Title: WHAT ARE THE HUMANITIES
1WHAT ARE THE HUMANITIES?
2DISCIPLINES IN THE HUMANITIES AT SUSSEX
- American Studies
- Art History
- English (including English Language and Drama)
- History
- Languages
- Media and Film Studies
- Music
- Philosophy
3OED Definition
- Learning or literature concerned with human
culture a term including the various branches of
polite scholarship, as grammar, rhetoric, poetry,
and esp. the study of the ancient Latin and Greek
classics.    a. sing. (Still used in the Scottish
Universities, in the sense of the study of the
Latin language and literature.)
4Humanities as Salvation?
- in our truest readings, as students, we searched
the page for guidance, guidance in perplexity. We
found it in Lawrence, or we found it in Eliot,
the early Eliot. The rest of our reading, by
comparison, was just a matter of mugging things
up so we could pass exams. - If the humanities want to survive, surely It
is those energies and that craving for guidance
that they must respond to a craving that is, in
the end, a quest for salvation. - J.M. Coetzee, Elizabeth Costello
5Humanities as critique?
- It is the humanities and the humanities alone
that will allow us to steer our way through this
multicultural world, precisely because the
humanities are about reading and interpretation.
The humanities begin in textual scholarship, and
develop as a body of disciplines devoted to
interpretation. - J.M. Coetzee, Elizabeth Costello
6Humanities as commodity?
- Faculties of Humanities remain the core of any
university. - The humanities the core of the university?
She may be an outsider, but if she were asked to
name the core of the university today, its core
discipline, she would say it was moneymaking.
That is how it looks from Melbourne, Victoria
and she would not be surprised if the same were
the case in Johannesburg, South Africa. - J. M. Coetzee, Elizabeth Costello
7Globalisation and the Humanities
8Globalisation, Violence and the End of Literature.
- Theodor Adorno, Cultural Criticism and Society,
in Prisms, 1955. - The sinister, integrated society of today no
longer tolerates even those relatively
independent, distinct moments to which the theory
of the causal dependence of superstructure on
base once referred. In the open-air prison which
the world is becoming, it is no longer so
important to know what depends on what, such is
the extent to which all things are one. All
phenomena rigidify, become insignias of the
absolute rule of that which is . To write
poetry after Auschwitz is barbaric. And this
corrodes even the knowledge of why it has become
impossible to write poetry today.
9Fiction, Globalisation and Terrorism
- Don DeLillo, Mao II (1992)
- Theres a curious knot that binds novelists and
terrorists. In the West we become famous effigies
as our books lose the power to shape and
influence. Years ago I used to think it was
possible for a novelist to alter the inner life
of a culture. Now bomb-makers and gunmen have
taken that territory. They make raids on human
consciousness. What writers used to do before we
were all incorporated.
10mechanical reproduction and global violence
11Art, commodity culture, and mechanical
reproduction
- Andy Warhol, Campbells Soup
12Francis Fukyama and the end of history
- "What we may be witnessing is not just the end of
the Cold War or the passing of a particular
period of post-war history, but the end of
history as such that is, the end point of
mankind's ideological evolution and the
universalization of Western liberal democracy as
the final form of human government."
13September 11thAn end to the end of
history?Questioning the inevitability of global
capitalism and the universalisation of Western
liberal democracy
14Don DeLillo In the Ruins of the Future
- In the past decade the surge of capital markets
has dominated discourse and shaped global
consciousness. Multinational corporations have
come to seem more vital and influential than
governments. The dramatic climb of the Dow and
the speed of the internet summoned us all to live
permanently in the future, in the utopian glow of
cyber-capital, because there is no memory there
and this is where markets are uncontrolled and
investment potential has no limit. All this
changed on September 11.
15Don DeLillo
- The sense of disarticulation we hear in the term
"Us and Them" has never been so striking, at
either end. - Two forces in the world, past and future. With
the end of communism, the ideas and principles of
modern democracy were seen clearly to prevail,
whatever the inequalities of the system itself.
This is still the case. But now there is a global
theocratic state, unboundaried and floating and
so obsolete it must depend on suicidal fervour to
gain its aims.
16George Bush
- You are either with us or against us in this war
on terror
17George Bush
- 'The terrorists are fighting freedom with all
their cunning and cruelty because freedom is
their greatest fear and they should be afraid,
because freedom is on the march'
18Tony Blair
- This is a moment to seize.
