Compensating Wage Differentials - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Compensating Wage Differentials

Description:

The Market for Risky Jobs. Can think of ?w as a reservation price. ... Compensating wage differentials reflect the value of non-wage job attributes if: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:948
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: kateanto
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Compensating Wage Differentials


1
Compensating Wage Differentials
2
Not All Jobs Are Created Equal
  • Risk of death or injury on the job.
  • Location.
  • Flexibility of hours.
  • Health benefits.
  • Pension plans.
  • Repetitiveness of tasks.
  • Weeks of vacation.

3
Compensating Wage Differentials
  • Worker heterogeneity.
  • Workers may value different job attributes
    differently.
  • Firm heterogeneity.
  • Some firms may find it more costly to provide
    on-the-job benefits than others.
  • In equilibrium
  • Wages will compensate workers for job
    attributes.
  • Firms and workers will match with each other so
    that firms that find it easy to provide amenities
    will match with workers who value those
    amenities the most highly.

4
Fatality Rate by Industry, 1998
5
San Diego, CA vs. Tallahassee, FL
6
The Market for Risky Jobs
  • Two types of jobs risk of injury0 or risk of
    injury1
  • Workers have complete information about risks.
  • Utilityf(w, risk)

Worker prefers risky job
w1
w1
Wage that makes worker indifferent
w1
Worker prefers safe job
w0
?ww1-w0
Probability of Injury
0
1
7
The Market for Risky Jobs
  • Can think of ?w as a reservation price.
  • Amount you have to bribe someone to take the
    risky job.
  • Workers differ in terms of ?w.
  • As ?w grows, the supply of workers to the risky
    job will increase.
  • Firms differ in how costly it is for them to
    reduce risk.
  • Firms balance the cost of reducing the risk
    against ?w.
  • As ?w grows, more firms will find it worthwhile
    to incur the cost of reducing the risk on the
    job.
  • Thus, as ?w grows, the demand for workers in the
    risky job will go down.

8
The Market for Risky Jobs
w1-w0
S
Equilibrium wage differential greater than
workers reservation wage
(w1-w0)
D
Number of Workers in Risky Jobs
E
9
Underlying Assumptions
  • Compensating wage differentials reflect the value
    of non-wage job attributes if
  • Workers maximize utility, not income
  • Workers have perfect information about all job
    characteristics.
  • Sufficient labor mobility exists.
  • You can also think about favorable non-wage job
    attributes.

10
Hedonic Wage Theory
  • Suppose there are many types of jobs, a risky job
    and a safe job.
  • Firms and workers observe those characteristics
    and know their value.
  • We only observe the wage (and not the price of
    other job characteristics).
  • But we would like to know the value of the
    characteristics.
  • I.e. We want to know much do we have to pay for
    health benefits, coffee and donuts in the
    morning, etc. in the form of lower wages.

11
Individuals
Indifference Curves
  • Positive relationship between risk and wages.
  • Implicit in graph marginal disutility of risk
    is increasing.

12
Individual Heterogeneity
w
More risk averse
Less risk averse
Risk
13
Firms
  • Firms differ along two dimension
  • Wages
  • Level of risk
  • Firms attract workers by
  • Reducing risk.
  • Raising wages.
  • Both actions result lower profits.

14
Isoprofits
  • Isoprofits the combinations of wages and risk
    levels that result in a fixed level of profits.
  • Positive relationship between wages and risk.
  • Implicit in graph marginal cost of reducing risk
    is increasing.
  • p0 in long run.

15
Firm Heterogeneity
w
p0 High cost of reducing risk
p0 Low cost of reducing risk
Risk
16
The More Risk Averse Worker
Wage
More risk averse
p 0 High cost of reducing risk
p 0 Low cost of reducing risk
Risk
17
The More Less Averse Worker
Wage
Less risk averse
p 0 High cost of reducing risk
p 0 Low cost of reducing risk
Risk
18
Equilibrium
Less risk averse
Wage
More risk averse
p 0 High cost of reducing risk
w2
p 0 Low cost of reducing risk
w1
R1
R2
Risk
19
MatchingMany Types
Wage

Tells you the relationship between wages and risk
in equilibrium. Slope is positive

Risk
20
Empirical Evidence on Compensating Wage
Differentials
  • In general, there is weak empirical evidence that
    compensating wage differentials exist.
  • This doesnt necessarily mean that they are not
    there, it may just means that our statistical
    techniques have failed to uncover them.
  • However, one very prominent study found that
    mandated maternity benefits for women resulted in
    lower wages for women.
  • Still an active area of research.

21
Mandated Safety and Health Regulations
  • Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA)
  • Charged the U.S. Department of Labor with
    protecting health and safety of American labor
    force.
  • OSHA sets safety and health standards in the
    workplace.
  • Restrictions on dust and asbestos in air.
  • Fall protection at construction sites.
  • Noise control regulations.
  • ENORMOUSLY wide range of regulations.

22
Are These Safety Regulations a Good Idea?
  • Despite the ideal that employees should face the
    minimum possible risk on the job, health and
    safety regulations are not necessarily in the
    best interest of workers.
  • Why regulations may be bad . . .
  • Why regulations may be good . . .

23
Why Regulations May Be Bad
wage
IC1
IC2
Simple case with only 1 kind of firm. Regulation
caps the risk level at Rmax. New wage of Wmax.
Worker utility decreases. Intuition
p0
wmax
Risk
Rmax
24
Why Regulations May Be Good
wage
ICPERCEIVED
Economic efficiency assumes that people have
perfect information. People may not understand
the full implications of health risks. OSHA
standards can increase utility.
ICTRUE
p0
w
Risk
RPERCEIVED
RTRUE
RMAX
25
Bigger Lesson About Regulation
  • If the following three conditions hold
  • Markets are perfectly competitive
  • Information is perfect
  • There are no externalities
  • then economic theory predicts that government
    regulation is inefficient.
  • BUT there are many cases in which 1.-3. do not
    hold.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com