European Periodic Reporting Dr. Mechtild R - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

European Periodic Reporting Dr. Mechtild R

Description:

2002: 30th anniversary and strategic goals. Strategic orientations 1992. Promote completion of the identification of the World Heritage; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:111
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: whc
Learn more at: https://whc.unesco.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: European Periodic Reporting Dr. Mechtild R


1
European Periodic ReportingDr. Mechtild
Rössler(UNESCO World Heritage Centre,
Paris)World Heritage Site Managers Meeting on
Periodic ReportingBrühl, Germany, 9 10 July
2003
2
World Heritage Convention
  • 1972 adoption
  • 1992 strategic orientations
  • 1998 Periodic Reporting
  • 2002 30th anniversary and strategic goals

3
Strategic orientations 1992
  1. Promote completion of the identification of the
    World Heritage
  2. Ensure the continued representativity and
    credibility of the World Heritage List
  3. Promote the adequate protection and management of
    the World Heritage sites
  4. Pursue more systematic monitoring of World
    Heritage sites
  5. Increase public awareness, involvement and
    support

4

5
World Heritage in Danger
  • ALBANIA, Butrint
  • Date of Inscription 6/12/1997,
  • Naples, 21st Session, of the Committee
  • AZERBAIJAN, Walled city of Baku
  • Date of Inscription 4/07/2003
  • Paris, 27th session of the Committee
  • UNITED STATES, Everglades National Park
  • Date of Inscription 11/12/1993
  • Cartagena, 17th Session of the Committee
  • REMOVAL 2003
  • BULGARIA, Srebarna Nature Reserve
  • Date of Inscription 14/12/1992
  • Santa Fe, 16th Session of the Committee
  • UNITED STATES, Yellowstone
  • Date of Inscription 9/12/1995

6
Whats Periodic Reporting
According to article 29 of the Convention
  • The States Parties shall submit periodic reports
    every six years on the provisions taken for
  • the application of the Convention and
  • the state of conservation of the properties
    inscribed in the List in their territories
  • The purpose is to
  • provide an assessment of the application of the
    Convention and the maintenance of the values of
    the properties inscribed
  • give updated information on the state of
    conservation of these properties
  • provide a mechanism for regional cooperation.

7
The benefit of the Regional Periodic Exercise
  • Identify pressing conservation and management
    needs
  • Elaborate national and sub-regional strategies
    for addressing these needs
  • Strengthen partnership between States Parties,
    specialized agencies, donors, stakeholders for
    implementing the strategies
  • Increase national capacity for the conservation
    of World Heritage properties
  • Protect and manage the World Heritage values

8
Periodic Reporting by regions
  • 2000 Arab States
  • 2001/02 Africa
  • 2003 Asia and the Pacific
  • 2004 Latin America and the Caribbean
  • 2005/2006 Europe and North America

9
Number of States per Region
10
Sites per region
11
Periodic Reporting
  • Europe and North America
  • (currently 376 World Heritage sites, 50 States
    Parties)
  • 42 States Parties with sites inscribed
    until 1998
  • natural sites 38
  • mixed sites 7
  • cultural sites 252
  • Total 297 sites until 1998

12
Periodic Reports in Europe and North America
  • Periodic Reports for Europe and North America
    will be examined by the World Heritage Committee
    in 2005 and 2006

Year Section I Section II
2005 Europe North America North America
2006 --- Europe
13
Section 1
  • Section 1 (State Party information) refers to
    the legislative and administrative provisions and
    action taken by the State Party to implement the
    Convention
  • Introduction
  • Identification of cultural and natural heritage
    properties
  • Protection, conservation and presentation of the
    cultural and natural heritage
  • International co-operation and fund raising
  • Education, information and awareness building
  • Conclusions and recommended action

14
Section 2
  • State of conservation of specific World Heritage
    properties
  • Introduction
  • Statement of significance
  • Statement of authenticity/integrity
  • Management
  • Factors affecting the property
  • Monitoring
  • Conclusions and recommended action

