SIGRAV Graduate School in Contemporary - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

SIGRAV Graduate School in Contemporary

Description:

Elvis, Risaliti & Zamorani (2002): Barger et al. (2001) Gilli, Salviati & Hasinger (2002) ... a few light days. 5 106 to. 5 108. Reverberation Mapping. Three ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:62
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: PJC1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: SIGRAV Graduate School in Contemporary


1
Laura Ferrarese Rutgers University lff_at_physics.rut
gers.edu Observational Evidence For Supermassive
Black Holes. Lecture 1 Motivation
  • SIGRAV Graduate School in Contemporary
  • Relativity and Gravitational Physics

2
Lectures Outline
  • Lecture 1 Introduction and Motivation
  • Lecture 2 Stellar Dynamics
  • Lecture 3 Gas Dynamics
  • Lecture 4 AGNs and Reverberation Mapping
  • Lecture 5 Scaling Relations
  • Lecture 6 What the Future Might Bring
  • ALL LECTURES ARE ON-LINE
  • http//www.physics.rutgers.edu/lff/Como
  • Username como
  • Password sigrav
  • http//dipastro.pd.astro.it/bertola/astrofisica.ht
    ml

3
Lecture 1 Outline
  • Motivation Why Do We Think Supermassive Black
    Holes Exist, and Where Should We Look if We
    Wanted to Find One?
  • The Mass Density in the Supermassive Black Holes
    Powering Quasar Activity
  • The Mass Density in the Supermassive Black Holes
    Powering Local AGNs
  • Supermassive Black Hole Detections

4
Historical Overview
  • Although unrealized at the time, the first hint
    of the existence of supermassive black holes was
    unveiled with
  • Karl Janskys 1932 discovery of radio emission
    from the Galactic center.
  • Carl Seyferts 1943 discovery of the peculiar
    spiral galaxies which today carry his name.
  • By the 1960, several hundred radio sources had
    been
  • discovered, and astronomers were struggling to
    find
  • optical counterparts.
  • In 1960, Allan Sandage identified 3C48 with a
    single blue
  • point of light. In the two years after Sandages
    discovery of
  • the optical counterpart to 3C48, a half dozen
    such objects
  • were discovered to distinguish them from radio
    galaxies,
  • for which the optical emission is clearly
    resolved, objects
  • like 3C48 were named quasi stellar radio objects
    or quasars.

Karl Jansky
3C 48
5
Historical Overview
Ground based optical images of 3C273
Optical jet
Hubble Space Telescope images of 3C273, revealing
the underlying galaxy
6
Quasars
  • The spectral energy distribution of quasars (and
    AGNs in general) is markedly non-stellar.

SED for 3C273 green contribution from the
outer jet blue contribution from the host
galaxy. http//obswww.unige.ch/3c273/
7
Quasars
  • The night after observing the optical counterpart
    to 3C48, Sandage took a spectrum, which he
    described as the weirdest spectrum I had ever
    seen. The spectrum had several emission lines,
    but none seemed to correspond to known elements.
  • The impasse was broken by Maarten Schmidt in
    1963.
  • Schmidt realized that the emission lines in the
    spectrum
  • of 3C273, were the very familiar hydrogen Balmer
    lines,
  • but redshifted by v/c 0.158. It was soon
    realized that
  • all quasar spectra could be interpreted this
    way.
  • Although controversial for a long time, it is now
    recognized
  • that quasar redshifts are cosmological.

8
Quasars
  • 3C273, and all quasars, show flux variability on
    timescales of hours to months (depending on the
    frequency)

3C273 http//obswww.unige.ch/3c273/
9
Quasars
  • ENERGY OUTPUT At cosmological distances, quasars
    must be hundreds to many tens of thousand times
    more luminous than an L galaxy.
  • In general, AGNs bolometric luminosity are of
    order 1044-1048 erg s-1
  • In the Eddington approximation, this implies
    masses LE 4? GMBH mp/?T and assuming a typical
    quasar lifetime of order 107 yr ? MBH gt 106 M?
  • SIZE The time variability sets very tight limits
    on the size of the emitting region, which must be
    smaller than the distance light can travel in
    that time
  • Even if the brightness changes at every point
    simultaneously, the change happening at point A
    would reach us sooner than the change from point
    B. It will take the time for light to travel from
    point B to point A for an observer to perceive
    the full change.
  • This implies that the emitting region is less
    than a few light weeks or days across.
  • Combined with the constraints on the mass, the
    implied central densities are of order 1015 M?pc-3

Brightness
Time
10
Quasars
  • COHERENCE jet stability and collimation over
    hundred of kiloparsecs in some objects imply a
    stable energy source.

