The Neurobehavioural Model of Rehabilitation the BIRT Model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

The Neurobehavioural Model of Rehabilitation the BIRT Model

Description:

May become lost and disorientated in complex or unfamiliar environments ... Introduce a diary for Steve to remember what he has done throughout the day and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2325
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: johnfr4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Neurobehavioural Model of Rehabilitation the BIRT Model


1
The Neurobehavioural Model of Rehabilitationthe
BIRT Model
  • Dr. Miles Rogish
  • Clinical Neuropsychologist

2
Overview
  • An introduction to the services of the Brain
    Injury Rehabilitation Trust (BIRT).
  • An overview of Neurobehavioural Rehabilitation,
    the BIRT treatment model.
  • A brief description of the plans for Springburn
    Project, Glasgow.
  • A case study typical of BIRT clients.

3
  • The Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust (BIRT),
    part of the Disabilities Trust, is a leading
    European provider in specialist brain injury
    rehabilitation.
  • BIRT offers a continuity of post acute care,
    ranging from low secure challenging behaviour
    rehabilitation, to support in the home or
    community based settings.
  • The main treatment model of all BIRT services is
    the Neurobehavioural Model

4
Basics of the Neurobehavioural Model
  • What is Neurobehavioural Rehabilitation?
  • A treatment model for individuals with an
    acquired neurological disability which
    incorporates, neuropsychological, cognitive and
    behavioural theories.

5
  • The Neurobehavioural Model focuses on acquiring
  • everyday life skills
  • social behaviours which are adaptive and lead to
    social integration
  • The primary focus is maximising social
    participation after a neurological impairment
    using learning procedures with less emphasis on
    direct interventions to decrease neurological
    disability.

6
The Neurobehavioural Model (Continued)
  • The Neurobehavioural Model is typically NOT
    Hospital Based.
  • It is community based Social Rehabilitation.

7
Social Rehabilitation
  • Post Acute
  • Community Based
  • Behaviourally Focused
  • Emphasizes skill acquisition
  • Inter-disciplinary
  • Demands a structured environment
  • Based on a continuum of care

8
Aims of Community-Based Rehabilitation
  • Community Reintegration
  • Minimize social handicap
  • Maximise social independence
  • Promote adaptive behaviour
  • Acquisition of socially relevant skills
  • Establish social over-learned skills

9
Key Aspects of Neurobehavioural Rehabilitation
  • Assessment and Treatment in a neurobehavioural
    model requires evidenced based decision making.
  • This is based on key components of learning
    theory as well as behavioural management.
  • The use of psychotropic medications is often
    essential in the rehabilitative treatment
    process.
  • In order to understand and evaluate the
    effectiveness of behavioural and pharmacological
    treatment it is important we quantify behaviours.

10
Recording behaviour
  • What do we record?
  • The frequency of challenging/inappropriate
    behaviours
  • The nature of these behaviours
  • Possible causes or triggers
  • Consequences and outcomes

11
ABC chart example
  • The use of Antecedent Behaviour Consequence (ABC)
    charts allow for detailed analysis of behaviours

12
Example of recorded behaviour
  • Careful analysis of medications and behavioural
    data allow for evidence based decision making

13
Participation Graph
  • Recording of participation allows us to look at
    the clients ability to engage and participation
    in the rehabilitative process.
  • Monitoring of other behavioural date, such as
    time spent out of room, allows measurement of
    observable behaviour that indicates positive
    change.

14
CARF Accreditation
  • CARF is the Commission on Accreditation of
    Rehabilitation Facilities
  • Founded in 1966, CARF is an independent
    non-profit accreditor of human service providers.
  • Mission To promote the quality, value, and
    optimal outcomes of services through a
    consultative accreditation process that centres
    on enhancing the lives of the persons served.

15
  • Surveyors are peers in the field employed by
    organizations that have CARF accreditation and
    who have expertise in the types of programs and
    services accredited by the CARF family of
    organizations.
  • Standards are developed by the CARF International
    Advisory Council advisory committees and
    regional, national, and international focus
    groups each year to review and revise standards
    and develop standards for new accreditation
    opportunities. The standards development process
    provides opportunities for persons served,
    organizations, surveyors, national professional
    groups, advocacy groups, third-party purchasers,
    and other stakeholders to be actively involved in
    developing standards.
  • Standards are not quantitative, but client
    focused and qualitative in nature.

16
The Outcome of a CARF Survey
  • Accreditation by a CARF survey means that a
    service provides EVIDENCED BASED support of
    meeting client centred standards.

17
Evidenced Based Outcomes
18
Seamless Service
  • BIRT emphasizes a Continuum of Care within its
    services
  • Acute medical Care
  • Hospital rehabilitation
  • Behaviour disorder units
  • Community rehabilitation units
  • Slow-stream and residential units
  • Supported housing (outreach) service
  • Support at home
  • Work placement programmes

19
Specialist care within community
  • Care packages are individualized to the specific
    client and family needs.
  • We will work closely with social services to
    develop packages using local resources and BIRT
    resources to maximize quality of life for the
    service user and family system.

