Neurobiological Substrates of Stimulant Action and Reward - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Neurobiological Substrates of Stimulant Action and Reward

Description:

Neurobiological Substrates of Stimulant Action and Reward – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: eas75
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Neurobiological Substrates of Stimulant Action and Reward


1
Neurobiological Substrates of Stimulant Action
and Reward
Elliot A. Stein, Ph.D. Neuroimaging Research
Branch NIDA-IRP
2
Outline
  • The problem of drug abuse
  • Acute CNS effects of nicotine
  • Behavioral and neuropharm-
  • acological actions of acute cocaine and
    methylphenidate
  • Inhibitory control mechanisms
  • Cocaine and IC

3
The Problem of Substance Abuse
  • Essence of addiction is the compulsive
    self-administration of drug. Multiple hypotheses,
    each with different degrees of emphasis on MCL DA
    system
  • drugs are positively reinforcing- they feel good
  • drugs fix a negative state, either pre-existing
    or due to withdrawal from use
  • drugs of abuse hijack normal reward circuits
  • drug-induced DA release leads to over-learning of
    reward/drug association
  • Key point drug abuse is a recurring, relapsing
    brain disease with underlying pharmacological and
    behavioral mechanisms

4
Transition
Mechanisms???
5
A cigarette is the perfect type of a perfect
pleasure. It is exquisite and leaves one
unsatisfied. What more could one
want Oscar Wilde
Nicotine is the drug in tobacco that causes
addiction. The pharmacological and behavioral
processes that determine tobacco addiction are
similar to those that determine addiction to
drugs such as heroin and cocaine. Surgeon
General, 1988
6
Nicotine as an Addictive Agent
  • Capable of producing tolerance, physical
    dependence and withdrawal symptoms (increased
    irritability, anxiety and depression) upon
    cessation of use
  • Animals and humans SA nicotine, which shares
    behavioral properties with other drugs of abuse,
    most notably the psychomotor stimulants
  • Humans report IV nicotine as pleasant, often
    preferring it to cigarettes
  • Human cocaine abusers identify IV nicotine as
    similar, and in many cases, identical to IV
    cocaine

7
Objectives
  • To determine the CNS sites and mechanisms of
    action of acute nicotine in human cigarette
    smokers using functional magnetic resonance
    imaging (fMRI)

8
Nicotine (1.5 mg)
Stein, E.A. et al Am. J. Psych, 1998
9
fMRI Analysis-binary decision model
Parameters defined from known pharmacokinetics
and empirically via visual inspection Bloom et
al. Human Brain Map 8 235-244, 1999
10
OFG

insula
cing
Lat orb gyr
IFG
Stein, E.A. et al. Am. J. Psych 155 1009-1015,
1998
11
Nicotine regional activation
  • CORTEX
  • Orbital (posterior, lateral)
  • Cingulate
  • Frontal (inferior, medial, superior)
  • Temporal (inferior, medial, superior)
  • Insula
  • Visual (medial, inferior, lateral occipital
    cuneus, precuneus, lingual)
  • SUBCORTICAL
  • Thalamus VA, MD, LD, PL, VL, anterior n.
  • Basal Ganglia putamen, caudate, NAcc, globus
    pallidus
  • Limbic amygdala, hypothalamus
  • Colliculus superior, inferior

12
(No Transcript)
13
Cocaine
  • More reinforcing than amphetamines or
    opiates-monkeys SA cocainegt8000x/single injection
  • Given choice-prefer cocaine to food, water or
    sexual contact
  • Prefer cocaineshock to low (or no) cocaine
    without shock
  • Given unlimited access-monkeys and rats SA to
    death

14
Cocaine CNS effects
Breiter HC et al, Neuron, 19591-611 (1997)
15
Experimental Procedure
  • Day 1 (GCRC) each subject received IV cocaine
    (40mg/70kg) for safety toleration. Subjects were
    also trained on VAS behavioral assessment scales
    for HIGH, Pleasant, Nervous, CRAVING and Sour
    (1/min).
  • Day 2, 3, and 4 subjects underwent 4 consecutive
    fMRI scans each day (GE-EPI, TR6s, TE40ms, 1.5T
    GE Signa) and were injected with saline and one
    of the 3 doses cocaine (10, 20, 40 mg/70 kg the
    order dose of injections were blind to the
    subjects)

16
Finger-tapping
Before Cocaine

0
10
20
40
After Cocaine
Stein et al Unpublished data
17
Methylphenidate
  • Volkow et al PET (1994-present)
  • IV cocaine - baboons and cocaine users
  • IV MP healthy volunteers and cocaine users
  • Pharmacokinetics, Cardiovascular, Behavior,
    Distribution
  • Other neuroimaging - IV cocaine in humans
  • PET London et al (1990)- global CMRglu decreases
  • fMRI Breiter et al (1997)- mostly MCL regional
    activation

11C-Cocaine
11C-MP
Time (mins)
Time (mins)
18
Experimental Design
  • Experienced cocaine users
  • IV drug injections in 3 scanning sessions on
    separate days
  • 20mg/70kg cocaine (n13) 10 mg MP (n11) 20mg
    MP (n13)
  • 2 x 38 min runs per scan 1 saline 1 drug
  • Dose and drug/saline order single blinded

