LITIGATION UPDATE MAMWA JANUARY 26, 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

LITIGATION UPDATE MAMWA JANUARY 26, 2005

Description:

OECA indicated HERE last year that EPA may be close to done ... 'Federal agencies contacted the state between Christmas and New Year with the new requirement. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: aqua1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LITIGATION UPDATE MAMWA JANUARY 26, 2005


1
EXCELLENCE IN ENGINEERING SINCE 1946
2
Federal/State Dynamics Play Out in Kentucky
  • CSO Control Strategies and Key Developments Among
    CSO Communities
  • April 26-27, 2007
  • Chicago, IL

3
  • Map of CSO communities

4
CSO Communities in KY
  • Community CSOs Population
  • Louisville MSD 115 430,000
  • SD1 74 335,000
  • Frankfort 15 50,611
  • Owensboro 8
    54,000
  • Paducah 11 34,500
  • Ashland 8 30,000
  • Henderson 14 29,500

5
CSO Communities in KY
  • Community CSOs Population
  • Pikeville 3 10,000
  • Pineville 3 9,100
  • Maysville 11
    8,950
  • Prestonburg 1
    4,800
  • Catlettsburg 17 4,100
  • Morganfield 2 3,850
  • Harlan 1 3,786
  • Worthington 3
    2,168
  • Vanceburg 5
    2,038
  • Loyall 6 1,322

6
Chronology
  • May 2004 USEPA submits 308 Requests to several
    KY CSO communities.
  • August 2004 Joint USEPA/KDOW compliance
    inspections of several communities.
  • April 2005 Lou MSD Joint Federal/State CD
  • October 2005 SD1 Joint Federal/State CD
  • June 2006 KDOW Inspections of communities
  • May 2006 KDOW initiates Consent Judgment
    process with remaining communities.

7
Federal/State Actions
  • Louisville MSD April 2005
  • Joint State/Federal Order filed in Federal Court
    (LaJuana Wilcher, Cabinet Secretary)
  • SD1 Filed October, 2005
  • special interest group challenged schedule
  • decree entered by the Court on 4/18/07

8
What about the smaller communities?
  • EPA enforcement guidance contemplates larger
    systems or where national interests implicated.
  • OECA indicated HERE last year that EPA may be
    close to done with CSO enforcement and smaller
    systems will be dealt with by the States

9
City of Frankfort, KY
  • Notice of Draft Consent Judgment
  • November 2006
  • 30 day public comment period
  • State Action

10
Key Elements
  • Activities necessary to comply with 1994 CSO
    Policy
  • Activities necessary to eliminate recurring
    SSOs.
  • Implementation of a CMOM program
  • Public Notice

11
Key Elements
  • Fully implement LTCP by 12/30/2026
  • Eliminate all recurring SSOs within 8 years from
    entry of judgment.
  • Pay a 50,000 civil penalty
  • Public Notice

12
USEPA weighs in
  • and now the federal environmental agency wants
    Frankfort to justify the deadlines in the
    judgment.
  • Federal agencies contacted the state between
    Christmas and New Year with the new requirement.
  • State-Journal 1/11/07

13
USEPA weighs in
  • The city must present documentation within about
    two weeks to prove why the deadlines in the
    consent judgment are fair specifically eight
    years to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows and
    17 to implement a long-term control plan.
  • State-Journal 1/11/07

14
Key Issue
  • Timeframes/schedules for LTCP
  • Regulators being very aggressive.
  • Inconsistency between regulatory agencies
    states and EPA Regions.
  • Schedule dependent on
  • Ability to pay
  • Constructability sequencing, plan, design,
    financing, permitting, construction

15
Memo to KDOW
  • Once the permittee has completed development
    of the long-term CSO control plan and the
    selection of the controls necessary to meet CWA
    requirements has been coordinated with the
    permitting and WQS authorities
  • FR pg. 18696

16
MEMO TO KDOW
  • the permitting authority should include, in an
    appropriate enforceable mechanism, requirements
    for implementation of the long-term CSO control
    plan as soon as practicable.
  • FR pg. 18696

17
MEMO TO KDOW
  • Implementation Schedule
  • The permittee should include all pertinent
    information in the long term control plan
    necessary to develop the construction and
    financing schedule for implementation of CSO
    controls.
  • FR pg. 18694

18
KDOW MEMO
  • Schedules for implementation of the CSO
    controls may be phased based on the relative
    importance of adverse impacts upon WQS and
    designated uses, priority projects identified in
    the long-term plan, and on a permittees
    financial capability.
  • FR pg. 18694

19
MEMO TO KDOW
  • Without having a well defined plan developed, it
    does not seem appropriate to try to establish a
    completion deadline.

20
Example Decrees
  • Federal Consent Decrees
  • Youngstown, OH
  • Bangor, ME
  • South Portland, ME
  • Numerous Region 5 Decrees that are pending
    incorporate this approach.

21
Status
  • Appears that KDOW is now considering a variety of
    approaches regarding LTCP schedule. No decision
    made yet.

22
Status
  • CJs finalized by July 2007???
  • State being very aggressive

23
Conclusion
  • Stick to the national CSO Policy.
  • Be wary of agreeing to an end date for your
    program when your program is not yet
    well-defined.
  • States should lead enforcement actions where they
    are willing and able
  • EPA OW needs to designate a new National CSO
    Program Manager.

24
Contact Information
John Lyons Strand Associates, Inc. 513-861-5600
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com