1Mpc
11
AGNs
  • RELATIVISTIC MOTIONS one of the greatest
    surprises provided by very-long baseline
    interferometry (VLBI) observations was the fact
    that some AGNs exhibit motion along their jets
    with speeds which appear to be several times
    faster than light.

5000 light years
Sequence of HST images showing blobs in the M87
jet apparently moving at six times the speed of
light. The slanting lines track the moving
features.
12
  • Energetics, sizes, densities, coherence, and the
    presence of relativistic motions imply that the
    power supply is gravitational central engines
    are relativistic, massive, compact and good
    gyroscopes.
  • A massive black hole is the inevitable end result
    of nuclear runaway

From Rees 1984, ARAA 22, 471
13
The Relativistic Region
  • Evidence for a Strong Field Regime 6.4 keV Fe K?
    emission is the most compelling case of the
    existence of an accretion disk at 3-10Rs from a
    central BH (Fabian et al. 1989, 1995 Nandra et
    al. 1997, Iwasawa et al. 1999). Line widths reach
    105 km s-1
  • Potential way to constrain
  • spin of the BH
  • accretion rate
  • central mass
  • (Fabian et al. 1989, Martocchia et al. 2000)

14
Where to Look Punchline
  • Quasars were much more common in the past the
    quasar era occurred when the Universe was only
    10-20 of its present age.
  • Simple arguments indicate that the cumulative
    mass density in supermassive black holes powering
    quasar activity is of order
  • ?BH(QSO) 3 - 4 ?105 M? Mpc-3
  • However, the mass density in supermassive black
    holes at the centers of local AGNs is a full two
    order of magnitudes lower!
  • Where have the quasars gone?
  • The bulk of the mass connected with the accretion
    in high redshift QSOs does not reside in local
    AGNs.
  • ? Remnants of past activity must be present in a
    large number of quiescent galaxies.

15
Where to Look
  • Our journey into SBH demographics stars from
    quasars lets try to follow their evolution from
    the study of the luminosity function (number of
    quasars per unit comoving volume).
  • LOW REDSHIFTS (z lt 2.3) (Boyle et al. 2000,
    MNRAS, 317, 1014)
  • The 2-degree field QSO Redshift survey includes
    redshifts for gt 25000 18.25ltBlt20.85 QSOs in two
    75 5 declination strips in the South Galactic
    Pole and in an equatorial region at the North
    Galactic cap. Data were collected using the AAT
    Two-Degree Field (2dF) multi-object
    spectrographic system, which allows up to 400
    spectra to be obtained at once.
  • http//www.aao.gov.au/2df/
  • http//www.2dfquasar.org/
  • HIGH REDSHIFTS (z gt 3.5) (Fan et al. 2001, AJ,
    121, 54)
  • The Sloan Digital Sky Survey First Data Release
    includes photometric data based on five-band
    imaging observations of 2099 square degrees of
    sky. Based on these photometric data, spectra
    were obtained for 150,000 galaxies and quasars.
    The survey will ultimately cover 1/4 of the sky,
    and is currently 65 complete for imaging, and
    44 complete for spectroscopy.
  • http//www.sdss.org/

16
The 2dF Quasar Survey
Completeness
QSO distribution
17
The 2dF Quasar Survey
  • The quasar optical luminosity function (LF) for
    ten separate data subsets divided by redshift.
    Over the redshift range 0.35 lt z lt 2.3 the LF is
    approximated by a pure luminosity evolution, i.e.
    the form of the LF does not vary with redshift,
    but is simply shifted to higher luminosity. Note
    that the shape and evolution at low redshifts (z
    lt 0.5) and high luminosities are not currently
    well sampled by the survey.

