Industries activities in collaboration with the Commission - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Industries activities in collaboration with the Commission

Description:

... Regulation and joined informally some AHWGs (textiles, shoes) ... Textiles. Tourist Accommodation. Overview of the results and possible improvements (I) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: uea8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Industries activities in collaboration with the Commission


1
Industries activities in collaboration with the
Commission
  • UNICE-UEAPME Eco-Label Information Day
  • Guido Lena
  • Responsible for Environmental Affairs at UEAPME

2
Why concentrate on Eco-Label?
  • Eco-Label is one of the very few voluntary
    instruments of the EU environmental policy
  • UEAPME thinks that voluntary instruments should
    be supported and increased. At the same time, the
    command and control approach should be reduced.

3
Eco-Label has potential for SMEs
  • The European Eco-Label guarantees that products
    and services respect and take care of our
    environment. This is, therefore, one of the best
    official tools for businesses who want to have a
    "green" image.
  • The European Eco-Label is a powerful market tool
    for SMEs operating in the Internal Market, since
    it can be used and recognised throughout the
    European Union and the European Economic Area.
  • It is also open to services.

4
Lets get in and make it better!(the story)
  • UEAPMEs First request to DG Environment August
    95 No!
  • UEAPMEs Second request to DG Environment March
    97 Yes!
  • UEAPME contributed towards the revision of the
    Eco-Label Regulation and joined informally some
    AHWGs (textiles, shoes)

5
Lets get in and make it better!(the results I.)
  • At the end of the Revision of the Eco-Label
    Regulation
  • UEAPME was given the task to represent SMEs and
    Craft as full member of the European Eco-Label
    scheme the European Union Eco-Labelling Board
    (EUEB) and the Consultative Forum

6
Lets get in and make it better!(the results II.)
  • Specific advantages aimed at increasing SMEs'
    participation.
  • A minimum and maximum application fee of 300 and
    1300 respectively were fixed. For SMEs this
    application fee is reduced by 25.
  • A minimum and maximum annual fee of 500 and
    25.000 respectively per product group per
    applicant were fixed. For SMEs this annual fee is
    reduced by 25.
  • The annual fee is reduced by 15 for companies
    that have an EMAS registration and/or an EN ISO
    14.000 certification.

7
Lets get in and make it better!(the results
III.)
  • UEAPME was involved in the discussion on the
    first Eco-Label Working Plan
  • some of the new product groups, such as shopping
    bags/plastic bags, building services, dry
    cleaners and vehicle repair services, are
    UEAPMEs proposals

8
Lets get in and make it better!(the results IV.)
  • DG Environment decided to reimburse the travel
    expenses of UEAPMEs experts in the Eco-Label
    AHWGs
  • UEAPME applied twice for a service contract with
    DG Environment in order to represent SMEs in the
    Eco-Label Scheme

9
UEAPMEs tasks
  • Participate in the meetings of the EUEB and CF
  • Submit in advance to these meetings written
    positions on the points of relevance to SMEs or
    to products manufactured by SMEs
  • Nominate technical representatives for the AHWGs
    on product groups relevant to SMEs
  • Promote the Eco-Label and diffuse information
    about Eco-Label to UEAPME members and SMEs

10
12 AHWGs where UEAPME was represented (I)
  • All purpose and sanitary cleaners
  • Bed-mattresses
  • Detergents for dishwashers
  • Dishwashers
  • Footwear
  • Furniture

11
12 AHWGs where UEAPME was represented (II)
  • Hard floor coverings
  • Indoor paints and varnishes
  • Laundry Detergents
  • Light Bulbs
  • Textiles
  • Tourist Accommodation

12
Overview of the results and possible improvements
(I)
  • Excellent collaboration between UEAPME and the
    Eco-Label Team
  • Bottlenecks of the current system
  • UEAPME is only one of the many consultative
    interests groups (consumers, environmental NGOs,
    trade unions, etc)
  • North-South differences among Member States
    difficult to establish common reference products

13
Overview of the results and possible improvements
(II)
  • Preconditions for a better participation of SMEs
    in the Eco-Label Scheme
  • More SME manufactured product/service groups
  • Cut the tests cost to a minimum
  • More return on investments (marketing)
  • Further reduction in fees? (next revision)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com