Quantum computING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Quantum computING

Description:

... fundementally unique properties. ... Sounds familiar? Shor's Algoritm (cont'd) Pick a random ... it possesses unique properties and therefore challanges some ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Xasf
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quantum computING


1
Quantum computING CRYPTOLOGY
  • S. Aras Kubilay
  • CS 532 Network Security

2
Roadmap
  • Introduction
  • Quantum Computers
  • Quantum Computers Cryptology
  • Closing Comments

3
Introduction
  • What is quantum computing?
  • Collective name for storing, representing and
    manipulating data in a quantum computer..
  • .. which is essentially still a hypothetical
    device on par with teleportation and laser beam
    weapons.

4
Introduction
  • With one crucial difference
  • Various scientific, governmental and military
    institutions worldwide are actually funding
    billions of dollars for making quantum computers
    a reality.
  • But why?

5
Quantum Computers
  • Research suggests that quantum computers are
    likely to be much faster than any other
    computational model put forth so far.
  • That includes, besides traditional
    transistor-based Von Neumann architecture,
    experimental designs such as optical and
    biological computers.
  • Exponentially faster in some cases.

6
Quantum Computers
  • Quantum computers work on an atomic level
  • That is roughly 200 times smaller than Intels
    brand new 45nm architecture.
  • Furthermore, quantum computers are based on
    quantum binary digits (qubits) just as
    traditional computers are based on bits.
  • Qubits have some fundementally unique properties.

7
Quantum Computers
  • A qubit is essentially an atom showing
    quantum-mechanical behaviour.
  • Just as a regular bit, qubits are also used to
    represent 1 / 0 values, usually denominated by
    the up-spin or down-spin of the atom.
  • Spin An integral quality of all elemental
    particles and related to orbital angular
    momentum.
  • Lets suffice to say that it exists and is either
    up or down )

8
Quantum Computers
  • However unlike bits, qubits benefit from quantum
    superposition.
  • A bit in classical mechanics has some exact
    probability (usually 0.5) to have either 0 or 1
    value.
  • A qubit in quantum mechanics has a probability
    distribution function of having any of those
    values at any given time.
  • Thus a pair of qubits can have 4 superpositional
    states while three qubits can have 8 states and
    so on.

9
Quantum Computers
  • The fundamental difference about all this is
  • At any given time
  • n bits can be in one of the 2n states.
  • n qubits can be in up to 2n states
    simultaneously.
  • Suggests an incredible potential in parallel
    computing power.

10
Quantum Computers
  • As if all that werent enough, there is yet
    another advantage of qubits over bits.
  • Some qubit pairs may be in quantum entanglement,
    which is a phenomenon that links the quantum
    states of two spatially seperated particles.
  • Which is to say that we can modify or read two
    qubits in a single action without ever touching
    the second one.

11
Quantum Computers
  • So in the end we have computers that are smaller,
    inherently parallel and distributed.
  • Due to size of atoms, quantum superpositional
    states and quantum entanglement, respectively.
  • However there are still limits to the
    capabilities of quantum computers, thankfully for
    us computer security people )
  • Lets see them.

12
Quantum Computers Cryptology
  • One famous idea about quantum computers
    cryptology
  • If realized, a quantum computer can simply try
    all possible key combinations in parallel and
    crack any key of infinite size in one single
    stroke through brute-force.
  • True or false?

13
Quantum Computers Cryptology
  • Lets see what quantum computers can do.
  • Shors Algorithm
  • While the exact specifications are way out of
    scope, we will see a simplified overview.
  • Problem definition For a non-prime positive
    integer N, find an integer p that divides N and 1
    lt p lt N.
  • Sounds familiar?

14
Quantum Computers Cryptology
  • Shors Algoritm (contd)
  • Pick a random number i lt N.
  • Compute gcd(i, N) through traditional methods.
  • Euclidean Algorithm etc.
  • If gcd(i, N) 1 stop, otherwise
  • Use quantum computing to find period r such that
  • f(x) ax mod N, and f(x r) f(x)
  • Quantum superposition for efficient calculation.
  • gcd(i(r/2) /- 1, N) is a factor of N.
  • If r is odd or i(r/2) -1 (mod N), restart with
    different i.

15
Quantum Computers Cryptology
  • Shors Algorithm, although still mostly
    academical, was later improved by other
    researchers.
  • Up to 8 times faster (David M., Queensland)
  • The profound meaning of this algorithm is that
    quantum computers are exponentially better at the
    factorization problem, rendering brute-force
    solutions feasible.
  • O((log N)3) vs classical O(2((log N)1/3)).
  • So what if factorization can be done in
    polynomial time?

16
Quantum Computers Cryptology
  • The security of public-key cryptograhpy methods
    (most notably RSA) depend on the infeasibilty of
    the factorization problem.
  • In RSA, it is impractically difficult to try and
    find the prime factors p and q for N.
  • However, a powerful enough quantum computer can
    factorize and thereby crack any RSA
    implementation.
  • Would increasing key size solve this problem?

17
Quantum Computers Cryptology
  • What about good old symmetric key cryptography?
  • We have established that quantum computers cannot
    instantly try infinite key possibilities, but can
    they exhaust practical key-size spaces in a
    reasonable time?
  • A classical brute-force attack against a
    symmetric crypto key is O(2N) for N-bit keys.
  • So a 256-bit key is reasonable secure while
    1024-bit is pretty solid.

18
Quantum Computers Cryptology
  • However, if quantum computers can somehow do it
    in polynomial time, it again becomes a futile
    race of key size vs. computer power like in PKC.
  • This was a major concern for the industry, so
    researchers from IBM and Microsoft together with
    Berkeley and Montreal Universities have conducted
    an in-depth research based on quantum Turing
    machines.
  • You may remember from some other courses that
    Turing machines are equivalents of any computer
    in terms of computational capabilities.

Bennett, Bernstein, Brassard, Vazirani.
Strength and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing.
(1996)
19
Quantum Computers Cryptology
  • This joint research revealed that..
  • .. a brute force quantum attack against symmetric
    cryptosystems is bound by O(2(N/2)).
  • Later work on Grovers search algorithm, which is
    proven to be optimal, has confirmed this finding,
    with some very specific cases showing quadratic
    performance gain.
  • Since there is no exponential gain, keys can be
    easily guarded against quantum brute-force
    attacks by simply doubling the key size.

20
Closing Comments
  • Quantum computing is not the panacea its
    sometimes made to look like.
  • However, it possesses unique properties and
    therefore challanges some of the established
    security measures, PKC chief among them.
  • Symmetric key systems are likely to hold their
    own agaisnt quantum cryptanalytic attacks.

21
Closing Comments
  • Although practicle quantum computers are probably
    decades away, especially short-term precautions
    must be taken while long-term methodologies
    develop.
  • Studies show promise with one-time algortihms
    with doubled key sizes.
  • Such as Lamport digital signatures.

22
Closing Comments
  • Any questions?
  • (No theoretical physics, please ) )
  • References
  • Bennett, Bernstein, Brassard, Vazirani. Strength
    and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing. (1996)
  • David McMahon. Quantum Computing Explained.
    (2007)
  • Nakahara, Ohmi. Quantum Computing From Linear
    Algebra to Physical Realizations. (2008)
  • And of course, Wikipedia.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com