Title: FY05 Chancellor's Budget Presentation
1THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM
FY 2005 Operating Budget August 2004 Presented
to the Board of Regents
2Total Budgeted Expenditures
- Budgeted Expenditures
- FY 2005 8.5 billion
- 683 million more than FY 04
- 8.7 more than FY 04
3Fall Enrollment
4Total Research Expenditures
5Hospitals, Clinics and Professional Fee Revenue
6Hospital Patient Days
7Unsponsored Charity Care
8PUF Distribution to the AUF
9Annual CIP Total Project Cost
10Total Budgeted Expenditures
11Where the Money Comes FromFiscal Year 2005
8.5 Billion
12Budgeted Revenues AcademicAll Funds (in
millions)
13Budgeted Revenues HealthAll Funds (in millions)
14Where The Money GoesFiscal Year 2005 By
Expenditure Type
8.5 Billion
15Where the Money GoesFiscal Year 2005 By Function
8.5 Billion
16Use of Flexible Tuition Revenue Increase Fiscal
Year 2005
117 Million Increase
17Budgeted Expenditure Increases-Fiscal Year 2005
over Fiscal Year 2004
18Budgeted Expenditures AcademicAll Funds (in
millions)
19Budgeted Expenditures HealthAll Funds (in
millions)
20The University of Texas System Administration
21What is the Function of System Administration?
- Special fiduciary responsibility for PUF other
endowments and management of university lands - Carry out Board policies
- Collaborate with Board on strategic planning
- Target new opportunities
- Serve as consultants to our components
- Provide wide range of centralized, cost-effective
and value-added services - Accountability and performance benchmarking
22Value-Added Services
23Value-Added Services (continued)
24System AdministrationBudget Highlights
- 635.2 FTEs in FY 2005 for System Administration
- Of that total, 413.9 FTEs are in self-supporting
departments that charge fees for support such as
Office of Facilities Planning and Construction,
Employee Group Insurance, Workers Compensation
Insurance, and grant funded activities - Remaining 221.3 FTEs make up General
Administration and are funded directly from
State Appropriations (either General Revenue or
Available University Fund) - 27.7 FTEs below HB 1 limitation
25General AdministrationBudget Highlights
- FY 2005 General Administration budget remains
relatively flat compared to FY 2004 down
177,000 - Moved Office of Technology and Information
Services to self-supporting service department - Savings have been reinvested in new and ongoing
initiatives in Institutional Studies, External
Relations and new Office on Policy
Administration. - Flexible hiring freeze implemented in November
2002 still in effect and ongoing reviews of
staffing efficiencies continue
26Budgeted FTEs -- 2000-2005
27System Administration Budgeted Actual
Expenditures 2000-2005
28Budgeted Expenditures Comparison
General Administration Budgeted Expenditures
Compared to System-wide Budgeted Expenditures
29Administrative Cost MeasuresHow Do Systems
Compare?
- One measure of administrative cost is
Institutional Support expenses (System-wide) as a
percent of total operating expenses - Institutional Support expenses are those for
- Central executive activities concerned with long
range planning - Legal Services
- Information Resources
- Human Resources
- Fiscal Operations
- Safety
- Security
- Space Management
- Governing Board
30Administrative Cost MeasuresHow Do Systems
Compare?
Campus and System Totals
31System Administration Budget Fiscal Year 2005
32- Library, Equipment, Repair and Rehabilitation
33Library, Equipment, Repair, Rehabilitation
Fiscal Year 2005
34Library, Equipment, Repair, Rehabilitation
Fiscal Year 2005
35Library, Equipment, Repair, Rehabilitation
Fiscal Year 2005
36THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM