Writing a More Effective Proposal for the New CCLI Solicitation PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Writing a More Effective Proposal for the New CCLI Solicitation


1
National Science Foundation Update What
s New at DUE? The 19th Biennial Conference on
Chemical Education Monday, July 31,
2006 Kathleen Parson (Chemistry) Program
Director Susan Hixson Hal
Richtol Harry Ungar Division of
Undergraduate Education
2
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
  • DIVISION OF UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION (DUE)

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Selected Programs
CCLI Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory
Improvement S-STEM Scholarships in Science,
Technology,Engineering, and
Mathematics (formerly CSEMS) STEP STEM
Talent Expansion Program ATE Advanced
Technological Education Robert Noyce Scholarship
Program Scholarships for STEM Teacher
Preparation Stipends for STEM career changers
New
7
CCLI
  • Vision
  • Excellent STEM education for all undergraduate
    students.
  • Goal
  • Stimulate, disseminate, and institutionalize
    innovative developments in STEM education through
    the production of knowledge and the improvement
    of practice.
  • Our broadest, most innovative program

8
Increased Emphases in New Solicitation
  • Build on and contribute to the STEM education
    knowledge base
  • Build a community of scholars in STEM education
    reform
  • Identify project-specific measurable outcomes
  • Project management and evaluation

9
Deadlines
  • Phase 1   May (?), 2007
  • Phase 2 3  January 10, 2007
  • Send it in early!

10
Cyclic Model for Creating Knowledge andImproving
Practices in STEM Education
11
Five Components from the Cyclic Model
Materials
Expertise
Research
Implement
Assess
  • Include one or more of these components
  • Create learning materials and teaching
    strategies
  • Develop faculty expertise
  • Implement educational innovations
  • Assess learning and evaluate innovation
  • Conduct research on STEM teaching and
    learning

12
Component 1
Materials
Expertise
Research
Implement
Assess
  • Create Learning Materials and Teaching Strategies
  • New materials and tools
  • New methods and strategies
  • Revised materials and strategies

13
Component 2
Materials
Expertise
Research
Implement
Assess
  • Develop Faculty Expertise
  • New Methods (e.g. web based)
  • From short-term workshops to sustained
    activities
  • Foster new communities of practicing educators
  • Diverse group of faculty
  • Cost-effective professional development

14
Component 3
Materials
Expertise
Research
Implement
Assess
  • Implement Educational Innovations
  • Disseminate proven learning materials, teaching
    strategies, or faculty-development methods
  • From CCLI projects or other sources
  • Local adaptation and implementation projects
    acceptable
  • Include instrumentation to support such projects
  • No cost sharing

15
Component 4
Materials
Expertise
Research
Implement
Assess
  • Assess Learning and
  • Evaluate Innovations
  • Design and test new assessment and evaluation
    tools and processes.
  • Apply new and existing tools to conduct
    broad-based assessments
  • Must span multiple projects and be of general
    interest

16
Component 5
Materials
Expertise
Research
Implement
Assess
  • Conduct Research on STEM Teaching and Learning
  • Synthesize previous results and theories
  • Practical focus
  • Testable new ideas
  • Impact on STEM educational practices
  • Publication contribute to the knowledge base

17
Three Sizes of Projects
  • Phase 1
  • 150,000 1 to 3 years
  • 50,000 with community college partner
  • Phase 2
  • 500,000 2 to 4 years
  • Phase 3
  • 2,000,000 3 to 5 years

18
Phases Reflect
  • Scope of the Project
  • Number of components in the cyclic model
  • Scale of the Project
  • Number of institutions, students and faculty
  • Maturity of the Project
  • Phase 1 may lead to Phase 2, etc.
  • Not required

19
Cyclic Model
20
Phase 1
  • Scope and Scale
  • One program component
  • Limited number of students faculty at one
    institution
  • Expected Results
  • Contribute to the STEM education knowledge base
  • Can serve as basis for Phase 2 project

21
Phase 2
  • Scope and Scale
  • Build on smaller-scale proven ideas
  • Two or more components of the cyclic model
  • Diverse users in several settings
  • Expected Results
  • Conclusive results
  • Successful products and processes ready for wide
    distribution and commercialization
  • Can serve as basis for Phase 3 project

22
Phase 3
  • Scope and Scale
  • Combine proven results and mature products
  • Several components of the cyclic model
  • Involve several diverse institutions
  • Expected Results
  • Evaluation activities deep and broad
  • Demonstrate the impact -- many students and
    faculty -- wide range of institutions.
  • Dissemination and outreach have national impact

