Title: alPHa
1Building for HealthFrom Vision to reality
Developing Tools to Evaluate the Health Impacts
of Land Use and Transportation
Dr. Lawrence Frank, President, LFC, Inc. and
Bombardier Chair Sustainable Transportation
University of British Columbia
www.act-trans.ubc.ca
2The built environment affects our health
3Transportation , travel choices and outcomes
4WorkingAcross Sectors
Dr. Lawrence Frank
5The Energy Balance Equation
Energy In
Energy Out
Body Weight
6Obesity Trends Among Canadian AdultsHPS, 1985
(BMI ? 30, or 30 lbs overweight for 54 woman)
Source Katzmarzyk PT. Can Med Assoc J
20021661039-1040.
7Obesity Trends Among Canadian AdultsNPHS, 1994
(BMI ? 30, or 30 lbs overweight for 54 woman)
Source Katzmarzyk PT. Can Med Assoc J
20021661039-1040.
8Obesity Trends Among Canadian AdultsCCHS, 2000
(BMI ? 30, or 30 lbs overweight for 54 woman)
Source P.T. Katzmarzyk, Unpublished Results.
Data from Statistics Canada. Health Indicators,
May, 2002.
9Obesity Trends Among Canadian Adults Provinces
(measured) CCHS, 2004 Territories (self-report)
CCHS, 2002
Data from Statistics Canada.
10Change is Inevitable. In a progressive Country
change is constant.Benjamin Disraeli, 1867
11Position Statement on Urban Planning Public
Health
- Peel Health will provide leadership community
support to ensure that public health
considerations are integrated into the future
urban growth development of the Region so that
vibrant safe communities are created that
protect enhance the health of all members of
the community while increasing their quality of
life. - Seattle / King County - Developing an evidence
based tool to guide local decision making on land
use and transportation Investment based on the
health and climate change impacts
12Purpose
- Purpose of this project Develop an
evidence-based, prototype health assessment tool
using local data - Goal provide greater opportunities for active
living in the Peel Region. - Priorities can be used at the secondary and
block plan level (development review) or to
evaluate broader scale planning / development
alternatives
13.
Proximity
2 KM
1 KM
Connect- ivity
14Blair, et al, 1996 Surgeon Generals Report 10
years ago
15The Current Evidence
- An association exists between community design
and health, environmental, and energy indicators - As walkability increases (compact, mixed use,
connected streets) so does walking, overall
physical activity, and transit use - As walkability increases obesity decreases and so
does per capita vehicle use and associated air
pollution, greenhouse gas, and energy consumption
16Measuring Urban Form
Proximity Density and Land Use Mix
Directness Street Network Connectivity
17(No Transcript)
18Low Walkability Postal Code Buffers with High
Proportions of the Elderly
Josh Van Loon and Larry Frank
19Land Use, Transportation, Air Quality Health
Study
- King Countys
- HealthScape
- Study
20Walkability
- Mixed Use
- Density
- Street Connectivity
- Amount of Retail
Census Block Groups
21(No Transcript)
22Residential Buffer
23OZONE - AIR POLLUTION
LIVE
WORK
Volatile Organic Compounds Intersection
Density Where People Live (n2467)
Volatile Organic Compounds and Retail Use Where
People Work (n2467)
Controlled for gender, income, age, total
number of vehicles in the house VOC differences
across quartiles significant (plt0.001
24The Choice to Walk Larger Numbers Stronger
Relationship
Assessed at Place of Residence
25A 5 Increase in Walkability is associated with
a
- 32 increase in minutes of walking and biking
- A ¼ pt reduction in BMI
- About ½ kilogram
- A 6.5 reduction in per capita vehicle miles
traveled - A 5.5 percent reduction in ozone precursors
- Oxides of Nitrogen and Volatile Organic Compounds
Frank et al 2006. Many Pathways from Land Use to
Health. Journal of the American Planning
Association.
