Title: MPAS 2004 Contemporary Chinese Politics and Society
1MPAS 2004Contemporary Chinese Politics and
Society
- 9.1. INTRODUCTION - A FRAMEWORK TO ANALYSE
STATE-SOCIETY - RELATIONS IN THE PRC PARTY-STATE, FACTIONALISM
AND - TRANSITION FROM A TOTALITARIAN TO
POST-TOTALITARIAN REGIME - 16.1. POLITICS OF REFORM 1976-2007
- 23.1. ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION THE NATURE OF THE
ECONOMIC - MIRACLE. FILM I 10-12, CEAS SEMINAR ROOM
- 30.1. SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION I NEW SOCIAL
STRUCTURE, SOCIAL - MOBILITY, THE NEW MIDDLE CLASSES? FILM II
12-14, CEAS SEMINAR ROOM (N.B. TIME) - 6.2. SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION II SOCIAL COSTS AND
ACCOMPLISHMENTS, - GROWTH WITH DISPARITY. FILM III 10-12, CEAS
SEMINAR ROOM - 13.2. EMERGING SOCIAL FORCES I PROTEST. FILM IV
10-12, CEAS SEMINAR ROOM - 20.2. EMERGING SOCIAL FORCES II MEDIA AND THE
INTERNET. FILM V 10-12, CEAS SEMINAR ROOM - 27.2. THE PARTY IN THE REFORM PERIOD THE
STABILITY OF POST-TOTALITARIAN REGIME OR WILL THE
CCP SURVIVE THE REFORMS? FILM VI 10-12, CEAS
SEMINAR ROOM - I EXAM 5.3 II EXAM 14.3., III EXAM Spare exam
(rästitentti) in June - The course also includes Dr. Ma Weihong EMERGING
SOCIAL FORCES III NGOS AND THE STATE (Virtual
audio lecture)
2INTRODUCTION
- Aims of the course The course introduces the
students to the political, social, and economic
issues and developments during the reform period
in China (1978 - ). This is done through
focusing on the state-society relationship during
the period and employing a concept of regime
transition form a totalitarian to a
post-totalitarian regime, which connects the
political transformation to the larger social and
economic transition.
3INTRODUCTION
- The reform period (1978 present) in China has
been one of the greatest successes stories in the
World economic history - Has changed Chinese economic and social
structures profoundly and created pressures for
political reforms - An uneven and complex process
4INTRODUCTION
- The course introduces the historical background
of the reforms and their economic, social and
political consequences to contemporary Chinese
society - Party-oriented approach what, why and how has
the CCP done in order to reform Chinese economy
and how has this changed Chinese society? - How has the Party responded to the social changes
the reforms have produced? - Will the Party survive its own reforms?
5INTRODUCTION
- The starting point for the reforms is/was the
Maoist state created under the leadership of Mao
Zedong after the revolution in 1949 - Historically unique starting points lead to
historically unique outcomes - The course begins with introduction to the Maoist
state and politics during it - The basic concepts that help to grasp the nature
of mainland Chinese society and politics - Party-State
- Totalitarianism
- Factionalism
6INTRODUCTION THE CONCEPTS
- PARTY-STATE
- The Chinese Communist Party came to power in
China through revolution in 1949 after almost 30
years of armed struggle - The Republic of China (ROC) fled to Taiwan and
was replaced with the Peoples Republic of China
with proletarian dictatorship (also peoples
dictatorship) - Republican in form, but in effect a party-state
dominated by the Chinese Communist Party, CCP
(???, Gongchangdang)
7INTRODUCTION THE PARTY-STATE
- A Leninist construction, modelled after the
Soviet example and advice - The leading party pervades all other formal
institutions in the polity - All levels of government down to the villages,
enterprises and civic organisations have a dual
structure of administrative organs and respective
party cells - Since 1949 the Party has been the de facto leader
on all administrative levels and social units
8INTRODUCTION THE PARTY-STATE
Figure 1.) The dual structure of party-state in
China
9Picture 1) PRC and Its Provinces, Autonomous
Regions and Directly Ruled Metropolitan Cities
HK and Macau SARs (Taiwan / Republic of China
Arguable)
10INTRODUCTION THE PARTY-STATE
- There is a corresponding Party organisation on
every level of government - The Party Centre Central Party units
- Central Committee, Politburo and its Standing
Committee - In history Party Centre has referred to few
leading cadres or simply to Mao - Party-state has 25-30 leading positions that form
the elite of decision making - From provinces down, party committees under party
secretaries are decisive bodies
11INTRODUCTION THE PARTY-STATE
- The Party dominance based on two factors
- Decides policy lines (what the party-state does)
- Upholds nomenklatura i.e. a list of candidates
for leading positions in party-state (who does
what in the party-state) - Some 95 of all leadership positions in the
government manned by party members - gt The Communist Party is the key organization in
Chinese politics, understanding how it works is
paramount for understanding Chinese politics
12INTRODUCTION TOTALITARIANISM
