Arithmetic to Algebra Chris Linsell - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Arithmetic to Algebra Chris Linsell

Description:

fact must astonish us, or rather would astonish us if we were not ... Conventions of symbolisation. Patterns and relationships. 16. 16. Methodology. Qualitative ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:153
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: crl47
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Arithmetic to Algebra Chris Linsell


1
Arithmetic to Algebra Chris Linsell
  • Long-standing difficulties
  • School algebra
  • Conceptual difficulties
  • Results
  • Summary

2
Poincare 1908
  • One. ..fact must astonish us, or rather would
    astonish us if we were not too much accustomed to
    it. How does it happen that there are people who
    do not understand mathematics? If the science
    invokes only the rules of logic, those accepted
    by all well-formed minds. ..how does it happen
    that there are so many people who are entirely
    impervious to it?

3
Freudenthal 1973
  • With the utmost patience teachers tried to
    engrave in their pupils' minds that letters in
    algebra mean something, that no formula is
    meaningful unless the meaning of its components
    is told, and that algebra is not a meaningless
    game with 26 letters.
  • It was to no avail.

4
Major Reports
  • The Cockroft Report in the UK (DES, 1982)
    highlighted the fact that algebra is a source of
    considerable confusion and negative attitudes
    among pupils
  • School algebra Primarily manipulations of empty
    symbols on a piece of paper? (Brekke, 2001)

5
Hewitt 2001
  • A girl in the class was looking at the following
  • Example l x39 x6 Example 2 x710 x3
  • I asked her whether she understood what was
    written on the board and she replied I don't
    understand, I just copy it down.
  • I then asked What is the 'ex' on the board?
  • To which she replied What 'ex'? That's a times.

6
What is algebra?
  • recognising patterns and relationships in
    mathematics and the real world,
  • generalised arithmetic,
  • abstract thinking,
  • using symbols, notations and graphs,
  • unknowns,
  • variables,
  • a language to represent and communicate,
  • a calculus for solving certain classes of
    problems,
  • the activity of operating on expressions and
    equations,
  • generalisation,
  • proof and validation

7
Arithmetic and algebra
  • arithmetic reasoning may be used to solve
    problems when there is an easily established
    connection between the known quantities
  • algebraic reasoning is required when at the
    outset no connection can be established directly
    between the known quantities

8
A useful definition?
  • Algebra is much more than the manipulation of
    symbols and may be viewed as the symbolising of
    general numerical relationships and mathematical
    structures and operating on those structures
    (Kieran, 1992)

9
Process / object duality and procepts
  • Counting?natural?subtracting?negative?roots?imagin
    ary and complex
  • Adding?sums
  • Evaluating expressions?equations
  • Procepts, pivotal symbolism

10
Cognitive development in algebra
  • operational procepts of arithmetic
  • evaluation processes in generalized arithmetic
  • manipulation of procepts in manipulation algebra
  • defined concepts in axiomatic algebra

11
How could we introduce algebra to Year 9
students?
  • generalisation
  • problem solving
  • functions
  • modelling
  • algebra in schools is often reduced to rules for
    transforming and solving equations

12
The sign
  • 35
  • compute now
  • is equivalent to
  • Process/object again
  • 358210
  • lack of appreciation of the structure of
    mathematical statements
  • 3x154475 and 3x475154

13
Abstraction
  • mathematical constructs are totally inaccessible
    to our senses
  • a symbol is merely one representation of an
    abstract concept
  • it is a hallmark of mathematics that symbols are
    used as if they were the objects themselves
  • Pirie-Kieren model

14
Numeracy
  • x37 can be solved by advanced counters by guess
    and check, but can be solved much more easily by
    part/whole thinkers able to visualise 7 as 34
  • 2x311 requires an understanding of numbers
    beyond simple additive part/whole or
    multiplicative part/whole thinking
  • 2(x3)2x22 requires an understanding of the use
    of brackets, the hierarchy of operations, and an
    understanding of the commutative, associative
    and distributive laws

15
Other conceptual difficulties
  • Lack of closure
  • Binary / unary operations
  • Operating on unknowns
  • Unknown / generalised number / variable /
    parameter
  • Conventions of symbolisation
  • Patterns and relationships

16
Methodology
  • Qualitative
  • 4 Year 9 students studied for 27 lessons
  • Activity based approach
  • Data videotapes of lessons, SRIs, students
    work, field notes
  • Transcription and analysis

17
Unknowns and variables
  • Letter symbols used to represent unknowns,
    variables and generalised numbers
  • Students often did not write relationships
  • Sometimes students did not even use letter
    symbols
  • Learning generalised number 3/4
  • variable 1/4
  • unknown ?

