Title: Polarized Electron Sources for Future Colliders: Present Status and Prospects for Improvement
1Polarized Electron Sources for Future Colliders
Present Status and Prospects for Improvement
- J. Clendenin
- Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
- ALCPG Workshop
- SLAC, January 9, 2004
2Outline
- 1. Photocathode development
- a. Higher Pe
- b. Surface charge limit
- c. Other concerns
- 1) Lifetime
- 2) Stability (primarily a laser issue)
- 3) Reliability
- 2. Gun development
- 3. Laser systems (Brachmann)
3GaAs Direct band gap semiconductor symmetry at
G point a) unstrained b) strained
4Polarized Electron Photoemission from GaAs
Circularly polarized light (g), near band
gap, excites electron from valence band to
conduction band Electrons drift
band-bending region (BBR) near the surface
Electron emission to vacuum from
Negative-Electron-Affinity (NEA) surface
Cathode activation p-doped GaAs, energy bands
bend down at surface Ultra-High-Vacuum lt 10-11
Torr (at RT) Heat treatment at 600 C
Application of Cesium and oxide (O2 or
NF3) Result is vacuum level at surface is lower
than conduction band minimum in the bulk, i.e.,
NEA surface
5Polarization Achieved
SLC Pemax 78 (at source), 76 at Compton
polarimeter
6Future Directions for Pe
- Three areas possible reduction of depolarization
- Band splittingnow 80 meV
- Drift toward surfacelower dopant density or
provide electric field - BBR confinementreject low-energy e-?
- The BBR is most likely area for improvementto
study, need more reliable cathode activation
method
7Surface Charge Limit (SCL) Effect
Extreme case
- Some e- temporarily trapped near surface
- Result is surface affinity temporarily rises,
- reducing surface escape probability
- SLC relaxation time 10-100 ns for SLC
- photocathodes
8Solution is to increase dopant density at surface
(gradient doping), promotes tunneling of holes
to surfacerecombination with trapped
electronsprecluding rise in surface affinity
9(No Transcript)
10Quantum Efficiency (QE) Lifetime (t)
- QE decays at rate 1/t. QE restored by applying
additional Cs (total time 15-30 min.) Want tgtgt100
h - Key factor is vacuum both during cathode
activation and for normal operation - Ion back-bombardment
- Electron-stimulated gas desorption
- To date good vacuum engineering, use of
load-lock - New directions massive NEG arrays near cathode
materials with low secondary-electron cofficient
new methods of cleaning
11Reliability
- Load-lock dramatically improves system
reliability - New directions more reliable cathode activation
methods e.g., atomic hydrogen cleaning
12Gun Development
- Limitations of present DC-biased guns
- Space-charge limits current-density at gun
- Transverse emittance limited by cathode size
- Longitudinal emittance of beam increases because
of the low energy - Consequently
- Cannot now use laser to generate microstructure
(JLC/NLC)
13Modulation of SLAC Polarized Electron Beam
- Technique pass flash-Ti laser pulse (typically
100-300 ns) through Pockels cell modulated at 714
MHz - Result will be a train of mbunches spaced 1.4 ns
- Each mbunch will have 2 S-band buckets with
some charge inbetween mbunches - Beam-loading will limit peak current
- If Iavg in macrobunch is 0.5 A (E-158), then Ipk
in mbunch 2 A implying 4x109 e- in single
mpulse
14New Directions for Gun Design
- Higher DC voltage (500 kV?)
- Goal of 20-30 MV/m at cathode
- Additional compression of microbunches probably
required - Pulsed voltage
- Greatly improves HV standoff
- RF gun
- Typically 10-30 MV/m extraction voltage, beam
energy 2-5 MeV (or higher for multi-cell gun) - Chief concern is e- back-bombardment and
generation of secondary electrons - Hybrid gun DC (or pulsed) gun with anode the
input coupler to rf accelerating structure
15Conclusions
- Electron polarization of 90 at source now
available, prospect for 95 reasonably good - Surface charge limit probably will not be a
problem - Lifetime and reliability for existing DC guns
reasonable - New gun designs in development that may reduce
transverse and/or longitudinal emittance and for
JLC/NLC permit optical formation of micropulse
sturcture