Individuals and international law - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Individuals and international law

Description:

1. Human rights and municipal law rights of individuals against the abuses of gov't. ... English division of powers unwritten Const. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: anitahal
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Individuals and international law


1
Individuals and international law
  • Lecture 22
  • March 9

2
ASSIGNMENTS-1
  • March 11
  • International Criminal Law p.395
  • ICC http//www.icc-cpi.int/Menus/ICC/
  • Rome Statute of the ICC http//www.icc-cpi.int/NR
    /rdonlyres/EA9AEFF7-5752-4F84-BE94-0A655EB30E16/0/
    Rome_Statute_English.pdf
  • You need to read Articles 1-21, at least.
  • Find out which article states that ICC takes
    cases where the state is unwilling or unable to
    prosecute
  • Who are the judges of the ICC -
    http//www.icc-cpi.int/chambers/judges.htmlfdd
  • MARCH 16 Quiz-3
  • Wednesday, April 1 Guest Speaker
  • Professor Kanner Terrorism and International
    Law
  • Attendance compulsory
  • Today
  • Individuals and International Law

3
International Human Rights Law (Background
information)
  • 1. Human rights and municipal law rights of
    individuals against the abuses of govt.
  • - Locke English philosopher social compact-
    Two Treatises of Government 1690 - human rights
    not govt came first social compact for the
    mutual preservation of their lives,
    liberties and estates
  • - English division of powers unwritten Const.
    was elaborated and popularized by French
    philosopher Montesquieu, then Rousseau talked of
    the revolutionary potential of human rights.
  • Followed by democratic revolutions in America -
    US Declaration of Independence and throughout
    Europe.

4
UN Charter
  • UN Charter Art. 1, para.3 one of its principle
    purposes the promotion and protection of human
    rights.
  • UN Charter Art. 55 and 56 foundation of modern
    human rights law.
  • Quick emergence of the rules of intl human rights
    law
  • But development of effective intl hum rights
    legal process more gradual
  • - creating enforcement mechanisms at the level
    of UN
  • - regional human rights systems, especially
    Europe

5
Human Rights
  • What part of the UN Charter could be used to
    argue against human rights?
  • Interference in domestic affairs

6
International Bill of Rightshttp//www.unhchr.ch/
html/intlinst.htm
  • 1. Universal Declaration on Human Rights 1948
    UNGA adopted it unanimously
  • 2. Intl Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
    1966 US is a party
  • 3. Int Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
    Rights 1966 US not a party
  • Optional Protocol to the Civil and Political
    Covenant US not a party
  • Second Optional Protocol to the Civil and
    Political Covenant Aiming at the Abolition of the
    Death Penalty - US not a party

7
Treaty-based and charter-based bodies
  • Treaty-based
  • Human Rights Committee
  • - Art. 28 International Covenant on Civil and
    Political Rights
  • Charter-based Rights
  • Commission on Human Rights
  • - established by ECOSOC in 1946
  • Replaced by the Human Rights Council established
    by General Assembly resolution in2006

8
International Human Rights Law
  • 1st generation of rights
  • Intl Covenant on Civil and polit rights
  • 2nd generation of rights
  • Int Covenant on economic, social, and cultural
    rights
  • 3rd generation rights
  • no covenant - collective rights to peace,
    development, and a healthy environment

9
Regional Human Rights Entities
  • Organization of American States
  • Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
    Washington D.C.
  • Inter-American Court on Human Rights - San
    Jose, Costa Rica
  • Council of Europe
  • European Court of Human Rights

10
Organization of American StatesHuman Rights
Branch
  • A. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
    seven members
  • 1) Receives petitions from individuals
  • 2) Can publish a report of its recommendations
    or to take the case to the
  • B. Inter-American Court on Human Rights
    established 1979
  • only receives cases from the Commission or
    States, not individuals

11
OASLegal Instruments on Human Rights
  • American Declaration of Rights and Duties of Man
    (American Declaration) adopted 1948
  • The American Convention on Human Rights 25
    parties (US is not a Party)

12
European Human Rights Law
  • What is the difference between the Council of the
    European Union, the European Council and the
    Council of Europe?  Which one adopted the
  • European Convention on Human Rights

13
European Institutions
  • Distinguish between
  • EU (European Union) institutions -
    Council of the European Union
  • (legislative arm of EU, together with EU
    Parliament) - European Council meeting of
    heads of state of EU members
  • Council of Europe (separate organization)
    adopted the
  • - The European Convention on Human Rights in
    1950

14
Council of Europe
  • Adopted the European Convention on Human Rights
    in 1950
  • http//www.coe.int
  • International organization in its own right. Its
    headquarters are in Strasbourg.
  • 47 member states including all EU states
  • Any European state can become a member of the
    Council of Europe provided it accepts the
    principle of the rule of law and guarantees human
    rights and fundamental freedoms to everyone under
    its jurisdiction

15
European Court of Human Rights
  • Individuals can bring a case directly

16
Soering case
  • Issue Would the extradition of an applicant to a
    state where he faces capital murder charges
    (possible death penalty) violate his human rights
    under the European Convention on Human Rights
    (art.3)

17
Soering case
  • IN the event of the alleged criminals
    extradition, there would be a violation of Art.3
    of the Europ. Conv. on HR. The Ct. ruled that
    under Art. 3 of the Europ. Conv. on HR the UK
    could not extradite a person to the US to be
    tried for a capital offense because of the
    possibility real risk - that upon conviction
    the person would be confined on death row which
    is inhuman and degrading and would violate Art.
    3.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com