Title: Fractals. Geostatistics. Time series analysis.
1Fractals. Geostatistics. Time series analysis.
- Edith Perrier, IRD France,
- Visiting scientist at UCT,
- Applied Maths Dept., room 417.1, Ext. 3205,
- E-mail edith_at_maths.uct.ac.za
- Web site where to download previous lectures
lect.ppt (or lect.zip if links included)
http//www.mth.uct.ac.za/Affiliations/BioMaths/Ind
ex.html
2Time series and functions f(t)
- A time series plot of a sequence of measures x0,
x1, x2, x3, ..consists of plotting the points - (0, x0), (1, x1), (2, x2), (3, x3), ...
- fIRgtIR
- t-gtf(t), graph
- often a function of time
3Fractal curves as functions differentiable only
on a set of points of measure 0
- Pathogical curves Weierstrass described a
function that was continuous but
nondifferentiable -- no tangent could be
described at any point. Cantor showed how a
simple, repeated procedure could turn a line into
a dust of scattered points, and Peano generated a
convoluted curve that eventually touches every
point on a plane. Whereas one can show that for
ordinary function f 0,1-gtIR with a continuous
derivation, the graph of f is a regular
1-dimendional set, the Cantor graph has a non
integer fractal dimension as well as the von
Koch, Peano (Hilbert) curves. - (http//plus.maths.org/) Hermite described these
new functions as a "dreadful plague" and Poincaré
wrote "Yesterday, if a new function was
invented it was to serve some practical end
today they are specially invented only to show up
the arguments of our fathers, and they will never
have any other use". - http//www.math.ethz.ch/finance/talksSS2002.html.
Talks in Financial and Insurance Mathematics,
Summer Term 2002
4Weierstrass function
Exercise try different values for s
s1.5
5Solution
Run Mathematica
Web Example
6Weierstrass graph fractal dimension
- Hints from Falconer (1990) p.148
- Recent paper from Hunt (1996)
- The Weierstrass nowhere differentiable function,
and functions constructed from similar infinite
series, have been studied often as examples of
functions whose graph is a fractal. Though there
is a simple formula for the Hausdorff dimension
of the graph which is widely accepted, it has not
been rigorously proved to hold. We prove that if
arbitrary phases are included in each term of the
summation for the Weierstrass function, the
Hausdorff dimension of the graph of the function
has the conjectured value for almost every
sequence of phases. The argument extends to a
much wider class of Weierstrass-like functions.
7Temporal auto-correlations
We might expect a fractal graph with
( Proof using Box Counting
dimensions)
It is reasonable to expect a signal with a power
spectrum ( Proof using
Fourier transforms)
Falconer, 1990, p.158)
8Geostatistics
- Geostatistics is a collection of statistical
methods which were traditionally used in
geo-sciences. These methods describe spatial
autocorrelation among sample data and use it in
various types of spatial models. Geostatistical
methods were recently adopted in ecology
(landscape ecology) and appeared to be very
useful in this new area. - Regionalized random function Z(X) with
assumptions of ergodicity (a single sample would
reflect the statistical character of the random
variable) thus stationarity (statistical
homogeneity where on smaller subparts, we have
the same RF with different realizations) - First moment mean m(x)EZ(X),
- Second order moments variance varZ(X)E(Z(X)-m(
x))2 and covariance C(x,xh)E(Z(X)-m(x))(Z(xh)
-m(xh)) - Spatial autocorrelation can be analyzed using
correlograms, covariance functions and variograms
(semivariograms).
