Polarized Electron Sources for Future Colliders: Present Status and Prospects for Improvement - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Polarized Electron Sources for Future Colliders: Present Status and Prospects for Improvement

Description:

Extreme case: ... RF gun ... New gun designs in development that may reduce transverse and/or longitudinal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: jec2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Polarized Electron Sources for Future Colliders: Present Status and Prospects for Improvement


1
Polarized Electron Sources for Future Colliders
Present Status and Prospects for Improvement
  • J. Clendenin
  • Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
  • ALCPG Workshop
  • SLAC, January 9, 2004

2
Outline
  • 1. Photocathode development
  • a. Higher Pe
  • b. Surface charge limit
  • c. Other concerns
  • 1) Lifetime
  • 2) Stability (primarily a laser issue)
  • 3) Reliability
  • 2. Gun development
  • 3. Laser systems (Brachmann)

3
GaAs Direct band gap semiconductor symmetry at
G point a) unstrained b) strained
4
Polarized Electron Photoemission from GaAs
Circularly polarized light (g), near band
gap, excites electron from valence band to
conduction band Electrons drift
band-bending region (BBR) near the surface
Electron emission to vacuum from
Negative-Electron-Affinity (NEA) surface
Cathode activation p-doped GaAs, energy bands
bend down at surface Ultra-High-Vacuum lt 10-11
Torr (at RT) Heat treatment at 600 C
Application of Cesium and oxide (O2 or
NF3) Result is vacuum level at surface is lower
than conduction band minimum in the bulk, i.e.,
NEA surface
5
Polarization Achieved
SLC Pemax 78 (at source), 76 at Compton
polarimeter
6
Future Directions for Pe
  • Three areas possible reduction of depolarization
  • Band splittingnow 80 meV
  • Drift toward surfacelower dopant density or
    provide electric field
  • BBR confinementreject low-energy e-?
  • The BBR is most likely area for improvementto
    study, need more reliable cathode activation
    method

7
Surface Charge Limit (SCL) Effect
Extreme case
  • Some e- temporarily trapped near surface
  • Result is surface affinity temporarily rises,
  • reducing surface escape probability
  • SLC relaxation time 10-100 ns for SLC
  • photocathodes

8
Solution is to increase dopant density at surface
(gradient doping), promotes tunneling of holes
to surfacerecombination with trapped
electronsprecluding rise in surface affinity
9
(No Transcript)
10
Quantum Efficiency (QE) Lifetime (t)
  • QE decays at rate 1/t. QE restored by applying
    additional Cs (total time 15-30 min.) Want tgtgt100
    h
  • Key factor is vacuum both during cathode
    activation and for normal operation
  • Ion back-bombardment
  • Electron-stimulated gas desorption
  • To date good vacuum engineering, use of
    load-lock
  • New directions massive NEG arrays near cathode
    materials with low secondary-electron cofficient
    new methods of cleaning

11
Reliability
  • Load-lock dramatically improves system
    reliability
  • New directions more reliable cathode activation
    methods e.g., atomic hydrogen cleaning

12
Gun Development
  • Limitations of present DC-biased guns
  • Space-charge limits current-density at gun
  • Transverse emittance limited by cathode size
  • Longitudinal emittance of beam increases because
    of the low energy
  • Consequently
  • Cannot now use laser to generate microstructure
    (JLC/NLC)

13
Modulation of SLAC Polarized Electron Beam
  • Technique pass flash-Ti laser pulse (typically
    100-300 ns) through Pockels cell modulated at 714
    MHz
  • Result will be a train of mbunches spaced 1.4 ns
  • Each mbunch will have 2 S-band buckets with
    some charge inbetween mbunches
  • Beam-loading will limit peak current
  • If Iavg in macrobunch is 0.5 A (E-158), then Ipk
    in mbunch 2 A implying 4x109 e- in single
    mpulse

14
New Directions for Gun Design
  • Higher DC voltage (500 kV?)
  • Goal of 20-30 MV/m at cathode
  • Additional compression of microbunches probably
    required
  • Pulsed voltage
  • Greatly improves HV standoff
  • RF gun
  • Typically 10-30 MV/m extraction voltage, beam
    energy 2-5 MeV (or higher for multi-cell gun)
  • Chief concern is e- back-bombardment and
    generation of secondary electrons
  • Hybrid gun DC (or pulsed) gun with anode the
    input coupler to rf accelerating structure

15
Conclusions
  • Electron polarization of 90 at source now
    available, prospect for 95 reasonably good
  • Surface charge limit probably will not be a
    problem
  • Lifetime and reliability for existing DC guns
    reasonable
  • New gun designs in development that may reduce
    transverse and/or longitudinal emittance and for
    JLC/NLC permit optical formation of micropulse
    sturcture
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com