Title: District Response Plan Training January 24, 2002
1(No Transcript)
2ABSTRACT
The anthrax exposures via a letter to Capitol
Hill through the Brentwood Postal Facility in
Washington DC, necessitated the rapid deployment
of a mass treatment for postal workers and
others in the Washington metropolitan area.
Modification to the National Pharmaceutical
Stockpile (NPS) Use Plan facilitated this
medication distribution to over 15,000 persons
within a two week period. Incident management
was through the District of Columbia Department
of Health using an incident command
structure. Challenges encountered were seen in
four main areas (1) event management, (2)
dispensing of medications, (3) resources and (4)
communications. Each area presented overlapping
and confounding issues because of the uniqueness
of the Washington Capital Region.
3Overview of Presentation
- Discuss the Overall District Response Methodology
- Discuss how the District Responded to the Anthrax
Attacks (October 2001 Present) - Lessons Learned
- Next steps
4The Unique Challenges of District Government
Since we function as a city, County and State
with daily interactions with our citizens,
federal partners, neighboring states and
regional entities, our plans must include actions
and responsibilities for all parties involved.
5September 11, 2001 and the Anthrax Attacks
6INTRODUCTION
- Letter containing anthrax spores arrives on
Capitol Hill via the Brentwood Postal Facility on
October 15, 2001 - Initial suspected inhalation anthrax case
admitted to a Virginia Hospital on October 19,
2001. Initial death reported on October 21, 2001 - Mass prophylaxis begun on October 21, 2001
- Closure of Brentwood Postal Facility on October
21, 2001 - Prophylactic antibiotics recommended by the DC
DOH for all employees, contractors and visitors
to non-public areas of Brentwood - 5 confirmed cases from regional postal facilities
7DC Area Anthrax Locations
8The New District Response Plan
- Based on Incident Command System (ICS)
- Interoperability with Federal Response Plan (FRP)
- 15 Support Functions
- 10 Annexes (including Terrorism Annex)
- Coordinated delivery of assistance and resources
- Collaborated on by support and lead agencies and
private industry - Can be found online _at_ http//dcema.dc.gov
- Approved April 4, 2002
- Currently going 1st comprehensive update
9DRP Purpose and Highlights
- Strategic in Nature not tactical
- Outlines general roles and responsibilities
- Highlights Command and Control Structure (ICS and
Unified Command) - All-Hazards Approach
- Starting point for more-specific departmental
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
10What Is the District Response Plan (DRP)?
A framework that ensures that the District is
prepared to respond to the consequences of all
hazards.
- What Does the DRP Do?
- Describes the roles and responsibilities of
District agencies for all hazards as well as the
agencies relationships with federal and
volunteer agencies that may support them should
the situation warrant assistance. - Unifies the efforts of organizations for a
comprehensive approach to responding to a public
emergency.
11What Does the DRP Do? cont
- Provides the mechanism for coordinated delivery
of District assistance and resources to District
citizens in a public emergency. - Describes how federal assistance and resources
will be coordinated with District resources in
response to a public emergency. - The DRP is structured after the Federal Response
Plan (FRP) to provide interoperability with
federal response agencies.
12What Are the General Concepts of Operation under
the DRP?
- The DRP adopts the principles of an existing
national incident management system and the
incident command system (ICS). - The structure employs the principles of unified
command where organizations operate in the
Emergency Operations Center (EOC) with parallel
and overlapping authorities. - In the event a Presidential disaster declaration
is issued, the DRP works in concert with the
Federal Response Plan (FRP).
13What Are the 15 DRP ESFs?
14What is the Activation Process?
15PROPHYLAXIS DESIGN
- At risk population defined
- Time of exposure
- Work area
- Period of exposure
- Incident Command Structure utilized
- Single site selection
- Recently-closed DC General Hospital chosen to
support the mission - Prophylaxis choice
- The National Pharmaceutical Stockpile
- Multi-dose regimen
- Changing expert guidelines
16RESULTS
- Patient visits
- 17,759 patients seen at distribution center over
a 2 week period (October 21- November 2, 2001) - Medications distributed
- 497,880 capsules of doxycycline
- 160,160 tablets of ciprofloxacin
- Regimens used
- Initial 10 day supply
- 50 day supply
- 60 day supply
- DOH staff involved
- 300 people
17Lessons LearnedEVENT MANAGEMENT
- Invoke event management structure early
- Assume worst case. Scale down as required
- Define lead agency clearly
- Region in which event occurs should be lead
- Define key responsibilities
- Predefine if possible
- Coordinate cross- jurisdictional issues
- Fed. Government/CDC/Medical community/DC
Government agencies/US Postal Service/Regional
DOHs - Record events for post event analysis
18Lessons Learned MEDICATION DISTRIBUTION
- Distribution site
- Identify and design layout in advance
- Pre-develop distribution protocols, especially
patient education materials - Privacy and confidentiality
- ID tracking of persons and medication doses (e.g.