- The Kaleidoscope has been shaken. The pieces are
in flux. Soon they will settle again. - Before they do, let us re-order this world around
us.
19Humanities as an engine forcounternarrative
critiqueinterpretation
20Don DeLillo
- Terror brings the new future into being
- The Bush administration was feeling a nostalgia
for the cold war. This is over now. Many things
are over. The narrative ends in the rubble and it
is left to us to create the counternarrative.
219/11 Fiction
- Jonathan Safran Foer, Extremely Loud and
Incredibly Close - John Updike, Terrorist
- Don DeLillo, Falling Man
- Mohsin Hamid, The Reluctant Fundamentalist
- Ian McEwan, Saturday
- Orhan Pamuck, Snow
- Julia Glass, The Whole World Over
- Ken Kalfus, A Disorder Peculiar to Our Country
- Claire Messud, The Emperors Children
- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
- Martin Amis, The Last Hours of Mohhamad Atta
22Some implications for the study and practice of
humanities
- Cultural hegemony
- with us or against us
- Structuralism
- text
- what it is
- Absolute meaning
- Fixed meaning
- Closed reading
- Dialogical plurality
- multiculturalism
- Semantics
- context
- what it might mean
- Multiple interpretations
- Changing meaning(s)
- Open reading
239/11 - the closing-off of dialogue?
- The parable of Pierre Boulez, the problem of
opera, and international anti-terrorist laws! - ....a woeful tale of closed reading in the
hegemonic climate of anti-terror paranoia...
24Swiss Terror Swoop Discomposes Boulez, 75 (The
Guardian 05/12/01)
- At dawn on 2 November 2001, less than two months
after the attacks on the World Trade Center in
New York, Pierre Boulez was arrested in his Basle
hotel bedroom on suspicion of international
terrorism. Ignorant of musicological protocol,
the Swiss police had mistaken his infamous
suggestion of the late 1960s that the most
elegant solution to the problem of opera is to
blow-up the opera houses1 for a literal call to
arms and targeted him as a threat to world
security. - (Ben Parsons, Arresting Boulez Post-war
modernism in context JRMA 129 no. 1 161176, p.
161) - 1 Pierre Boulez, Jan Buzga Interview mit Pierre
Boulez in Prag, Melos, 34 (1967), 1624 English
trans. in Opera, 19 (1968), 44050.
25Discomposed Boulez cont.
- The Swiss polices faux pas is coloured by a
somewhat uncomfortable irony. In the context of a
historical process in which Boulez has been
iconicized as a defender and legitimator of
abstract organizational principles, we are not
used to having to make the connection between him
and the problems and politics of a real world
that lies outside the boundaries of the narrowly
defined serial aesthetic. (ibid.)
26Discomposed Boulez cont.
- we tend not to mix post-war serial music with
what might be called the extra-musical. Indeed,
it is this very understanding of early serialism
that has marked out what Richard Taruskin has
characterized as a cordon sanitaire around the
Music Itself a decontaminated space within
which music can be composed, performed and
listened to in a cultural and historical vacuum,
that is, in perfect sterility1 (Parsons, ibid.) - 1 Richard Taruskin, Stravinsky and the Subhuman,
a Myth of the Twentieth Century The Rite of
Spring, - the Tradition of the New, and the Music Itself
, Defining Russia Musically Historical and
Hermeneutical - Essays (Princeton, 1997 repr. 2000), 36088 (p.
368).
27Problems of the parable of Boulez
- Absurd confusion of a subtle intellectual
critique, set in the context of 1960s modern
opera, for an absolute, decontextualised, literal
(mis)reading of a terrorist threat. - Failure to stop and think!
- Failure to be still and know!
- Questions whether art/critique is itself a
political act or whether it sometimes needs a
decontaminated space in which to speculate
28Is music/art engaged with the real world?
- 2 Examples of highly repetitive structures (Ă la
Warhol) - Pierre Boulezs Ritual (1974) Perfect sterility?
- Organised Delirium - exists in a
cordon-sanitaire - Can we merely explain how it is structured/made?
- vs.
- John Adams Death of Klinghoffer (1991)
Politically engaged? - Coincidence recorded on 9/11 - appropriates new
context - Immediately censored an opera about
terrorism!
