Title: Summary Diary vs PPM
1A Short Explanation of PPM Radio Measurement
2008
2The Portable People Meter (PPM)
- PPM is electronic measurement that reflects what
you actually do, not what you remember you must
have done - Cell-phone sized device that goes with you every
day, is programmed to record everything you hear
that is encoded - Nearly all stations have encoded their
over-the-air and online content - Downloads every night, sends data to Arbitron to
process - Instead of new people every week, theres a panel
of people balanced to represent the market that
stays in place for up to 2 years - Currently in 8 markets. Will be in top 10 by
early 2009. Will be in top 25 by 2010. - Like Nielsens Local People Meter, the
measurement system changes the ways people
actually have always used radio doesnt
3The Big Changes
- More timely information -- PPM data is refreshed
each month so you can get a faster read on
changes in the market - Since sample doesnt change every week, ratings
remain steady and better reflect peoples actual
habits and usage patterns - Data is available throughout the year, 52 weeks,
13 reports - PPM picks up occasional, unintended as well as
regular, habitual listening, resulting in higher
cumes, but lower AQH ratings than by Diary
methodology - But -- the PPM AQH audience composition is nearly
identical to the Diary reports. So every spot
you air is mostly reaching the stations core
audience. - We are able to see that people who are employed
full time listen to more radio than those who
dont work - AQH listening is about 30 higher for men overall
than women - Hispanics and Blacks have higher listening levels
than others in PPM - Sports Ratings become real
- Special events or specific program ratings become
real - Now includes measurement of 6-11 year olds
4Why Do the Ratings Go Down?
- Total listening time was overstated
(mis-remembered) in Diary - Total number of stations heard is understated in
Diary - About 15 of Diaries reported listening of 25
hours to a single station, while PPM reports only
4 of panelists listen that long. So a lot of
listening time reported by the Diary will not
show up in PPM. - Overall, PPM reports people spent less actual
time with radio than the Diary shows. Divide that
time by double the number of exposures to
different stations, and each stations ratings
will likely be lower in PPM than in Diary
reports. - Diary understated listening by Employed people.
So more PPM ratings are generated by Employed
people than unemployed people. This affects
daypart listening distribution and place of
listening. At home listening is usually to one
station. Out of home listening is to multiple
stations. This means more of the listening
reported is shared among more different stations,
thus likely lowering the AQH for the average
station. - In reality, no radio station LOST listeners, no
one really listened more or less than before the
switch to PPM. Just the measurement system is
different. - So, in PPM, Reach goes up
- Diary reflected only about half of the number of
people who actually tuned into a radio station in
a given week. - PPM reflects all the people who were exposed to
the station, not just those who remembered to
report their listening. - Buying even a few Radio stations generates reach
that actually surpasses newspapers, cable
stations and even most TV stations.
5The Longer They Listen, the More Likely They
Represent the Stations Target Listener
WMGK-FMClassic Rock
Composition
Source Arbitron, January 2007 PPM, Philadelphia
Metro, Persons 6.
6Reaching More Comparison of Diary to PPM
Schedule
Diary
Winter 2007 Diary Persons 25-54
PPM
PPM November 2007 January 2008 Avg Persons
25-54
7Cost Per Point Adjustment
Original buy with Diary
Original buy with PPM
8AQH Rating Index PPM vs. Diary Note That Markets
Differ
Planning Guides Arbitron has created
Conversion Charts for each market
Index PPM v. Diary (AQH Ratings)
The conversion factors will change as markets
mature as PPM markets. Be prepared for change.
Rule of thumb if a schedule works for you
under Diary currency, keep it in place under PPM.
Just think of the lower TRPs as conversion to a
new currency.
1 PPM, New York, October 2007 vs. Fall 2006 Diary
(PPM reported stations) 2 PPM, Philadelphia,
March 2007 vs. Winter 2007 Diary 3 PPM,
Houston-Galveston, March 2007 vs. Winter 2006
Diary
9Summary Diary vs. PPM
PPM
Diary
- Same people every week (avg. term 9 months, max 2
yrs) - 13 reports covering 52 weeks
- Metro only
- Persons 6, in or out of home listening
- Data recorded electronically, actual exposure
- Sports and events individually measurable
- Avg. PPM exposure is to 6 stations/week
- AQH Cume composition dissimilar
- PPM shows shorter TSL on more occasions
- 4 of diaries 100 QH to 1 station
- Core listeners 85 of AQH listening
- More AQH reported by
- Employed
- Hispanics and Blacks
- Males listen 30 more than females
- Listening is more equally distributed across
dayparts, hours, days - All software providers get RLD
- Re-tooled RF Model
- Different people every week
- 4 reports covering 48 week
- Metro, TSA, DMA
- Persons 12, 4 places of listening
- Data based on recall and hand-logging
- Sports and events seldom show up
- Avg. diary listening to 3.2 stations/wk
- AQH Cume composition similar
- Diary shows longer TSL/station
- 15 of diaries 100 QH to 1 station
- Core listeners 85 of AQH listening
- More AQH attributed to
- Unemployed
- Hispanics and Blacks
- Males slightly more than females
- AM drive disproportionately high listening
reported - RLD only on Maximizer/MediaPro
- Standard RF Model
Cannot develop ratings conversion charts until
PPM is live currency in the market
RLD Respondent Level Data