26Walking for Non-Work Purposes
- Over a two-day period the odds of someone
reporting a walk trip increased by - 20 percent for each additional park in their 1
kilometer network buffer - 21 percent for each additional educational
facility within their 1 kilometer network buffer
27Transit for Work Purposes
- Over a two-day period the odds of someone
reporting a transit trip decreased by - 16 percent with each ¼ mile increase in the
distance to transit from the place of residence - 32 percent with each ¼ mile increase in the
distance to transit from the place of employment - 45 percent with each additional household vehicle
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30Access to jobs
31Predictors of Obesity
Coefficient
t
-
Ratio
P
-
Value
Age
0.012
0.000
6.00
-
4
.71
0.000
Education
-
0.080
-
4.75
0.000
-
0.057
Income
-
2.04
0.034
Walk Distance
-
0.049
2.875
0.003
Car Time
0.001
-
5.65
0.000
Land Use Mix
-
2.035
3.930
0.000
0.311
Black Male
5.09
0.000
Black Female
0.372
-
11.3
0.000
White Female
-
0.871
-
2.22
0.026
Constant
-
0.497
Frank, L., Andresen, M., and Schmid, T., Obesity
Relationships With Community Design, Physical
Activity, and Time Spent in Cars. American
Journal of Preventive Medicine. June 2004.
32Obesity Results Driving and Walking
- Every additional 30 minutes spent driving per day
translates into a 3 percent increase in the
likelihood of obesity - Time spent driving increases as walkability
decreases - Every additional Kilometer (.6 miles) walked
translates into 4.8 percent reduction in the
likelihood of being obese - Distances walked increases with walkability
Frank, L., Andresen, M., and Schmid, T., Obesity
Relationships With Community Design, Physical
Activity, and Time Spent in Cars. American
Journal of Preventive Medicine. June 2004.
33Obesity Results Mixed Use
- A white male 5 10 on average weighs 190 lbs in
the least mixed use and 180 lbs in the most mixed
use environments of Atlanta - A 10 pound difference
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36Physical Activity Findings
- Deployed activity monitors on 523 participants
- People in the most walkable areas of Atlanta are
2.4 times more likely to meet the 30 minutes per
day of moderate activity recommended by the U.S.
Surgeon General - 37 in the most and 18 in the least walkable
areas of the region met this basic requirement
Frank, Lawrence, D., Schmid, Tom, Sallis, James
E., Chapman, James, Saelens, Brian. (2005).
Linking Objectively Measured Activity with
Measured Urban Form. American Journal of
Preventive Medicine. Volume 28, No. 2S.
(see www.act-trans.ubc.ca)
37LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSES PREDICTING THE ODDS
OF WALKING AT LEAST ONCE OVER 2-DAYS
NS not significant, plt.05 (95), plt.01
(99), plt.001 (99.9)
controlling for socio-demographics and stratified
by age group (Averaged over 2 day period)
Urban Form Relationships with Walk Trip
Frequency and Distance among Youth Lawrence
Frank, PhD, Jacqueline Kerr, PhD, Jim Chapman,
James Sallis, PhD, American Journal of Health
Promotion
plt.05, plt.01, plt.001
38 Nutrition and Transportation Study (NEAT)
- Energy Balance equation Calories in Vs Out
- Evaluating Relative effects of physical activity
and where people go for food on Body Weight - Nutrition and Transportation Study (NEAT)
- Funded by Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (April
2006-07) - Results from the SMARTRAQ Atlanta Study
- Shows different relationships between physical
activity and food outlet visitation on Body Mass
Index
39Differences Across Gender Ethnicity Reported In
2004
40WHAT ABOUT WHERE PEOPLE GO FOR FOOD?
- Using Travel Survey and Physical Activity Data
- Walkability
- Physical Activity
- Food Outlet Visitation
- OUTCOME BMI
41(No Transcript)
42BMI MODELS ACROSS GENDER
43BMI MODELS ACROSS RACE
44Causation?Controlling for Neighborhood
Preference
45Neighborhood Preferences and Trade-Offs
46Lot Size and Drive Time
Stated Preference (Q3a, Q3b, Q3c)
47Latent Demand Lot Size and Drive Time
- 33 of the people who live in neighborhoods that
are far away (15-18 miles) from work, school, and
other important destinations would rather live on
smaller lots and be closer to these destinations.
48Street Design and Travel Options
Stated Preference (Q8a, Q8b, Q8c)
49Latent Demand Street Design and Travel Options
- 34 of the people who live in neighborhoods with
cul-de-sacs would prefer the increased travel
options of a connected grid, even if it means
there are more people from other neighborhoods
walking and driving on their street.