18
Arithmetic and Algebraic Reasoning
  • Guess and check / formal solving
  • Difficulties with guess and check
  • Calculators for guess and check
  • Short-cutting guess and check
  • Algebraic structure clues from mistakes
  • Unknowns on both sides
  • Learning algebraic reasoning 2/4 perhaps

19
Process/object
  • Models of Dubinsky and Sfard
  • Action / interiorisation
  • Process / condensation
  • Object / reification
  • Learning action / interiorisation 3/4
  • process 2/4
  • object 0/4

20
Process and procedure
  • Superficial similarity
  • Analogy of two-digit subtraction
  • Getting the right answer
  • Clues from errors
  • Learning procedure 3/4
  • process 2/4

21
Notation and Convention
  • Algebraic notation
  • Division and fractions
  • Vertical arithmetic
  • Series of horizontal arithmetic steps
  • Appropriation of implied sign
  • Appropriation of x
  • Equations as formal conventions

22
Language
  • Solving
  • Equations

23
Prerequisite Numeracy
  • Numeracy as a predictor of learning
  • Arithmetic structure
  • Inverse operations
  • Operating on integers
  • Binary/ unary view

24
Strategic Thinking
  • Multiplicative part / whole
  • Expressions as objects
  • Value of guess and check
  • Constraints on choice of parts
  • Unknown parts
  • Algebraic part / whole thinking
  • Equations as objects
  • Time spent on stages

25
Summary of Literature
  • Algebra is much more than the manipulation of
    symbols and may be viewed as the symbolising of
    general numerical relationships and mathematical
    structures and operating on those structures
  • Letter symbols are used as specific unknowns,
    generalised numbers, parameters and variables and
    children need to recognise and understand these
    different uses.
  • Algebra is intimately connected to arithmetic and
    children need to have strong numeracy skills to
    develop algebraic thinking
  • The process-object model of Sfard seems
    particularly useful for describing the
    development of algebraic understanding. Many
    children do not move on from a procedural view of
    equations to a structural perspective.

26
Summary of Study 1
  • The level of numeracy displayed by each of the
    four students was a strong predictor of the
    amount of algebra they would learn during the
    topic. Only the students who displayed an
    understanding of arithmetic structure were able
    to carry out the process of unravelling
    expressions, rather than just following
    procedures. Lack of understanding of inverse
    operations was also an impediment to solving
    equations.

27
Summary of Study 2
  • When attempting to solve equations by formal
    methods, the students either followed procedures,
    or carried out processes, rather than treating
    equations as objects to act on. Conventional
    approaches to the teaching of solving equations
    focus on algebraic statements and their
    transformations, and are therefore based on an
    object view of equations. It is suggested that
    this stage is difficult to achieve.

28
Summary of Study 3
  • It was apparent that the part/whole thinking
    required for algebra posed conceptual
    difficulties beyond those inherent in arithmetic.
    Multiplicative part/whole thinking is argued to
    be a prerequisite for solving equations by formal
    methods if the student is to have an
    understanding of the process beyond merely
    following a procedure.

29
Summary of Study 4
  • If operating on unknowns is regarded as one of
    the defining features of algebraic thinking, then
    the students remained largely at the stage of
    arithmetic thinking throughout the topic.
  • Algebraic part/whole thinking is postulated as a
    strategy stage. This is seen as being more
    advanced than multiplicative part/whole thinking
    and a precursor to treating equations as objects.

30
Summary of Study 5
  • The progress of the students in learning to solve
    equations was very slow. If algebraic thinking
    is part of a continuum of strategic thinking that
    starts with early arithmetic, and if it requires
    the movement from a process to object view of
    equations, then one might expect the majority of
    students to remain at their starting strategy
    stage for a year or more.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com