15
(No Transcript)
16
Lessons learnt from other regions
  • Format-related problems
  • Site specific problems
  • Administrative problems
  • Process-related problems

17
Format-related problems
  • - too complicated, extensive, duplications
  • Size of the reports
  • - Questionnaire (form) developed (Arab States,
    Africa, Asia, and Latin America to facilitate the
    completion of format), different questionnaires
    used reports too large
  • - Summaries and synthesis produced for the
    Committee

18
Site specific problems
  • - incomplete nomination files
  • No maps (no core/buffer zones/boundaries)
  • Values of the site definition of criteria,
    limited knowledge in State Parties of WH values
  • Legal and management framework
  • No management plans

19
Maps and buffer zones
20
Administrative problems
  • - Institutional continuity
  • Financial resources
  • Competence and responsibility of administrative
    levels
  • Lack of coordination
  • Lack of knowledge of Convention and its
    application and of interest
  • Lack of linguistic competences to complete
    reports
  • Communication channels

21
Process related problems
  • Timely identification of national focal points
  • Timely reaction to information requests
  • late submission of reports and translation
    problems
  • Lack of understanding of submission process
    (roles of State Party, Advisory Bodies,
    Secretariat, Committee)
  • Involvement of National Commissions and Permanent
    Delegations to UNESCO/Observer Missions

22
Solutions?
  • - Identify problems at an early stage
  • Organize training sessions and international
    assistance
  • proactive approach from UNESCO-WHC and active
    national institutions working with UNESCO
  • Good coordination on State Parties level
  • Development of web-page, which will allow an
    interactive exchange of information
  • Participation in international tools for data
    collection

23
Site managers Your input is required on SECTION
II!!
24
Strategy and timetable overview
SECTION I SECTION II
PHASE I (2002/03) data collection national coordinators prepare web-site and meeting schedule national coordinators to establish list of site managers and contact them
PHASE II (2003) training of national focal points through web-site and meetings Site managers to start process
25

PHASE III 2004 review of draft reports for Section I Organization of sub-regional meetings in 2004/05
PHASE IV Completion of Section I (December 2004) 2005 finalization and review of all reports for Section II
PHASE V Committee in June 2005 Completion of Section II (December 2005)
PHASE VI Committee in June 2006
26
Phases I and II (2003)
  • PHASE I (2002/03)
  • data collection national focal points
  • prepare web-site and meeting schedule
  • Focal points to establish list of site managers
    and contact them
  • PHASE II (2003)
  • Training of national focal points through
    web-site and national/sub-regional meetings
  • Site managers to start process

27
Website
  • Information on
  • background documents the Format for Periodic
    Reporting and the Operational Guidelines,
  • the questionnaires used by other regions,
  • the timetable of the reporting exercise,
  • models for filling in Sections I and II of the
    Periodic Report,
  • A tool for the electronic completion of the
    report is under development.
  • http//whc.unesco.org/reporting/europe

28
Training meetings
  • National meetings took place in the UK and Italy,
    in addition to this meeting in Germany others are
    being prepared in France and Spain,
  • Sub-regional meetings are foreseen in Russia and
    Hungary
  • Other meetings will be organised for South
    Western Europe and South Eastern Europe

29
(No Transcript)
30
The Periodic Reporting process will permit States
Parties to
  • Monitor changes of World Heritage Properties in
    their territories,
  • Examine conservation challenges
  • Draw conclusions for national strategies to
    enhance World Heritage conservation
  • Strengthen the capacity of heritage conservation
    authorities

31
This process will permit the World Heritage
Committee to
  • Examine changes to World Heritage values on a
    global scale
  • Respond to the needs of State Parties and
    formulate recommendations
  • Draw conclusions for its own policy and decision
    making as well as international assistance
  • Elaborate with States Parties and advisory bodies
    capacity building programmes at the regional,
    sub-regional and national levels

32
THANK YOU!
  • For all your efforts.
  • As your exercise will pave the way for the new
    periodic reporting cycle starting in 2007 for all
    other regions of the world.
  • To preserve the outstanding universal values of
    the World Heritage sites on earth..
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com