Under the Radar: How New Business Strategies Are Moving Jobs Outside the Reach of Regulation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Under the Radar: How New Business Strategies Are Moving Jobs Outside the Reach of Regulation

Description:

Jobs that are legally covered by employment and labor laws, but where employers ... amount of structure in how workers move between unregulated jobs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: annetteb8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Under the Radar: How New Business Strategies Are Moving Jobs Outside the Reach of Regulation


1
Under the RadarHow New Business Strategies Are
Moving Jobs Outside the Reach of Regulation
  • Annette Bernhardt, James DeFilippis, Nina Martin
    and Siobhan McGrath
  • Presented at the Annual Meetings of the
    Industrial Relations Research Association,
    January 2005

2
The problem
  • On the ground, community groups and unions are
    reporting growing numbers of jobs where core
    employment and labor laws are being broken what
    we call unregulated work.
  • Minimum wage and overtime violations, unsafe
    working conditions, discrimination, retaliation
    for speaking up or organizing (e.g. FLSA, OSHA,
    NLRA, Workers Comp)
  • Raises a series of questions
  • Where do unregulated jobs exist? Who works in
    them? Who are the employers? What are the
    different types of violations?
  • How common are workplace violations? Are they
    growing?
  • What are the causes and drivers of unregulated
    work?

3
Defining unregulated work
  • Jobs that are legally covered by employment and
    labor laws, but where employers routinely violate
    one or more of those laws.
  • Jobs that are not legally covered by employment
    and labor laws, even though there is effectively
    an employment relationship, and where conditions
    of work consistently fail to meet one or more
    standards of workplace regulation.

4
The study
  • Three-year study, New York City and Chicago
  • Phase 1 Descriptive initial mapping of the
    landscape.
  • Phase 2 Understanding the causes shift to
    intensive employer and worker interviews
  • Phase 3 Develop survey methodology for
    estimating prevalence
  • Data gathered to date
  • 392 informants interviewed (workers, employers,
    CBOs, unions, legal aid groups, policy advocates,
    governmental regulatory bodies, industry trade
    groups, service providers)
  • Variety of methods (one-on-one interviews, focus
    groups, blitzes)
  • Secondary data industry and business press,
    newspapers, academic articles, Census data, FOIA
    data from regulatory agencies

5
Some key workplace violations
  • Failure to pay minimum wage/prevailing wage
  • Failure to pay overtime, and forced off-the-clock
    work
  • Not allowing required breaks
  • Failure to pay at all
  • Failure to pay UI and social security taxes on
    cash wages
  • Taking illegal deductions
  • Violation of health safety standards
  • Failure to provide training on equipment and safe
    work practices
  • Failure to carry Workers Comp, and to pay it
    when claimed
  • Retaliation against workers filing claims
  • Retaliation against organizing
  • Discrimination in hiring, promotion, firing
  • Failure to comply with FMLA provisions

6
(No Transcript)
7
Worker mobility
  • Weve found a considerable amount of structure in
    how workers move between unregulated jobs
  • Strong industry- and occupation-based
    segmentation, with similar dynamics to U.S.
    workforce as a whole (e.g. initial job churning,
    followed by growing tenure in one job type over
    time)
  • Pervasive segmentation based on gender, race, and
    ethnicity
  • A variety of labor market intermediaries that
    channel worker flows
  • Less evidence of jumps to better paid,
    regulated jobs

8
How prevalent are violations?
  • Very little representative data
  • A few DOL establishment surveys in specific
    industries (i.e. random garment sweatshop or
    nursing home inspections)
  • Data on actual DOL violation cases are not useful
    for estimation, because of low capture rates
  • CPS/Census doubtful
  • More common
  • Day laborer surveys (random samples of corners)
  • Convenience sample surveys of immigrant workers
    in specific cities
  • Qualitative interview data

9
Methods of regulatory avoidance
  • In-house externalization (restaurants, grocery
    stores)
  • Subcontracting/temping out for work conducted
    on-site (janitorial firms)
  • Subcontracting for work offsite (industrial
    laundries)
  • Misclassification of workers as independent
    contractors (day laborers, taxi drivers)
  • Trafficking/forced labor (laborers smuggled to US
    to work in restaurants without pay)

10
Explanations 1 Demand-side factors
  • Trade-sensitive industries Global competition
    puts extreme pressure on US wage floor, e.g.
    garment industry sweatshops
  • Domestic industries Economic restructuring is
    putting increasing pressure on labor costs in
    low-wage industries (e.g. industry consolidation,
    deregulation, deunionization, Wall Street,
    Wal-Mart)
  • Semi-public industries Failure of state to
    adequately fund public goods (home health care,
    child care) creates gray markets of unregulated
    caregivers
  • Local demand for unregulated goods and services
    Growing labor force with very low wages needs
    super cheap goods and services, which in turn
    creates more unregulated jobs (e.g. ethnic
    retail, dollar vans).

11
Explanations 2 The role of supply, government
regulation and labor market institutions
  • Immigration
  • But government policy has been critical in
    shaping both the size and legal status (and
    therefore vulnerability) of immigrant workers in
    the US labor market.
  • Other laws and labor market institutions
  • Weak enforcement of workplace regulations both
    in terms of resources and in terms of the will to
    enforce
  • Decline of unions a critical labor market
    institution that has historically helped to
    enforce workplace standards
  • Declining workplace standards for example, the
    fall of the minimum wage has created strong
    incentives for subcontracting

12
State local solutions
  • Legislation
  • Broadening who can enforce (unions, CBOs)
  • Protecting workers who bring complaints
    (anti-retaliation)
  • Imposing more substantial penalties
  • Preventing misclassification of independent
    contractors
  • Responsible licensing/contractor laws
  • Strengthening existing enforcement
  • Resources for DOLs and legal services
  • Administrative will
  • Creating new enforcement models
  • Public-private collaborations
  • Sectoral initiatives
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com