29Klinghoffer and Terrorism
- It happened that the world premiere of John
Adams The Death of Klinghoffer...took place
in...1991, during the First Gulf War. The
subject of the opera is the hijacking of the
Italian cruise liner Achille Lauro by Palestinian
terrorists in 1985. Pickets from the Jewish
Information League staged demonstrations outside
the theatre in San Francisco. The problem was
that Adams had dared to give an equal voice to
both sides, making no judgment as to who is right
and who is wrong. (Oh that politicians would do
the same.)....The demonstrators presumably saw in
this work insufficient condemnation of the
terrorists... (Stephen Pettitt The Death of
Klinghoffer, Decca DVD inlay card.)
30Klinghoffer and Terrorism
- Disgracefully, the work has not been staged in
America since that run. Moreover, a performance
of choruses from the opera scheduled in Boston
late in 2001 was also cancelled because of
sensitivities arising from the events of 11
September, a decision with which the composer
angrily disagreed, not only because it presumes
the...audiences only want comfort and familiarity
during these difficult times, but also because it
sets a precedent that there is poetry and music
that should not be performed at a given moment
because of its content. Klinghoffer has
effectively suffered censorship, and that in a
state that consistently asserts its love of
freedom. ( ibid.)
319/11 shook the kaleidoscope
- 9/11, like Auschwitz before it, shook the
kaleidoscope (to paraphrase Tony Blair) of art. - A number of reactions ensued before the
kaleidoscope settled - In its wake, as Adorno felt half a century
earlier, it was natural to question whether we
could continue to make art or write about it. - Was art now rendered a distasteful indulgence
protected from harsh reality by its various
cordon sanitairesmuseums galleries concert
halls opera houses literary texts digital
media linguistic games historical archives? - Or were such decontaminated, apolitical spaces
vital for art and critique to survive and
paradoxically become political?
329/11 shook the kaleidoscope cont.
- But art also offered consolation
- on the night of 9/11, the BBC Proms programme
changed to a programme of respectful,
comforting American Nationalism (e.g. Barbers
Adagio) - But the most distasteful paradox of all.....
- some tried to regard 9/11 itself as a work of art
- the greatest ever!
33E.g. 1 Stockhausen on 9/11
- Composer Karlheinz Stockhausen was forced to
apologise for describing the terrorists' attack
on the World Trade Centre as "the greatest work
of art one can imagine". - (See Kate Connolly, Twin Towers Symbolised
Arrogance, says Top Designer, The Guardian
16/10/2001.) - He actually referred to it as "the greatest work
of art by Lucifer. In his apology he said that
his comments had been misconstrued and he had
been horrified by the atrocity. - Beware the dangers of selective quotation!
34E.g. 2 Damien Hirst on 9/11...
- The artist Damien Hirst said...he believed the
terrorists responsible for the September 11
attacks "need congratulating" because they
achieved "something which nobody would ever have
thought possible" on an artistic level. Hirst,
who is no stranger to controversy, said many
people would "shy away" from looking at the event
as art but he believed the World Trade Centre
attack was "kind of like an artwork in its own
right". - (See Rebecca Allison, 9/11 wicked but a work of
art, says Damien Hirst, The Guardian 11/9/2002.)
35Damien Hirst cont....
- "The thing about 9/11 is that...it was wicked,
but it was devised in this way for this kind of
impact. It was devised visually." Describing the
image of the hijacked planes crashing into the
twin towers as "visually stunning", he added
"You've got to hand it to them on some level
because they've achieved something which nobody
would have ever have thought possible. (ibid.)
36Damien Hirst cont....
- Referring to how the event changed perceptions,
he added "I think our visual language has been
changed by what happened on September 11 an
aeroplane becomes a weapon - and if they fly
close to buildings people start panicking. Our
visual language is constantly changing in this
way and I think as an artist you're constantly on
the lookout for things like that." (ibid.)
37Dangers of dehumanised structuralist analysis
- 9/11 becomes objectified, even commodified
-
- described dispassionately as a series of
structural visual elements utterly removed from
the context of those visual elements! - 9/11 is made into a text
-
- Paradox of art decontextualising terrorism and
appropriating it for itself - Inverse of Nazi/Fascist propaganda in which
terrorism appropriated art for its own ends. -
38Humanities and ethicsAn ethics derived from
the suspension of ethical engagementAn ethics
derived from balancing thought in both political
and depolitical spacesAn ethics derived from
being still and knowing