BEYOND REPAIR: ErrorFree Long Form Assembly - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

BEYOND REPAIR: ErrorFree Long Form Assembly

Description:

Stanford University School of Medicine. The Referee Grid ... in commencement of long ... approval or requested revision (typically within 7 10 days) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: cspe3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BEYOND REPAIR: ErrorFree Long Form Assembly


1
BEYOND REPAIR Error-Free Long FormAssembly
  • Office of the Senior Associate Dean for Academic
    Affairs
  • Stanford University School of Medicine

2
The Referee Grid
3
Presentation Overview
  • Referee Grid Basics When, What, Why
  • Critical Grid Components
  • Common Errors
  • Submission sequence

4
When do I submit a referee grid?
  • Initiation of Search
  • Search Report and Draft Offer Letter
  • Referee Grid
  • Letter Submission
  • Draft Long Form
  • Revised Long Form
  • Final Long Form

5
What is a Referee Grid?
  • Formatted list of names of potential authors of
    letters of evaluation
  • Includes information on relationships and stature
    of potential referees
  • Screening tool to prevent errors

6
Whats on the Grid?
  • Names of proposed referees external, internal,
    and trainees
  • Names of proposed peers for comparison (if
    required by the specific long form)
  • Scientific and academic distinctions
  • Rank, institution, and relationship to candidate

7
(picture of grid sample here screenshot)
8
Where do I find the form?
  • http//www.med.stanford.edu/academicaffairs/handbo
    ok/forms/Referee_Grid.doc

9
Why do we require a grid?
Consistency of presentation. . .
  • Saves formatting time
  • Saves screening time
  • Reduces errors

10
Components External Referees
  • Name and degree
  • Current institution and academic rank
  • Relationship to candidate
  • Scientific and academic distinctions
  • Note Include mix of relationships and
    institutions, ranks at or above that proposed for
    the candidate

11
Components Internal Referees
  • Name and Degree
  • Rank (at or above rank proposed for candidate)
  • Department
  • Caution Do NOT select the department chair or
    members of the evaluation committee or search
    committee.

12
Components Trainees
  • Name and Degree
  • Current Status (e.g., Postdoctoral Fellow or
    Private Practice)
  • Address
  • Note Include mix of past, recent, and current
    trainees. Perform random selection when
    possible.

13
Components Named Peers
  • Only required in certain cases such as
    promotion to Associate Professor with tenure
  • Make your own simple table on the referee grid
  • Name and degree
  • Current academic rank and institution
  • Year and institution of highest degree
  • NOTE Do your best to acquire this information
    from public sources, such as the internet. Do
    NOT contact the named peers office or
    institution.

14
When are named peers required?
  • Tenure line actions conferring tenure
  • Research line new appointments to Associate or
    Full Professor
  • Research line actions for continuing term
  • Teaching line actions for continuing term

How many named peers? 5
15
Common Errors (normally detected with initial
submission of grid)
  • External or internal referees with inappropriate
    academic rank, without explanation
  • Inappropriate mix of external referee
    relationships to candidate
  • Insufficient numbers of referees or peers
  • When required, named peers and background
    information not supplied

16
Error Consequences (early detection)
  • Return of grid for revision
  • Delay in commencement of long form assembly

17
Common Errors (detected after draft long form
submitted)
  • Relationships not properly stated on grid
  • Search committee or evaluation committee members
    included as internal referees
  • Referees not well positioned to evaluate
    candidate
  • When required, named peer comparison group not
    properly selected too junior, too senior, or in
    wrong field

18
Error Consequences (late detection)
  • Case-specific
  • Explanation of irregularities in process
  • Possible additional solicitation of letters

19
Grid Submission Sequence
  • Candidate may submit list of suggested referees
    and trainees.
  • At Chairs discretion, modify lists as
    appropriate (add, delete, or change members) and
    select named peers if applicable. The candidate
    should NOT know the final lists of referees,
    trainees or peers.
  • Submit Grid and CV electronically via email to
    Office of Academic Affairs.

20
Where do I submit a referee grid?
  • Assistant Professor appointments and
    reappointments Rebecca Robinson,
    rrobinso_at_stanford.edu, 4-9696
  • Associate Professor and Professor appointments,
    reappointments, and promotions, including
    promotions to Associate Professor Craig
    Spencer, cspence_at_stanford.edu, 8-4577

21
What happens next?
  • Review of grid in Office of Academic Affairs
  • Notification of approval or requested revision
    (typically within 7 10 days)
  • Clearance to begin long form assembly

22
The Referee Grid - End
  • Referee Grid Basics
  • Critical Grid Components
  • Common Errors
  • Submission sequence
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com