Title: Lattice vs. LennardJones models with a net particle flow
1Lattice vs. Lennard-Jones models with a net
particle flow
Manuel DÃez-Minguito, Pedro L. Garrido, and
JoaquÃn Marro
Institute Carlos I for Theoretical and
Computational Physics, and Departamento de
Electromagnetismo y FÃsica de la Materia
University of Granada, Spain (http//ergodic.ugr
.es)
2Outline
- Objetives (Sims Theory)
- Influence of dynamic details on the resulting
non-equilibrium steady state (critical
properties). - Similarities and differences between a lattice
model and its continuous (off-lattice)
counterpart.
- Clue
- Spatial discretization changes morphology and
induce an spurious phase diagram.
1.- Driven Lattice Gas (DLG) 2.- DLG
robustness 3.- Analog off-lattice model 4.-
Transport and critical behavior 5.- Conclusions
3Driven Lattice Gas (DLG)
N, 2D lattice, PBCs
S.Katz, J. L. Lebowitz, and H. Spohn, J. Stat.
Phys. 34, 497 (1984)
MC simulations (biased Metropolis rule)
(hops against the field forbidden)
particle
hole
- A net current and a straight interface set in.
- 2nd order phase transition
robustness?
4NN
NNN
5Driven Lennard-Jones Fluid (i)
MC sims biased Metropolis rate (Preferential
hopping),
- Condensed and vapor phases segregate
- 2nd order phase transition at (Tc,rc)
6Driven Lennard-Jones Fluid (ii)
Lattice cases enhanced interfacial
conduction. Off-lattice case mostly bulk
conduction.
Critical behavior is consistent with bIsing1/8,
but not with bDLG1/3 or bMF1/2.
7Conclusions
- Our study reveals that spatial discretization
will often modify the resulting morphological
properties and even induce different criticality. - In particular, the critical behavior of the
driven LJ model is consistent with the Ising one
(bIsing1/8), but not with its natural lattice
analog (bDLG1/3). - This is puzzling in the context of statistical
field theory given that symmetries seem to bring
the off-lattice model closer to the driven
lattice gas than to the equilibrium Ising model.
The additional freedom of the off-lattice case is
likely to matter more than suggested by intuition.
(4) Achahbar and MDM (unpublished)
(2) Achahbar et al. PRL 87, 195702 (2001).
(1) F. de los Santos et al. Physica A 296, 364
(2001).
(3) MDM et al. PRE 72, 026103 (2005).