9Spatial autocorrelations
- Correlogram is estimated using equation
-
- where indexes -h and h refer to sample points
located at the tail and head of vector h z-h and
zh are organism counts in samples separated by
lag vector h summation is performed over all
pairs of samples separated by vector h Nh is the
number of pairs of samples separated by vector h
M-h and Mh are mean values for samples located
at the tail and head of vector h s-h and sh are
standard deviations of samples located at the
tail and head of vector h. - Other measures of spatial dependence are
covariance function -
- and variogram (semivariogram)
-
- The correlogram, covariance function, and
variogram are all related. If the population mean
and variance are constant over the sampling area
(there is no trend) then -
- where C(0) is the covariance at zero lag
variance squared standard deviation. - Fromhttp//www.gypsymoth.ento.vt.edu/sharov/PopEc
ol/lec3/geostat.html Alexei A. Sharov, Department
of Entomology at Virginia Tech.
10Variograms
11Examples of one-dimensional spatial distributions
with different nugget effects and corresponding
variograms
http//www.gypsymoth.ento.vt.edu/sharov/PopEcol/l
ec3/geostat.html
12Geostatistics, estimations and kriging
- Geostatistics changes the entire methodology of
sampling. Traditional sampling methods don't work
with autocorrelated data and therefore, the main
purpose of sampling plans is to avoid spatial
correlations. In geostatistics there is no need
in avoiding autocorrelations and sampling becomes
less restrictive. Also, geostatistics changes the
emphasis from estimation of averages to mapping
of spatially-distributed populations. - The value z0 at unsampled location 0 is estimated
as a weighted average of sample values zi at
locations i around it Weights depend on the
degree of correlations among sample points and
estimated point.
13Variograms and fractals
- Search for theoretical links
- The Fractal/Facies Concept An Alternative to
Using Variograms for Generating Subsurface
Heterogeneity from Fred J. Molz, III,
Environmental Engineering Science, Clemson
University, fredi_at_clemson.edu, James W. Castle,
Geological Sciences, Clemson University, and
Silong Lu, Geotrans, Inc,. Past applications of
stochastic theory in geology have been based
mainly on treating heterogeneous property
distributions as stationary, correlated, random
processes, with short correlation lengths. A
convenient way to characterize such distributions
is through computation of a variogram, which
should reach a sill as one approaches a
measurement separation equal to the correlation
length. This approach has had limited success,
because often a sill is not reached or is poorly
defined. An explanation for such behavior is
given by modern fractal-based theories that
conceptualize natural heterogeneity as
non-stationary stochastic processes with
stationary increments, the mathematical basis for
stochastic fractals. - Multifractality and spatial statistics Cheng QM
COMPUTERS GEOSCIENCES 25 (9) 949-961 NOV 1999.
. In the present paper, a theoretical
investigation is developed to illustrate (1) the
characteristics of multifractality as measured by
the parameter tau "(q) (2) relationships between
multifractality and spatial statistics including
semivariogram and autocorrelation in
geostatistics, indexes used in lacunarity
analysis and correlation coefficients. It can be
shown that these statistics primarily are related
to multifractality as determined by tau "(1).
This is an important result because not only does
it provide the link between multifractals and
spatial statistics but it also shows that
statistics based on second-order moments are
restrictive in that they only characterize a
multifractal measure around the mean value. In
applications where extreme values need to be
taken into account, the entire multifractal
spectrum should be used rather than local
properties of the spectrum around the mean only
alternatively, statistics defined on the basis of
higher-order moments can be employed for analysis
of extreme values. - Even softwares
- Management
14Static patterns and dynamical processes?
15Lecture series
- Lecture 1. March. 3rd. Introduction to fractal
geometry . Measures and power laws. - Lecture 2. March 5th. Definitions of non-integer
dimensions and mathematical formalisms - Lecture 3. March 10th. Iteration of functions and
fractal patterns - Lecture 4. March 12th. Extensions Self-similar
and self-affine sets . Multifractals. - Lecture 5. March 17th. Fractals / Geostatistics
/ Time series analysis - Lecture 6. March 19th. Dynamical processes
Fractal and random walks - Lecture 7. March 24th. Dynamical processes
Fractal and Percolation - Lecture 8. March 26th. Dynamical processes
Fractal and Chaos