19
BOLD Time Series
Time (min)
Dirckx,et al 2004
20
Summary
  • 20mg cocaine, 20mg MP and 10mg MP
  • Signal Increases in LEFT
  • ventromedial orbitofrontal cortex
  • prefrontal cortex
  • anterior cingulate
  • caudate head/body
  • dorsomedial thalamus
  • Insula
  • Signal Decreases in LEFT
  • nucleus accumbens
  • subcallosal gyrus
  • Saline
  • No significant changes (small LEFT NAc increase
    in 20MP saline condition)

21
Dirckx,et al 2004
22
Conclusions
  • BOLD can used to follow time-and dose-dependent
    regional alterations in neuronal activity
    following acute drug administration
  • Abused drugs appear to exert similar activation/
    deactivation effects (e.g. negative in NAcc and
    positive in ACC) on similar groups of structures
    (e.g. MCL regions)
  • fMRI can be applied to follow real-time CNS
    pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of
    drug actions
  • Given similar sites (so far), the different abuse
    liabilities of cocaine and MPh may be rooted in
    their differing pharmacokinetics (Volkow et al)

23
Right Hemisphere Dominance of Inhibitory Control
an Event Related functional MRI Study Garavan,
Ross and Stein PNAS (USA) 96 8301-8306, 1999
24
Significance of Inhibitory Control
  • Suppression of irrelevant/interfering stimuli or
    impulses fundamental executive function
    essential for normal thinking
  • IC deficits implicated in ADHD, Tourettes, OCD,
    other disinhibition syndromes-including drug
    abuse
  • Characteristic of frontal lobe development

25
Inhibitory Control Task
500 msec
L
Y
A
Y
M
T
A
X
P
G
Respond (Target 1)
Respond (Target 2)
1000 Letters (150 Targets - 25 Lures)
26
Frontal-Parietal co-Activation
L R
IFG/OFG
Med Fr Cx
Post parietal
Garavan et al PNAS (USA) 96 8301-6, 1999
27
Inhibitory Control
4
2
3
Mean AUC
1
Inf. Parietal Lob
  • IFG-OFC
  • MGF-dlpfc
  • Insula
  • Post Parietal lobe

r-0.67
Target RT
Garavan, Ross and Stein PNAS (USA) 96 8301-8306,
1999
28
Inhibitory Control Conclusions
  • Confirms a role for orbital frontal, parietal,
    and cerebellar regions in inhibitory control
  • Implicates a preferential role for right
    hemisphere in response inhibition
  • Baseline to compare with drug abuse Ss (on and
    off drug)

29
IC and Cocaine Abuse
  • Pharmacological effects of cocaine on MCL DA
    system insufficient to explain cognitive deficits
    often seen in chronic drug abusers (e.g. impaired
    attention, memory and IC reported)
  • Failure to develop and/or loss of IC can
    profoundly impact ability to gate pre-potent, yet
    inappropriate and dangerous behaviors, e.g.
    cocaine use
  • Cocaine users show decreased frontal, cingulate,
    insula and superior temporal gray matter
  • Cocaine users show decreases in cingulate and OFC
    metabolism
  • Functional consequences not well understood

30
Inhibitory Control Task
Kaufman et al J Neurosci 23 2003
1180 Go and 80 NoGO stimuli over 4 runs, enabling
the study of both response inhibition and
error-related processes. Task difficulty varied
to equate behavioral performance
31
Inhibitory Control
Users (n13)
Controls (n14)
Successful Inhibitions
Failed Inhibitions
Stops UltC ACC, Rt. insula
Errors UltC R. MFG/preSMA, ACC, L. insula, L.
IFG
Kaufman et al J Neurosci 23 2003
32
Inhibitory Control
Users (n13)
Controls (n14)
Successful Inhibitions
Failed Inhibitions
Stops UltC ACC, Rt. insula
Errors UltC R. MFG/preSMA, ACC, L. insula, L.
IFG
Kaufman et al J Neurosci 23 2003
33
Cocaine and Response Inhibition
  • ACC, area critical for cognitive control esp. in
    urgent inhibitions, and activated by all abused
    drugs tested, less responsive in cocaine USERS
    for STOPS and ERRORS
  • STOP related hypoactivity in R insula and rostral
    ACC, emotional processing areas, not in other IC
    areas, suggests hypoactivity not ubiquitous but
    specific
  • ACC also hypoactive in Scz and hyperactive in
    OCD-consistent with problems in error monitoring
    system (failure to monitor and integrate in Scz
    overactive monitoring in OCD)

34
1H-MRS in Cocaine Abuse
Basal ganglia
No change NAA/Cr
Thalamus
Basal ganglia
NAA/Cr
  • Dec or viability of neurons
  • Dec synaptic density
  • Neuronal dysregulation/
  • dysfunction
  • Monoamine depletion

Thalamus
Cocaine (n21)
Control (n13)
Li et al Biol Psych 1999
35
Clinical Implications
  • Hypoactivity in USERS reduced IC, diminished
    action monitoring, reduced responsivity to self
    errors-may, at minimum, serve to prolong drug
    abuse
  • Suggests USERS may be compromised in endogenous
    and volitional control of behavior thus behavior
    disproportionately determined by environmental
    contingencies, cues (drug craving cues) and
    automatized or habitual behaviors leading to
    reduced capacity to inhibit external influences
  • May inform optimal therapeutic interventions and
    help identify casual users most at risk for
    becoming dependent

36
The folks in the lab who REALLY did the work
Tom Ross Hugh Garavan BettyJo Salmeron Rob
Risinger John Pankiewicz Natalia Lawrence Alan
Bloom Stacy Engelbart Jackie Kaufman Veronica
Dixon Qiwen Mu Sharon Dirckx Shi-Jiang Li
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com