  • PolyCom units

8
Add Driver to tag packets
  • NetMeeting will automatically assign Class
    Selector values of 3 and 5 to video and voice
    respectively once the QoS Packet Scheduler
    Service is installed
  • We will set the workgroup switch port to mark the
    packet with the proper value of 4

9
NetMeeting Setup
  • NetMeeting must be set at Cable, xDSL or ISDN
    or Local Area Network for the Polycom to answer
    the call.
  • Campus Gatekeeper configuration

10
CATA1 (2950-48)
  • class-map match-all videoclass
  • match access-group name VideoSrc
  • policy-map videopolicy
  • class videoclass
  • police 5000000 8192 exceed-action drop
  • set ip dscp 32
  • interface FastEthernet0/40
  • service-policy input videopolicy

11
35xxXL
  • For NetMeeting set all packets from port to CoS 4
  • interface FastEthernet0/14
  • switchport priority default 4
  • For PolyCom the switch can trust the CoS value
  • 35xx switches will trust CoS values by default,
    non video device ports should be set not to trust
    this marking.

12
CatCore (6509 native IOS)
  • mls qos
  • interface GigabitEthernet7/7
  • description All video device ports
  • mls qos trust cos
  • interface GigabitEthernet7/5
  • description Connection to Pix (Vlan 7)
  • mls qos trust dscp

13
PIX
  • See Frank Aversas presentation
  • Stevens does not use NAT
  • Configured the firewall to pass all packets to
    the endpoint without a problem

14
Gatekeeper Endpoint Registration
stevensgk.ccsh gatekeeper endpoints
GATEKEEPER ENDPOINT REGISTRATION
CallSig
nalAddr Port RASSignalAddr Port Zone Name
Type Flags --------------- ----- ---------------
----- --------- ---- ----- 155.246.18.8 1720
155.246.18.8 1719 stevensgk TERM
H323-ID Stevens E164-ID 0012012165001 155.24
6.154.237 1720 155.246.154.237 1620 stevensgk
TERM H323-ID adani E164-ID
0012012168238 Total number of active
registrations 2
15
Gatekeeper Call Status
stevensgk.ccsh gatekeeper calls Total number of
active calls 1.
GATEKEEPER CALL INFO
LocalCallID
Age(secs) BW 112-11283
52 256(Kbps) Endpt(s) Alias
E.164Addr src EP adani
0012012168238 CallSignalAddr Port
RASSignalAddr Port 155.246.154.237
1720 155.246.154.237 1632 Endpt(s) Alias
E.164Addr dst EP adani
0012012165001 CallSignalAddr Port
RASSignalAddr Port 155.246.154.237
1720 155.246.154.237 1632
16
Test Point 3A
Test Point 1
to
  • Select a packet from the far end endpoint under
    test
  • Confirm the packet is marked

17
Test Point 5
Test Point 1
to
  • Select a packet from the far end endpoint under
    test
  • Confirm the packet is marked

18
Summary
  • Mark packets as close to user as possible
  • Trust CoS as opposed to DSCP when using 3500XL or
    2900XL
  • Deploy 2950/3550 switches in areas which need QoS
    if possible
  • We are trusting that only the proper traffic from
    other NJEdge institutions have QoS marked
  • IOS version, IOS version, IOS version
  • Marking Packets is only half the story, queuing
    is the other half
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com