- But why politics is important to understand
Chinese society and its change? - TOTALITARIANISM
- Officially, the PRC has had a multi-party system
since 1949 - There are 8 other officially sanctioned smaller
parties, but the principle of mutual existence
and supervision is not carried out in reality - During the Mao period China was a totalitarian
one-party state - The guiding organizational principle was Leninism
- Vanguard Party assuming the leadership at all
fronts of social life
13INTRODUCTION TOTALITARIANISM
- Totalitarianism a problematic concept
- Originally devised to denigrate those regimes it
has been attached to - In the Cold War atmosphere the journalistic
concept was picked up as a concept in political
science and attributed also to the PRC - Based on seeing all socialist countries forming a
monolith block led from Moscow and hostile to the
Free World
14INTRODUCTION TOTALITARIANISM
- A classic treatise on the totalitarian
syndrome, or model, was offered by Carl J.
Friedrich and Zbigniew K. Brzezinski (1966) - 6 features
- 1) An elaborative transformative ideology
- 2) A ruling single mass party led by one man
- 3) Use of physical and mental terror against the
enemies of the system - 4) A technologically conditioned, near-complete
monopoly of control, in the hands of the party or
the government, of all means of effective mass
communication, such as the press, radio, and
motion pictures
15INTRODUCTION TOTALITARIANISM
- 5) A similarly technologically conditioned,
near-complete monopoly of the effective use of
weapons of armed combat - 6) Central control of the economy
- The totalitarian model came under severe
criticism by the late 70s for its inability to
explain the internal developments of the
socialist regimes and how these regimes actually
worked in Eastern Europe and China
16INTRODUCTION TOTALITARIANISM
- Sujian Guo (1998)
- Totalitarian regime identity can be defined
through hard core elements of a system - 1) An absolutist ideology and inevitable goal
- 2) Ideological commitment
- 3) A dictatorial party-state system
- The internal structure of the regime or its
ability to carry out policies in practise do not
determine its nature as such
17INTRODUCTION TOTALITARIANISM
- For a system to be totalitarian more important
than the exact nature of the institutions of
dictatorship, are the regimes relation to the
rest of the society - Totalitarian regime does not bind or limit itself
legally (rule of law), or politically (democratic
elections, free press) - High degree of state penetration in all sectors
of civic life, economy, and total control of
organised politics
18INTRODUCTION TOTALITARIANISM
- Forced-draft campaigns for ideologically induced
social transformation - Seeking to create a new society on a scale that
calls for massive social renovation and a
recasting of the division of labour - Creating a new world
- It follows that in totalitarian societies the
state plays central role in social development
(for good and bad)
19INTRODUCTION POST-TOTALITARIANISM
- POST-TOTALITARIANISM
- Robert Tucker (1961) A totalitarian regime based
on a revolutionary movement may go through
alteration of its dynamism as a result of a
qualitative change in the motivation of
revolutionary politics - Losing the faith in ideology and thereby
commitment to social transformation
20INTRODUCTION POST-TOTALITARIANISM
- In post-totalitarian order ideology no longer has
any great influence on people, but ideology still
plays its legitimizing part in the system - People do not have to believe in the system, they
merely have to comply with it to a degree that
does not jeopardize the official truth - The political order no longer actively controls
everything it can it is sufficient to only
control what is seen as necessary for the
perpetuation of the system
21INTRODUCTION POST-TOTALITARIANISM
- The order has ceased to use ideology as the basis
of its goal setting - No more forced-draft campaigns
- A retreat from socially dominant positions in
many sectors observed - Political control remains intact
- The ruling party chooses what it wants to control
22INTRODUCTION POST-TOTALITARIANISM
- Criticism against seeing the PRC a totalitarian
state - Vivienne Shue (1988) The PRC was not a monolith,
it was unable to fully indoctrinate its citizens,
subcultures and resistance did not disappear - All this is true, yet Maoist state did penetrate
widely in the society, politicized every aspect
of human life, and suppressed all independent
civic activities while carrying out costly
attempts of total social transformation - May have been incomplete, but did fit the Sujian
Guos model
23INTRODUCTION POST-TOTALITARIANISM
- Maoist state has changed notably after Maos
death, and it is this change and its consequences
is precisely what this course traces - But how to explain the change, what created
political dynamism in totalitarian /
post-totalitarian setting?
24INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- FACTIONAL MODEL
- China has a dictatorial one-party system, but the
Party is hardly a monolith - One explanation of the inner working of the Party
is to see the its leadership functioning after
factional model (which comes with variations) - Factions informal groupings of leading cadres
that centre around a leadership figure, based on
ties of mutual benefits, usually having the same
place of origin or other affiliation, patronage
relationships, etc. - Factions exist at all levels, the central level
factions most well known
25INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Factionalism has a long historical background
- The Party that came to power in 1949 was divided
into semi-autonomous field armies with strong
leaders (shantou, mountain tops) - Transferring these leaders to civilian offices
created independent kingdoms in many sectors - Legacy has lived on, as power struggle between
factional alliances has became the rule of the
game in cadre politics that factional leaders
have to play or perish (or play and perish
nevertheless)
26INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Factions are formally banned for splitting the
Party - Means that open factionalism is not tolerated
- Factions do not have formal organisations
(compare to Japan and Taiwan, where factions are
formalised within multi-party systems) - In reality factions are endemic in the
party-state and even its necessary outcome
27INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Factions are seen to be based on wider cultural
dispositions - Guanxi (??, connections) networks important to
explain factions - Factionalism an extension of guanxi to politics
- Nathan (1973) Nature of guanxi ties
- Relation is established personally between a
patron and client (clientilist networks)
28INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- It is especially appreciated and kept alive
through exchange of gifts, services, etc - It usually collapses, if the flow of these
benefits stops - Relation is often uneven, as its parties have
different resources to draw to - The relationship creates rights and obligations
(unwritten, but recognised by both parties) to
its members
29INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Relationship can be broken by both parties and
they can seek other similar relations as long as
they are not mutually contradictory - There are other kinds of important relations in
Chinese culture, such as kinship, clan
membership, corporate membership, etc. - These can be important in politics as well, but
are not factional relations by definition (they
can be their basis, though)
30INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- In every day Chinese a faction (??, zongpai)
refers to almost any political grouping
regardless on what kind of relations it is based
on - Here faction refers to a leadership faction
- Factions can also form factional coalitions and
alliances which are referred to as factions in
common speech
31INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- A Leadership factional relation is based on
guanxi, but it is more binding than normal-day
guanxi relation - Based on mutual political interests
- Breaking the tie may cause difficulties, even
peril, to both of its parties - All its members are in leading political
positions (relatively speaking) - Direct relations usually only with leader -
subleader
32INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Network can be expanded up or downwards
- A subleader should not seek other factional
alignments - In Party politics, the leader with most factional
following is dominant - Subleaders may defect to other factions
- Most stable factions are therefore found within
same organisations of the leader-subleader, where
flow of benefits can be steady
33INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Factions can have their inner tensions
(subleaders struggling over access to the
leader), but competition against the other
factions keeps them together - Stable factionalist systems possible when there
is a broad enough consensus on common ideological
goals - Otherwise, factions would split and begin open
rivalry
34INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Nevertheless factionalist struggle usually
appears doctrinal - The struggle goes on under the guise of high
ideological rhetoric where factional differences
are blown bigger and matters of principle
emphasised - In reality, real ideological differences small
- Factionalist politics calls for compromise
politics and recurrent crisis in policy making
35INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Factionalist politics targets persons
- Opponents are weakened by attacking leading
figures, or their subordinates - Compare to the dance of factions in East Asian
liberal politics - See pictures
36Picture 2) Factionalism Changes History Mao
Zedong with and without his factional rival Peng
Zhen (Source Kiinan vuosisata, Tammi 1996, 186)
37Picture 1) Who is missing the Party? An altered
picture on official mourning of Chairman Mao at
Tiananmen Square1976 The Gang of Four has
been removed.
38INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- What explains factions (Jing Huang 2000)
- 1) Policy choice model
- 2) Institutional interests model
- 3) Power struggle model
- Policy choice model policy differences between
leaders create factions (factions are opinion
groups) - Institutional interests model conflicts of
bureaucratic interests create basis for
factionalism (fragmented authoritarianism) - Power struggle model constant need to secure
offices and career advancement creates incentive
for factionalism
39INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Huang Jing 2000
- Factionalism is the reason, not the consequence
of power struggles - Policy choices manipulated for factional
interests, not the other way around - Bureaucratic interests may coincide with
factionalist interests, but factionalism (power
considerations, interests of factional guanxi
networks) are independent from bureaucratic
interests
40INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- A dictatorial one-party system is conducive to
factionalism for 4 reasons - Power is wielded through and by individual
leaders in strictly hierarchical organisation - The party-state monopolizes all channels of
communication and interest articulation - Formal decision making procedures exist, but
rules are not binding to leaders (weak
institutions) - Role of the army has been historically speaking
strong in Chinese politics
41INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Factions serve certain functions to their members
- They are exclusive channels of communication and
information - They make interest articulation and aggregation
possible - They serve as command structures
42INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Factions and policy making
- There can be genuine policy disagreements between
factions, but usually cadre politics (i.e.
competition over leadership positions) is the key
issue in factional infightings - In Chinese politics policies are carried out not
only through decrees, but, as importantly,
through right persons in key positions - Impossible to separate policy issues from cadre
politics in factional struggles
43INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Guanxi is the decisive factor in cadre politics
- Leaders build their networks on personal
relations - Dismantling opponents guanxi networks also
important - As noted, all leading cadres are nominated (not
elected) to their positions from above - Some formal rules and criteria apply, but
political consideration is the decisive factor - Appointments bring factional relations to the open
44INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Formal decision making structures, institutions,
are damaging to factionalism - In policy process factionalism can create
instability - Especially if there is imbalance in factional
strengths - It also creates inconsistency factional leaders
can oppose policies they would support on
ideological grounds and vice versa
45INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Totalitarianism and factionalism?
- Lieberthal (1995) China is ruled under
fragmented authoritarianism - China is ruled through centralized authoritarian
political system, but the complexities of the
party-state bureaucratic structure fragment
actual power to many layers and separate
organisations - Deficiencies of communication and scarcity of
reliable information add to this
46INTRODUCTION FACTIONALISM
- Totalitarianism refers to the state-society
relations, not the internal working of
party-state, which can be fragmented and
competitive, but still totalitarian - Bottlenecks and stalemates of decision making
usual in such a political system and call for
factionalism - Going through back-door, not through formal
channels becomes a tempting option - Strong leaders required to informally solve
bureaucratic squabbles
47INTRODUCTION CONCLUSION
- - Factions belong to all party systems, but under
an one-party system they can destabilise the
national (party) leadership that supposedly
functions as a collective - In Chinese history since 1949 factional conflicts
have been many times solved not through
compromise, but purges (especially under Mao
Zedong) - Occasionally the Party has even been on the verge
of collapse due to factionalist infighting (the
Cultural Revolution 1966-1976, 1989)
48INTRODUCTION CONCLUSION
- Chinese contemporary history demonstrates how
factionalist struggles in the Party leadership
have also been over political lines - Have set the pulse of Chinese politics
- In a totalitarian setting, social transformation
has followed Party decisions - Next lecture introduces politics of reform and
then we move on to their consequences