20
BIRT Services throughout the UK
21
Springburn Project
  • Set to open Autumn 2009
  • 25 bedded unit, 5 bedded behaviourally acute wing
    and a 20 bed community rehabilitation unit
    (including a self contained flat).
  • Interested in developing a uniquely Scottish
    service with a neurobehavioural treatment model.
  • Wanting to develop links to local services
    including day care services (Gorbals), shared
    posts with local NHS providers, and work
    colaboratively with the NHS (service level
    agreements/partnerships)

22
Springburn Design
23
Progress as of September 2008
24
Case Study
25
Traumatic Brain Injury and History
  • Date of birth 6/12/66
  • Date of admission 28/10/02
  • Sustained a traumatic brain injury in 1985 at the
    age of 18 secondary to TBI
  • Suffered a fractured skull and developed a
    frontal lobe syndrome
  • Difficulties with behavioural control and alcohol
    abuse

26
  • Continued alcohol abuse
  • Formal rehabilitation has been unsuccessful
  • Steve is very close to his family
  • Long history of difficulties with the law and was
    transferred to York House from prison on
    probation

27
Presentation
  • Fully alert and orientated
  • Mostly settled and sociable
  • Short episodes of agitated behaviour, which have
    led to verbal and physical aggression
  • Generally interacts well with staff and clients
  • Spends time in the communal areas of the unit

28
  • When more agitated is unable to accept the value
    of rehabilitation
  • Expresses wish to leave the unit and return to
    his previous lifestyle although he has not
    attempted to do this

29
Overall deficits
  • Physical
  • Epilepsy
  • Retinitis pigmentosa
  • Diabetes
  • Impaired muscle strength in the right upper and
    lower limbs
  • Reduced high level balance

30
  • Behavioural
  • Fluctuating levels of irritability leading to
    verbal and physical aggression
  • Poor impulse control
  • Resistance to the rehab programme
  • Easily bored

31
  • Cognitive
  • Slowed information processing
  • Limited learning capacity
  • Reduced organisation and planning capacity
  • Poor recent memory function

32
Overall strengths
  • Able to focus attention reasonably well
  • Follow simple commands
  • No primary deficits in language or spatial
    abilities and has
  • Insight into his cognitive problems particularly
    poor memory

33
Deficits relating to occupational performance and
independence
34
Morning Routines, Bedroom and Bathroom Clean
  • Able to carry out independently

35
Kitchen Activities
  • Difficulties in planning what he wanted to
    purchase and cook
  • Difficulties organising and sequencing task
    appropriately
  • Unable to read small print on packaging and
    temperature on cooker
  • Difficulties in dividing attention between two
    tasks
  • Perseveration over washing dishes during activity

36
Community Skills
  • Requires extra verbal direction in poor lighting
  • Unable to read small print on products
  • Unable to distinguish receipts etc. from
    money and bus tickets
  • Did not demonstrate effective organisational
    skills when placing small items around his person

37
  • Limited forward planning
  • Potential for becoming over-animated. This
    results in increase in volume and possibly makes
    him the centre of attention
  • Jovial sense of humour can lead to inappropriate
    social comments and behaviour
  • Does not necessarily pick up on verbal cues that
    his interactions may be bordering on socially
    inappropriate

38
Time Management
  • No awareness of his programme or cigarette times.
    Requires prompting to adhere to these
  • Becomes agitated when is not able to follow his
    own very unstructured schedule due to external
    constraints
  • Limited concern for time constraints especially
    when getting up in the morning

39
  • Limited forward planning before till
    transactions, catching buses etc. (i.e. preparing
    his money in advance.)

40
Safety concerns
  • Potential to lose money, and other personal items
  • May become lost and disorientated in complex or
    unfamiliar environments
  • Unable to maintain his personal safety in
    partially lighted/dark environments without
    support

41
  • Dependent on fatigue or sugar levels, may have
    difficulty in maintaining his balance
  • May not pay adequate attention to his diabetic
    status
  • May become vulnerable in community when social
    behaviour borders on inappropriate

42
Recommendations for Rehabilitation
  • Occupational therapy to liase with the Blind
    Society to identify further strategies and
    adaptations that will be of benefit to Steve as
    his eyesight continues to deteriorate
  • To work with Steve in identifying meals that he
    could learn to cook for himself independently

43
  • Introduce an alarm clock that can be used by
    Steve to ensure he wakes in the morning and is
    ready for programmed sessions
  • Introduce a diary for Steve to remember what he
    has done throughout the day and to record what
    meals he has ordered

44
Goals for occupational therapy rehabilitation
  • Plan, purchase and cook three self cater meals
    per week with minimal verbal prompts
  • Catch the bus into town independently
  • Utilise a wallet effectively, consistently
    placing money, receipts and bus tickets in
    separate compartments
  • Utilise diary effectively

45
Psychological Interventions
  • CBT/anger management therapy
  • Use of cue cards and environmental cues to engage
    in adaptive behaviours
  • Incentive based programs to encourage pro-social
    behaviours
  • Social skills practice in group, one on one, and
    community settings.

46
Weekly programme
  • MONDAY Plan self cater Shop for self
    cater Self cater Quaker
    Pantry Letter writing Diary

47
  • TUESDAY Plan community access Group
    Psychology Fitness Diary

48
  • WEDNESDAY Swimming(double session) Bus
    practice Self cater Diary

49
  • THURSDAY Anger management Self
    cater Quaker Pantry Fitness Diary

50
  • FRIDAY Community access (double
    session) Quaker Pantry Bathroom
    clean Diary

51
Course of Treatment
  • Admitted to York House October 2002, 17 years
    post injury.
  • Discharged to TEM House June 2004, after
    approximately a year and a half at York House.
  • Continued community based treatment at TEM house
    for another year and a half, approximately.
  • Discharged to supported community setting, block
    of flats. Still there and living with minimal
    support and no significant behavioural issues.

52
  • Questions and comments?
  • www.birt.co.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com