50Prefers a Walkable Community Design
Maximum
2
1
Built Environment
High Walkability
Low Walkability
Neighborhood Preferences
3
4
Minimum
Prefers Auto - Based Community Design
51(No Transcript)
52PREFERENCE VS NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN
53Lawrence Frank and Co., Inc.
54Next Steps
- Applying the research
- To land development decisions
- To transportation investment decisions
- Development of an evidence based cost / benefit
model - Creating a Health Impact Assessment Tool
- Across multiple outcomes
- Physical activity and obesity links with disease
onset - Vehicle emissions and air quality links with
respiratory based ailments - Bottom line
- Increases in health care and environmental costs
warrant careful investigation into ways to
proactively reduce adverse health impacts of land
development and transportation investment actions
55Application of Research Resultsto a Tool for
the Region of Peel
56Next Steps for Peel
Evidence / Best Practices Review (Nov 2007
April 2008)
Stakeholder Meetings / Forums (November 2007
May 2008)
- Develop methodological framework (Spring 2008)
- Database development (Spring Summer 2008)
- Descriptive Analysis (Fall 2008)
- Development of prototype model (Fall 2008)
57Springbrook Community Subarea 2 Block Plan
58Local Health Outcome Data
- Primary Data Source Canadian Community Health
Survey (CCHS) - Sampled over 2,000 Peel Region residents
- Relevant topics/questions include
- Height / weight / BMI / obese or overweight
status - Physical activity / walking and bicycling /
sedentary activities - Chronic conditions associated with obesity
diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease - Mental health
- Respiratory Illness
- Could use regional travel surveys as secondary
data source to estimate walk/bike/transit trips
and other transportation patterns
59Peel Region Transportation (2001)
Source Peel Data Centre http//www.region.peel.o
n.ca/planning/pdc/data/transportation/tomorrow/tri
ps-by-mode.htm
60Alternatives Analysis The Chino Pilot
- Applied results of our past research to
alternative development scenarios for 3
neighborhoods in Chino - Goal scale similar to Peel Region project
61Riverside Drive Alternative 1
62Riverside Drive Alternative 2
- Residential Emphasis Scenario
63Riverside Drive Alternative 3
64Riverside DriveResults
65Alternatives Analysis, part 2 King County, WA
HealthScape project and the PLACE3S model
- Goal
- Create a tool that can evaluate potential health
and climate change impacts of land development
actions - Comprehensive plans
- Changes in development regulations
- Changes in neighborhood plans
- Transit-Oriented Development
66Base The PLACE3S Model
- Developed by the Sacramento Area Council of
Governments (SACOG) / California Energy
Commission - Web-based application
- Parcel-based modeling structure
- Outputs can be fed back into regional travel
model - Works at a number of scales neighborhood level
to regional - Already measures impacts on a variety of
indicators energy, transportation,
jobs/economic development
67PLACE3S Model Development Process
- Build statistical models that express the
relationship between urban form measures and the
outcomes (CO2 from transport, physical activity,
BMI) - PLACE3S can calculate change in these urban form
measures for development alternatives - Outcomes will be added as PLACE3S indicators
68BOTH WHERE GROWTH GOES HOW IT IS DESGINED
MATTERS
69Zoning and Health
- Zoning was enabled by provinces and states for
local governments to control land use to promote
the health, safety and welfare of the public
(1926). - Euclidean zoning was conceived as a way to
ensure the separation of noxious unhealthy uses
from where people lived. - Over three quarters of a century later, the
separation of residential, retail, commercial,
and industrial uses is a standard zoning
practice.
70Impact Fees / Permitting Indirect Source Rule
San Joaquin Air Pollution Control District, CA
- Evaluates project level emissions from
development - Proposed developments must mitigate impacts of
emissions over threshold or pay impact fees - URBEMIS model used to predict emissions /
estimate impacts of mitigation strategies - Mitigation strategies include compact
development, mixed land uses, interconnected
street networks, sidewalks bike paths,
transit-oriented project design/location.
71Nothing Great Was Ever Achieved Without
Enthusiasm Ralph Waldo Emerson