Title: Examining Teacher Choices In A Multiple Formative Assessment Environment: What Will They Use To Info
1Examining Teacher Choices In A Multiple Formative
Assessment Environment What Will They Use To
Inform Instruction?
- Jane Delgado
- Research Scientist
- K-12 Research Team
- Research and Analysis
- jdelgado_at_collegeboard.org
2Formative Assessment Conceptualizations and Key
Elements
- Feedback is critical, but may vary in
effectiveness. Where the learner should be.
Where the learner is now. How the learner should
get there from here. (Wiliam, D.) - Thought-revealing discourse, analyses of
student work - teacher teacher (teacher learning communities)
- teacher student (engaging instruction)
- student student (collaborative strategies)
- Student self-reflection (building meta-cognition)
- Part of an instructional program (e.g.
SpringBoard)
3SpringBoard
- Rigorous content, articulated from sixth grade
through twelfth grade in both English language
arts and mathematics. - Model instructional units and lessons engaging
and interactive, introducing knowledge and skills
in manageable steps. - Aligned to the College Board Standards for
College Success the knowledge, skills and
abilities necessary for success in college and
AP. - Multiple opportunities to apply research-based
strategies in reading, writing, oral proficiency,
collaboration and problem-solving. - Teacher professional development institutes and
workshops that are designed to exemplify the
strategic learning framework. - 24-hour access to materials, exemplary student
work, coaching and mentoring online. - Balanced multiple assessment environment.
4Strategic Learning Model SpringBoard
Adapted from Anna Uhl Chamot and Michael
OMalley, The CALLA Handbook How to Implement
the Cognitive Academic Language Learning
Approach, 1994.
5SpringBoard Balanced Multiple Assessment
Environment
- Instructional Discourse Interactive lessons
offer opportunities to review student work,
monitor student talk, and observe cognitive
organization - Embedded Standardized formative performance
tasks with scoring rubrics are embedded in each
lesson. Student self-reflection is structured at
intervals. - Student Portfolios are encouraged and structured
- Computer-based diagnostic assessments can be
used interactively online, or can be downloaded
and printed out. Printed tests can be hand
scored or scanned and data entered.
6SpringBoard Assessment Structure
7Mini-Studies on Implementation
- Mini-Study 1 During the first full year of
implementation for grades six through twelve in
English language arts and mathematics, surveys
were administered to a random sample of 800
teachers in the 28 participating districts.
Teachers responding 420 (52) - Mini-Study 2 Follow-up implementation surveys
were mailed to 4,024 participating teachers in 56
participating districts at the end of the second
year of implementation. Teachers responding to
date 978 (24)
8Research Questions
- What formative assessments will teachers use most
often? - What factors are related to the teachers choice
of assessment? - How do teachers use the information to adjust
instruction? - What instructional information is used most
successfully to boost achievement? - What can Districts and States do to support
successful use of assessment opportunities in
making instructional decisions?
9Question One What assessments will teachers use
most often?
10Question Two What factors are related to the
teachers choice of assessment?
- Enthusiasm for the program
- Frequent use of the program
- Subject matter English or mathematics
- School type Middle school or high school
- Time to plan with other teachers
- The program is a key component of the district
curriculum - Support from the other teachers at the school
- Support from the school administration
- Access to computers
11Factor Enthusiasm for the program
plt.05, p lt.01, ns not significant
12Factor Frequent use of the program
plt.05, p lt.01, ns not significant
13Factor Subject matter - English or mathematics
plt.05, p lt.01, ns not significant
14Factor School type Middle school or high
school
plt.05, p lt.01, ns not significant
15Factor Time to plan with other teachers
plt.05, p lt.01, ns not significant
16Factor Support from other teachers
plt.05, p lt.01, ns not significant
17Factor Support from the administration
plt.05, p lt.01, ns not significant
18Factor The program is a key component of the
district curriculum
plt.05, p lt.01, ns not significant
19Factor Teacher access to computers
plt.05, p lt.01, ns not significant
20Factor Student access to computers
plt.05, p lt.01, ns not significant
21Key Predictors, Regression Models
- Embedded Assessments R2 .115
- Frequent use of printed materials, middle school
teachers, time to plan with other teachers - Sequenced Diagnostic Assessments R2 .113
- Frequent use of printed materials, student access
to computers, support from other teachers at my
school, SpringBoard is a key component at my
district - Pre-defined Diagnostic Assessments R2 .022
- Student access to computers
- Customized Diagnostic Assessments R2 .037
- Student access to computers, mathematics
teachers, frequent use of printed materials - Student Portfolio Assessments R2 .263
- Frequent use of printed materials, English
teachers, middle school teachers, support from
the administration
Stepwise variable inclusion
22Preliminary Conclusions and Theories to Explore
Further
- Ease of use matters, especially in the beginning
of a program. - Teachers want assessments that are aligned to the
curriculum, not just to standards. - Teachers want control over access to the results.
- English teachers and mathematics teachers are not
the same. - Administrative support helps, but maybe not as
much as assuring teachers that the program is KEY
in your district. - For computer-based assessments, student access to
computers is still an issue. - Use of assessments will grow through District
mandate or as teachers become more familiar with
the process and get trained in the use of
assessments.