Deuterium trapping in tungsten damaged by highenergy hydrogen ion irradiation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Deuterium trapping in tungsten damaged by highenergy hydrogen ion irradiation

Description:

SIMS/NRA measurements. NRA was used for absolute calibration. TDS measurements ... 2.1eV (voids)* Diffusion coeff.: Fraunfelder's. Trapping rate: De-trapping rate: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: mfuku
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Deuterium trapping in tungsten damaged by highenergy hydrogen ion irradiation


1
Deuterium trapping in tungsten damaged by
high-energy hydrogen ion irradiation
  • M. Fukumoto, H. Kashiwagi, Y. Ohtsuka, Y. Ueda
  • Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka
    University
  • M. Taniguchi, T. Inoue, K. Sakamoto, J. Yagyu,
    T. Arai
  • Japan Atomic Energy Agency
  • I. Takagi
  • Graduate School of Engineering, Kyoto
    University
  • T. Kawamura, N. Yoshida
  • Interdisciplinary Graduate School of
    Engineering Sciences, Kyushu University

2
Outline of this talk
  • Background and Purpose of this study
  • Experimental sequence
  • Experimental results
  • D concentration in damaged W
  • Effects of annealing on D retention
  • TDS profiles as a function of incident fluence
  • Preliminary TMAP7 simulation
  • Conclusion

3
Background and Purpose of this study
  • Background of this study
  • In ITER, W is a candidate PFM for diverter region
  • Extensive studies have been made for undamaged
    W
  • In DT fusion phase, fast neutrons are generated
  • W is simultaneously irradiated by hydrogen
    isotopes and neutrons
  • Interaction between radiation-induced defects and
    hydrogen isotope in W materials is very important
  • Trapping, release, and diffusion in damaged W are
    not clear
  • Purpose of this study
  • Investigation of deuterium behavior in damaged W
  • D depth distribution and desorption
    characteristics

4
Experimental sequence
  • Damage Creation
  • Ion energy 300 keV H-
  • Pulse duration 1 s every 60 s (1000 shots)
  • Temperature below 473 K (to avoid recovery of
    defects)
  • D implantation
  • Ion energy 1.0 keV (D, D2, and D3 were
    contained)
  • Fluence 0.5 x 1024 8.0 x 1024 D/m2
  • Temperature 473 K
  • SIMS/NRA measurements
  • NRA was used for absolute calibration
  • TDS measurements
  • 1 K/s, R.T. 1100 K
  • W samples
  • Hot rolled and stress relived
  • Mirror-polished less than 0.01 mm roughness

5
D distribution as a function of fluence
  • Fluence 0.5 8.0 x 1024 D/m2
  • Temp. 473 K
  • Damage 4.8 dpa
  • D conc. near surface was saturated at 5.0x1023
    D/m2
  • D conc. 0.9x1027 D/m3
  • Trap density
  • 0.014 traps/W
  • Production rate
  • 0.014 traps/Wdpa
  • Similar to 800 MeV p damage
  • 0.01 traps/Wdpa
  • D conc. at 1.0 µm was not saturated up to
    8.0x1024 D/m2
  • B.M. Oliver et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 307-311
    (2002) 1418.

6
Effects of 673 K annealing on D trapping
  • Fluence 5.0 x 1024 D/m2
  • Temp. 473 K
  • Damage 4.9 dpa
  • D concentration was decreased by annealing at 673
    K for 1 h.
  • Change of surface density
  • 0.8x1027 gt 0.6x1027 D/m2
  • 20 reduction
  • Most of self-interstitials could be eliminated.
  • Vacancy type defects are still remained.
  • M. J. Attard et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 19,
    (1967) 73.

7
Effects of 1173 K annealing on D trapping
  • Fluence 5.0 x 1023 D/m2
  • Temp. 473 K
  • Damage 4.4 dpa
  • D conc. was also decreased by annealing at 1173K
    for 1h.
  • Change of surface density
  • 0.9x1027 gt 0.2x1027 D/m2
  • 80 reduction (near surface)
  • Single vacancies could be annealed by this heat
    treatment
  • Voids formation could be still take place
  • D. Jeannotte et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 19,
    (1967) 232.
  • H. Eleveld et al., J.N.M., 212-215, (1994)
    1421.

8
TDS spectra of two samples
  • Fluence 5.0 x 1024 D/m2
  • Temp. 473 K
  • Fitted by Gaussian functions.
  • Peak 1 770 K
  • Peak 2 860 K
  • Peak 3 920 K
  • Damaged W has much higher D desorption

Undamaged W
4.8 dpa damaged W
9
Fluence dependence of each peak
  • Fluence 0.5 8.0 x 1024 D/m2
  • Temp. 473 K
  • Damage 4.8 dpa
  • Damaged samples
  • Peak 1 (770 K)
  • one order of magnitude higher than undamaged
    sample
  • increased with fluence
  • Peak 2 (860 K)
  • same as undamaged sample
  • constant with fluence
  • Peak 3 (920 K)
  • only damaged samples
  • increased with fluence
  • D was trapped at the defects related to Peak 1
    (770 K) and Peak 3 (920 K)

10
D distribution simulated by TMAP7
  • Simulation conditions
  • Trap energy1.34eV(vacancies)
  • 2.1eV (voids)
  • Diffusion coeff. Fraunfelders
  • Trapping rate
  • De-trapping rate
  • Distribution TRIM-88
  • Trap density
  • 0.014 traps/Wdpa
  • Other conditions same as exp.
  • D trapping proceeds from surface trapping sites
  • All trap sites were filled less than 6.0 x 1022
    D/m2
  • Much lower than exp. results (8.0 x 1024 D/m2)
  • TMAP7 results did not agree with exp. results
  • M. Poon et al., JNM, 374 (2008) 390.

11
Conclusion
  • Deuterium depth profiles
  • D conc. near surface was saturated at 5.0x1023
    D/m2
  • Damage production rate was similar to 800 MeV p
    irradiated W
  • D conc. at 1.0 mm was increased but not
    saturated up to 8.0x1024 D/m2
  • Preliminary TMAP7 simulation did not reproduce
    exp. results
  • Effect of annealing
  • Annealing at 673 K for 1 h decreased D retention
    by 20
  • Annealing at 1173 K for 1 h decreased D retention
    by 80
  • TDS measurements
  • D was trapped at the radiation induced defects
    associated with Peak 1 (770 K) and Peak 3 (920
    K)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com