23
NSFs outline
  • READ THE SOLICITATION!
  • Goals, Objectives, and Outcomes
  • Rationale Reasons for doing it
  • Project Plan Clear description of what you want
    to do
  • Evaluation formative summative
  • How will you know whether you have accomplished
    your goals objectives?
  • Dissemination

24
Examples of Phase I Awards
  • Otterbein College DUE0546710 Visual-Spatial
    Learning Development of an Interactive Web-Based
    Symmetry Tutorial
  • U of Alabama at Birmingham DUE 0536039 POGIL
    in Preparatory Chemistry
  • U MN Morris DUE0535763 Integration of
    Conducting Polymers Across the UG Chemistry
    Curriculum
  • U of Detroit Mercy DUE 0535943 AA
    Spectroscopy for Interdisciplinary Environmental
    Studies
  • Loyola U New Orleans DUE0535957 Greening
    the Chemistry Laboratory Curriculum at LU/NO
  • Texas AM DUE0536673 Anchoring Organic
    Chemistry in Broad Context
  • Everett CC DUE0535624 Addition of Low-Field
    FT-NMR and FT-IR Spectroscopy for the Enhancement
    of the Chemistry Laboratory Curriculum
  • Award Abstracts are available on the DUE web
    site.

25
S-STEM
New
  • Scholarships
  • Science, Technology,
  • Engineering, and Mathematics
  • An enlarged version of CSEMS

26
  • Awards to colleges and universities to provide
    scholarships to their students
  • Scholarships are part of a project to attract,
    retain, and place students. The goal is to
    increase the number and quality of graduates in
    the sciences
  • Promotes learning communities

27
Student requirements
  • US Citizen or permanent resident
  • Eligible for need-based Federal financial aid
  • Enrolled in a program leading to a degree in one
    of the STEM disciplines
  • Degree may be Associate, Bachelors, or Graduate
  • Full-time enrollment
  • Demonstrate academic ability or potential
  • Scholarship may be for up to 10,000 per year,
    depending on financial need

28
Proposal
  • PI is faculty member in one of the STEM
    disciplines
  • Others involved include faculty, financial aid,
    and student support staff
  • Plan for selecting students and managing project
  • Plan for using existing support student
    structures or creating new ones
  • Plan for evaluating success of project

29
Budget
  • 125,000 per year for up to 4 years 500,000
    maximum award
  • No indirect costs
  • Allowance of 8 for student support costs
  • 7 for administrative costs
  • About 110 grants each year
  • Due Date April (?), 2007

30
STEP STEM Talent Expansion Program
  • Types of Proposals
  • Type 1 (10 to 20 awards)
  • strategies to increase student numbers
  • New numbers cannot come from other disciplines
  • Type 2 (1 to 3 awards) research on degree
    attainment in STEM
  • Program Deadline
  • Letter of Intent August 15, 2006
  • Proposal Due Date September 26, 2006

31
STEP STEM Talent Expansion Program
  • Outcomes expected
  • Description of activities institutionalized from
    project
  • Plan for continuing efforts to increase number of
    STEM students
  • Evaluation of progress
  • Dissemination of project results to broader
    community

32
STEP STEM Talent Expansion Program
  • Budgetary Limitations
  • Type 1 (Implementation)
  • 500 K for 5 years for up to 5,000 undergrad
    students
  • 1.0 M for 5 years for 5,000-15,000 undergrad
    students
  • 2.0 M for 5 years for gt15,000 undergrad students
  • Type 2 (Educational Research)
  • 500 K per year for 1-3 years
  • One proposal per institution
  • (can be a partner on only one proposal)
  • 25 million available in 2005

33
Award Supplement Opportunities
  • Research Experiences for Teachers (RET)
  • Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU)
  • Research Opportunity Awards (ROA)
  • Research Assistantships for Minority High School
  • Students (RAMHSS)
  • Informal Science Education Supplements
  • International Research and Education Supplements
  • Facilitation Award for Scientists and Engineers
    with Disabilities

34
Information and Inquiries
  • DUE Information System
  • Email undergrad_at_nsf.gov
  • Phone 703-292-8670
  • Fax 703-292-9015
  • DUE Web Site
  • http//www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?divDUE
  • Create a MyNSF personalized alert service
  • DUE Mailing Address
  • NSF, Division of Undergraduate Education
  • 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 835
  • Arlington, VA 22230
  • VOLUNTEER TO REVIEW PROPOSALS!
  • CONTACT A PROGRAM OFFICER SEE DUE WEB SITE!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com