barcodes) - Employees reluctant to disclose medical
information - Clinical evaluations often required in
dispensing area - Security
19PATIENT FLOW10-DAY
Pharmacy
Patient Ed
Patient Ed
Patient Departure
Patient Ed
Sick Room
Nursing Triage
Dispensing POD II
Patient Depart
Nurse Triage
POD I
POD II
20PATIENT FLOW 50/60 DAY
(Patient Materials Provided)
(Patient History Collected)
Nurse Triage
Patient Departure
Patient Arrival
Buses
Patient Ed
Dispensing
21Lessons LearnedRESOURCES
- Staff
- Determine required staff categories in advance
- Train for various scenarios and desired skill
sets - Transportation
- Dedicated transport vehicle for each site
- Telecommunications
- Intersite communications required
- Equip vital staff with two way pagers
22Lessons LearnedCOMMUNICATIONS
- Types of information
- Public (N.B. diversity)
- Healthcare providers
- Consequence management
- Internal
- Timeline for information
- Expedite approval process for release
- Call center necessary
- Dissemination of information
- Information specialist
- Use all available media
- Communicate regionally
23Public Health in a Changed WorldAnthrax in
Washington DC
24 THE CHALLENGE
- October 15, 2001 anthrax laced letter arrives
in Senate Office - Oct. 18, 2001 press conference held in
Brentwood postal facility - Oct. 19, 2001 first patient presents with
occupational inhalation anthrax - Oct. 21, 2001 first postal worker dies.
Brentwood closed
25THE RESPONSE
- Mass prophylaxis begun within 7 hours of
positive confirmation - 17,759 patients seen at DC site over 2 weeks
- 160,160 tabs Ciprofloxacin, 497,880 caps
doxycycline - Public Health corps medical/pharmacists deployed
within 4 hrs. - CDC team on site (gt100 members)
- Red Cross/Kaiser/local MD volunteers
26INCIDENT MANAGEMENT LESSONS
- Incident Command Structure
- Define lead agency, responsibilities
- Record events, costs
- Logistics
- Medicine distribution
- Site
- Privacy/confidentiality
- Clinical evaluations, mental health
- Security
- Resources
- Staff
- Transportation
- Telecommunications
27UNIVERSAL LESSONS
- Public Health is first responder in any terrorist
event - Only mechanisms that have been practiced can be
relied on to work - Always tell the truth, even when youre not sure
what it is - Providers are vital for ongoing surveillance
- Information sharing in real-time is more
difficult than you think
28LESSONS FROM ANTHRAX
- Relationships are key
- Training is vital
- Communications are everything
29RELATIONSHIPS
- Only those already formed can be relied on
- Know the key players and their contact numbers
- Friends are better than plans
- Get to know the Feds!
30TRAINING
- Practice, Practice, Practice
- The hardest to reach and teach are the physicians
- The last to follow recommendations are the
physicians
31COMMUNICATIONS
- Public remember diversity
- Clear calm direct
- Translators
- Valid credible spokesperson
- Providers
- Need real-time information
- Need hotline advice
- Need frequent updates and protocols
- Partners
- Local
- Regional
32CONCLUSION
- Hospitals require secure information system.
Develop hotline for healthcare providers - Produce protocols and action plan for various
scenarios - Coordinate levels of alertness with national
color coding and with other agencies - Staff training for all levels
- Communicate clearly at community level to
reassure and assure response. Credible
spokesperson
33CONCLUSION
- We have the ability and must develop the capacity
to be ready - We must provide trust, credibility, and honesty
- Plan Practice Review Plan - Practice
34Implementation of New HSAS System
Next Steps Implementing it at the local level
for DC Government, Citizens and Businesses
The Districts recommended actions for Residents
and businesses can be found at http//dcema.dc.go
v/info/threat.shtm
35For More Information please contact
The District of Columbia Emergency Management
Agency Steven Charvat, CEM 2000 14th Street,
NW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20009 USA Phone
(202) 727-6161 FAX (202) 673-2290 Email
steven.charvat_at_dc.gov www http//dcema.dc.gov