Informing Instruction and Reflecting Instruction: The Two Faces of Assessment PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 21
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Informing Instruction and Reflecting Instruction: The Two Faces of Assessment


1
Informing Instruction and Reflecting
InstructionThe Two Faces of Assessment
  • Kimberly Hambrick, Ph.D. (hambrick_at_ael.org)
  • Institute for the Advancement
  • of Research in Education
  • at AEL
  • Presented as part of panel discussion (Using Data
    as a Tool in Education) at CoSN
  • March 2, 2004

2
Purposeful Student Assessment
  • Assessments are used effectively for the purpose
    of improving teaching and learning in the
    classroom as well as helping with the utilization
    and impact of accountability data and information
    by school, district, and community.

3
Data Connections
  • Using Assessments to Improve Teaching and
    Learning

4
The Test Score Utilization module takes educators
through six lessons to enhance their
understanding of using test scores.
5
Determine Your Purposes
  • Retrospective to look at how prior students
    performed
  • Prospective to plan for incoming students based
    on prior performance.

6
Develop a Question List
  • Work to develop a list of essential questions
    regarding the data results, that when answered,
    would impact teaching and learning.
  • What factors contributed to the fact that Teacher
    As scores were consistently higher than that of
    Teacher Bs scores when their classroom makeup
    was so similar?
  • How could students be more effectively grouped
    for instruction?

7
Organize the Data
  • Work focuses on pulling together the information
    to help answer the questions.
  • Data will be in various places.

8
Develop Action Steps
  • Examples
  • Staff agreed to focus their efforts toward
    reading curriculum and instruction.
  • Staff developed and piloted culturally-relevant
    curriculum units.
  • Staff begin working on curriculum alignment.

9
The Curriculum Alignment module provides three
lessons for educators to understand how to align
their curriculum with content standards.
10
Determine Content Standards
  • Staff engaged in vertical and horizontal
    alignment of the curriculum to determine the WHAT
    to be taught and the WHEN it should be taught
  • Staff unpacked the standards to clarify the
    content, skills, and depth of knowledge at each
    grade level.

11
Organize Standards into Teachable Units
  • To determine which standards fit together to
    inform instructional units.
  • Project-based learning units of instruction would
    require research using media center and
    internet resources (English), development and
    measurement of a mouse trap (math), and
    multi-media marketing presentation (Language
    presentation and viewing).

12
The Classroom Assessment module takes educators
through four lessons to ensure that classroom
assessments are aligned with the state tests.
13
Define knowledge and skills to be assessed
  • Staff spend time looking at the language of the
    Content Standards as well as the language and
    requirements of performance descriptors
    (achievement standards).

14
Develop Test Items
  • Teachers analyze the match between the test items
    they have developed and the standards they have
    taught.

15
The Test-Taking Strategies module provides
information on four strategies to enhance
educators to work with their students prior to
the tests.
16
Examine Test Blueprints
  • Teachers receive laminated copies of the test
    blueprints so that they can keep track of when
    and where they addressed a standard throughout
    the year along with variations of presentation of
    item with students.

17
Use Practice Test
  • Staff are beginning to use an on-line practice
    test using juried test items written in the state
    selected standardized test format.
  • Allows access to data for clarifying
    misconceptions.
  • Students can practice using the information and
    know what the question is asking in terms of the
    thinking/processing skills.

18
Results
  • Overall, 70 of mathematics and science scores
    indicated improvement 81 of the science scores
    and 62 of the mathematics scores.

19
Results
  • Student achievement scores for the most part were
    at or above the 70 required for passing. Of the
    14 scores that had not reached the required 70
    percent for passing, 10 have risen since Spring
    2000.

20
Results
  • Schools with external facilitator obtained larger
    average Language, Mathematics, and Reading NCE
    gains than did the schools without an external
    facilitator.

21
Data Connections
  • Data Connections Using Assessment to Improve
    Teaching and Learning is available from AEL
    (www.ael.org) or Scarecrow Education
    (www.scarecroweducation.com)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com