Title: Geography matters: estimating the local impacts of national social policies
1Geography matters estimating the local impacts
of national social policies
Employment Research Institute, Napier
University Edinburgh, Friday 23 January 2004
- Dimitris Ballas
- Department of Geography, University of Sheffield
- http//www.sheffield.ac.uk/geography/
2Outline
- The need for regional and local socio-economic
impact assessment - What is microsimulation?
- Conceptual issues spatial vs. aspatial
microsimulation dynamic vs. static
microsimulation the current state of
geographical microsimulation - Geographical approaches to analysing survey data
3Outline (cont.)
- Adding geography to national survey data
- Estimating and updating small area statistics
- Simulating small area microdata validation and
policy relevance - Using spatial microsimulation for the evaluation
of national social policies - Concluding remarks
4Traditional approaches to socio-economic impact
assessment and policy analysis
- Regional Keynesian multiplier analysis
- Input-output models
- Regional econometric Models
- Socio-economic indexes
- Qualitative research methodologies
- Descriptive survey-based studies
- Microsimulation
5What is microsimulation?
- A technique aiming at building large scale data
sets - Modelling at the microscale
- A means of modelling real life events by
simulating the characteristics and actions of the
individual units that make up the system where
the events occur
6Microsimulation in Economics
- First conceptualised and developed by Orcutt
(1957) - Since then, very successful history
- Wide range of applications tax/benefit, budget
analysis, measurement of poverty, policy impact
assessment etc. - Microsimulation is an established method in
Economics
7Some examples of microsimulation applications in
Economics
- PENSIM. This was a microsimulation model for the
simulation of pensioners incomes up to the year
2030. Hancock et al. (1992) - Sutherland and Piachaud (The Economic Journal,
2001) developed and used a microsimulation
methodology for the assessment of British
government policies for the reduction of child
poverty in the period 1997-2001. Results suggest
that the number of children in poverty will be
reduced by approximately one-third in the short
term and that there is a trend towards further
reductions
8Doesnt geography matter? Why didnt economists
incorporate space into their models?
- Lack of good quality geographical data there
were very few sources of geographical
socio-economic data. Even today there are no
small area population microdata, which is the
standard datasets used by economic
microsimulation models - Computational intensity the incorporation of
geography into standard microsimulation models
increases significantly the computational demand - Concerns with simulation accuracy
- Belief that geography is not important
- Unfamiliarity with geographical data and methods
9Distribution of microsimulation academic studies
in the period 1967-2003 (source
http//www.sciencedirect.com/ Accessed 15
October 2003)
10Microsimulation in Geography and Regional Science
- First study by Hägerstrand (1967) spatial
diffusion of innovation - Foundations for spatial microsimulation of
populations laid by Wilson and Pownall (1976)
building small area microdata - Clarke et al. (1979 onwards) extended the
theoretical framework of Wilson and Pownall
11Spatial microsimulation procedures
- The construction of a micro-dataset from samples
and surveys - Static What-if simulations, in which the impacts
of alternative policy scenarios on the population
are estimated for instance if there had been no
poll tax in 1991 which communities would have
benefited most and which would have had to have
paid more tax in other forms? - Dynamic modelling, to update a basic
micro-dataset and future-oriented what-if
simulations for instance if the current
government had raised income taxes in 1997 what
would the redistributive effects have been
between different socio-economic groups and
between central cities and their suburbs by 2007?
12Static spatial microsimulation
- Reweighting probabilistic approaches, which
typically reweight an existing national microdata
set to fit a geographical area description on the
basis of random sampling and optimisation
techniques - Reweighting deterministic approaches, which
reweight a non geographical population microdata
set to fit small area descriptions, but without
the use of random sampling procedures - Synthetic probabilistic reconstruction models,
which involve the use of random sampling
13Reweighting approaches (1)
14Reweighting approaches (2)
15Probabilistic reconstruction approaches
- p(xi ,S,A,Q,EP,SEG)
- given a set of constraints or known
probabilities - p(xi ,S,A,EP)
- p(xi ,Q,S)
- p(xi ,SEG,EP)
16Static spatial microsimulation approaches -
Iterative Proportional Fitting (IPF)-based
microsimulation
- The IPF procedure can be seen at its simplest
form as - a method to adjust a two-dimensional matrix
iteratively until - the row sums and column sums equal some
predefined values -
- IPF can also be defined as a mathematical scaling
procedure, - which ensures that a two-dimensional table of
data is adjusted - so that its row and column totals agree with row
and column totals - from alternative sources
17Dynamic spatial microsimulation
- Probabilistic dynamic models, which use event
probabilities to project each individual in the
simulated database into the future (e.g. using
event conditional probabilities). - Implicitly dynamic models, which use independent
small area projections and then apply the static
simulation methodologies to create small area
microdata statically
18SimBritain main data sources Census data and the
BHPS
- 1991 Census of UK population
- 100 coverage
- fine geographical detail
- Small area data available only in tabular format
with limited variables to preserve
confidentiality - cross-sectional
- British Household Panel Survey
- sample size more than 5,000 households
- Annual surveys (waves) since 1991
- Coarse geography
- Household attrition
19SimBritain aims and objectives
- Reweight the first wave of the BHPS data to fit
small areas - Dynamically simulate this population for the
years 2001, 1991, 2011, 2021 (groundhog day
scenario) - What-if dynamic simulations
20SimBritain modelling approach
- Establish a set of constraints
- Choose a spatially defined source population
- Repeatedly sample from source
- Adjust weightings to match first constraint
- Adjust weightings to match second constraint
-
- Adjust weightings to match final constraint
- Go back to step 4 and repeat loop until results
converge - Save weightings which define membership of
SimBritain
21How do we make SimBritain dynamic?
- Original strategy model the ageing death and
creation of households (from the panel nature of
the BHPS) and the geographic movement of
households (using migration data from the Census
and other sources). This was abandoned when
migration data proved to be of insufficient
quality. - Intermediate strategy extrapolate constraint
values and re-populate each area anew at
the-yearly intervals using the original samples - Future strategy create synthetic household
histories from the panel data. Methods are also
being developed to allow for inflation of values
over time (e.g. income, pc ownership etc) and for
changing geographical composition (via projected
constraint values)
22CONSTRAINT TABLES
23SimBritain spatial distribution of poor
households, 1991
24SimBritain spatial distribution of poor
households, 2001
25SimBritain spatial distribution of poor
households, 2011
26SimBritain spatial distribution of poor
households, 2021
27SimBritain spatial distribution of retired
households, 1991
28SimBritain spatial distribution of retired
households, 2001
29SimBritain spatial distribution of retired
households, 2011
30SimBritain spatial distribution of retired
households, 2021
31How do we know it makes sense?
32How do we know it makes sense?
33Comparing Census data to projected data for 1991
(projection based on data from the Censuses of
1961, 1971 and 1981)
34(No Transcript)
35Policy relevance some results from SimYork
- Background Seebohm Rowntrees study of poverty
in York - Primary poverty, which meant that the total
family earnings are insufficient to obtain the
minimum necessaries for the maintenance of merely
physical efficiency (Rowntree, 2000 86) - Secondary poverty, which meant that the family
earnings would be sufficient for the maintenance
of merely physical efficiency were it not that
some portion of it is absorbed by other
expenditure, either useful or wasteful
(Rowntree, 2000 86-87)
36Defining and estimating poverty
The subsistence approach to the definition
of poverty is an absolute concept of poverty
it is dominated by the individuals requirements
for physiological efficiency. However, this is a
very limited conception of human needs,
especially when considering the roles men and
women play in society. People are not just
physical beings, they are social beings. They
have obligations as workers, parents, neighbours,
friends and citizens that they are expected to
meet and which they themselves want to meet.
(Gordon and Pantazis, 1997 9)
37SimBritain household classification
- Classifying households
- Very poor all households with income below 50
of the median York income - Poor all households with income more than 50 of
the median but lower than 75 of the median - Below-average all households living on incomes
higher than 75 of the median but less than or
equal to the median - Above-average all households living on incomes
higher than the median and lower than 125 of the
median - Affluent all households living on incomes above
125 of the median
38SimBritain results in York
39SimBritain results, York children in households
40Living standards of very poor households
41Living standards of very poor households
42Causes of poverty
43Very poor households sources of income
An analysis of persons in the city who are below
the primary poverty line shows that more than
one half of these are members of families whose
wage-earner is in work but in receipt of
insufficient wages. Rowntree (2000 114)
44The potential for policy analysis
Source The Guardian, 22 March 2000
45 46Simulating the spatial impact of policy reforms
- Family Credit and Tax Credit
- Minimum Income Guarantee
- Minimum wage
- Winter Fuel Payment and Free TV licence for the
elderly
47The estimated spatial impact in York
48The estimated spatial impact in Wales
49Social policy impacts at smaller area level an
example from Leeds
50Estimated spatial distribution of change in tax
paid under scenario 1
51Estimated spatial distribution of change in tax
paid under scenario 2
52Future challenges modelling income and
substitution effects
- A substitution effect making leisure more
attractive than work - An income effect, encouraging people to work more
to make up the loss of income - Different taxes have different effects, and
affect people at different levels of income or in
different household circumstances in different
ways. - (Hill and Bramley, 1986 85)
53Conclusions and future priorities
- Geography matters need to estimate the
geographical as well as the social, temporal and
economic impacts of policies - In some instances, spatial impacts of social
policies be compared with the respective impacts
of area-based policies, as social policies can be
seen as alternatives to area-based policies. - New approach to measuring deprivation at the
local level based on the measurement and analysis
of income and wealth distribution - Spatial microsimulation can be used for the
design of pro-active geographically-oriented
social policies
54Conclusions and future priorities
- SimBritain outputs there are trends of dramatic
increases of socio-economic polarisation in
Britain - Limitations of SimBritain localised factors
(e.g. large Universities) - Refine SimBritain
- Policy spatial micro-modelling - income and
substitution effect - Include more regional subsystems (labour demand,
schools, hospitals, etc.) - Small area multiplier analysis
- What-if, what-will-happen-if and
What-would-have-happened-if analysis