18
THe SDSS Quasar Survey
  • The LF is derived from 39 luminous QSOs over the
    range 3.6ltzlt5.0, and -27.5ltM1450lt-25.5. The
    luminous quasar density decreases by a factor of
    6 from z 3.5 to z 5.0. The luminosity
    function at the bright end is significantly
    flatter than the bright end luminosity function
    found at zlt3, suggesting that the quasar
    evolution from z2 to z5 cannot be described as
    pure luminosity evolution (Fan et al. 2001, AJ,
    121, 54).
  • The survey has also detected 4 quasars at
    redshift gt 6, including the current record holder
    at z6.48 (Fan et al. astro-ph/0301135)

19
SBHs in High Redshift Quasars
Fan et al. 2001, Boyle et al. 2000
  • QSO Mass Function (0.3 lt z lt 5)
  • (Soltan 1982, MNRAS, 200, 115 Chokshi Turner
    1992, Small Blandford 1992, Salucci et al.
    1998)
  • 1) Luminosity Function
  • 2) Integrated comoving energy density
  • 3) Integrated comoving mass density

20
SBHs in High Redshift Quasars
Ferrarese 2002 (astroph/0203047)
  • A note of caution
  • The magnitude limits of the 2dF and SDSS samples
    correspond to Eddington limits on the masses of
    4.5?107 M? and 7.3?108 M? respectively.
  • The quasar LF has no coverage in the 2.3 lt z lt
    3.0 redshift range.
  • See also Yu Tremaine 2002 (MNRAS 335, 965)

21
SBHs in High Redshift Quasars
  • Accounting for the diffuse X-ray background
    requires most quasars to be hidden behind large
    amounts of dust and gas, significantly increasing
    the total quasar luminosity of the Universe
    (Maiolino Rieke 1995 Fabian Iwasawa 1999
    Mushotzky et al. 2000 Barger et al. 2001 Gilli,
    Salviati Hasinger 2001 Elvis, Risaliti
    Zamorani 2002 Hasinger 2002 Ghandi Fabian
    2002)
  • Fabian Iwasawa (1999)
  • Elvis, Risaliti Zamorani (2002)
  • Barger et al. (2001)
  • Gilli, Salviati Hasinger (2002)
  • Ghandi Fabian (2002)

Gilli, Salviati Hasinger 2002
22
SBHs in Local AGNs
  • Local AGN Mass Function (0 lt z lt 0.2)
  • (Padovani et al. 1990, ApJ, 353, 438)
  • Need a way to estimate MBH in a complete sample
    of galaxies
  • Assume that the BLR clouds are gravitationally
    bound
  • MBHv2r/G
  • with r size of the Broad Line Region measured
    from
  • ? Reverberation mapping (Blandford McKee,
    Peterson 2001)
  • Photoionization methods (Padovani et al.
  • 1990 Wandel Peterson Malkan 1998)

23
How to Do It
  • How can we constrain the masses of supermassive
    black holes?
  • naively, we might think that the presence of a
    SBH will create a cusp in the brightness profile
    of the host galaxy.
  • It does, but..

From Kormendy Richstone 1995, ARAA, 33, 581
24
How to Do It
Primary Methods
25
Detections of SBHs in the Local Universe
26
Detecting Supermassive Black Holes in Local
Galaxies
  • With the exception of the Iron K? observations,
    every other technique used to measure
    supermassive black holes masses probes regions
    well beyond the strong field regime.

In units of the Schwarzschild radius RS GM/c2
1.5 ? 1013 M8 cm .
27
Preview Scaling Relations
28
Suggested Readings
  • Iron Kapha Line Reynolds Nowak 2003,
    astro-ph/0212065
  • SBH Demographics Soltan 1982, MNRAS, 200, 115
  • Ferrarese 2002, in Current high-energy
    emission around black holes, Eds by C.-H. Lee
    and H.-Y. Chang. Singapore World Scientific
    Publishing, p.3, astro-ph/0203047
  • Yu Tremaine 2002, MNRAS, 335, 965
  • Quasar Luminosity Function Fan et al. 2001, AJ,
    121, 54
  • Boyle et al. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 1014
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com