Monitoring Health by Detecting Drifts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Monitoring Health by Detecting Drifts

Description:

seen for a short period of time when drift type changes ... Lifestyle Trends and patterns of inhabitants would be analyzed over period of time. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: vikramadi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Monitoring Health by Detecting Drifts


1
  • Monitoring Health by Detecting Drifts
  • and Outliers for a Smart Environment
  • Inhabitant
  • Gaurav Jain, Diane J. Cook, Vikramaditya Jakkula

2
MavHome
  • UTA Project Unique
  • Focus on entire home
  • House perceives and acts
  • Sensors
  • Controllers for devices
  • Connections to the mobile user and Internet
  • Unified project incorporating varied AI
    techniques, cross disciplinary with mobile
    computing, databases, multimedia, and others

3
MavHome
  • Goals
  • The goals of an intelligent environment control
    system should be to
  • 1. Maximize the safety and security of the
    inhabitant(s)
  • 2. Maximize the comfort of the inhabitant(s) by
    automating their environment the fullest and most
    desirable extent possible
  • 3. Minimize the consumption of natural
    resources in an effort to reduce costs and
    maximize environment efficiency.

4
Environment
  • MavHome Environment
  • MavDen
  • MavKitchen
  • MavPad

5
Environment-Contd
6
Overview
7
Core Technologies
  • Minimal Sequential Patterns Using ED
  • Given an input stream S of event occurrences
    O, ED
  • 1. Partitions S into Maximal Episodes, Pmax.
  • 2. Creates Itemsets, I, from the Maximal
    Episodes.
  • 3. Creates a Candidate Significant Episode, C,
    for each
  • Itemset I, and computes one or more
    Significance
  • Values, V, for each Candidate.
  • 4. Identifies Significant Episodes by evaluating
    the
  • Significance Values of the candidates.

8
Core Technologies
  • Decision Making using ProPHeT
  • ProPHeT is the main controlling component of the
    system
  • It uses data filtered through Episode Discovery
    (ED) to create a Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model
    (HHMM).
  • HHMM represents a user model that includes all
    of the episodes (e.g., entering a room, watching
    TV, sitting in a chair and listening to music,
    and so forth) that a person performs in the
    environment.

9
Core Technologies
10
Need for Health Monitoring
Problem Elderly, disabilities and the chronic ill
need health care. Personal preference Increased
care cost Inadequate infrastructure Solution Low-
cost automated health monitoring system at
home Lanspery Hyde state For most of us, the
word home evokes powerful emotions and is a
refuge
11
Drift Detection Algorithm
  • Diurnal algorithm
  • Uses autocorrelation plots
  • Three Steps
  • Update history
  • Detect drifts
  • Report Generation
  • Input history h, frequency sets, action list and
    their criticalities
  • OutFile report file
  • update h with the frequency sets
  • for each action a loop
  • find the drift type d in action as history
  • send the drift d for action a to the report
    manager
  • the report manager generates the final report
    based on the criticality of each action, the
    current drift parameters and previous drift
    parameters.

12
Update History
  • Maintains six-hourly, daily, weekly history
    queues.
  • Input is four six-hourly frequency sets.
  • Different window sizes are posible
  • Large window vs. small window

13
Detecting Drifts
  • Input action a, history h, reporter r
  • OutFile drift type d and its parameters p
  • check if action a has drift type d no drift
  • if yes then
  • send the drift type and its parameters to the
    reporter
  • return to the calling function
  • check if action a has drift type d cyclic or
    increasing
  • if yes then
  • send the drift type and its parameters to the
    reporter
  • return to the calling function
  • send the drift type as chaotic to the reporter

14
Test for no-drift
  • No-drift?
  • constant for a significant period of time, and
  • may have random noise.
  • Only the top half of the autocorrelation plot is
    used. Why?
  • Test
  • autocorrelation plot values lt threshold. Why?
  • Less than 10 of these values should lie outside
    the (m 2s, m 2s) range. Why?

15
Test for Cyclic
  • cyclic trend shows high upward peaks in
    autocorrelation graph

16
Test for Sloping
  • High degree of autocorrelation is between
    adjacent and near-adjacent observations.
  • High value at lag one
  • Value decreases with increase in lag
  • Slope length is the smallest lag at which the
    values stops decreasing.
  • Note Random noise is suppressed by the
    autocorrelation plot

17
Test for Chaotic
  • No test for chaotic
  • Anything not yet classified ends up any chaotic
  • Causes
  • large number of irregular changes
  • heavy non-random noise in data in all the windows
  • sudden large changes in the distribution
  • seen for a short period of time when drift type
    changes
  • Reporting of drifts will be discussed after
    presentation of the outlier detection algorithms

18
Outlier Detection Algorithms
  • Two types of outliers
  • Extremely high or low value in periodic frequency
  • Occurrence unexpected action in an ordered
    sequence of actions.
  • Separate algorithms for each
  • Autocorrelation-based outlier detection
  • Uses drift detection method
  • Outlier if last data point lies outside (m 3s,
    m 3s),
  • Tested for all window sizes.
  • If found outlier, then drift detection is not
    done.
  • Prediction-based outlier detection
  • Why a two methods?

19
Prediction-based Outlier Detection
  • Live-monitoring method
  • Uses Active LeZi (ALZ) 2 to find the expected
    pattern in the data.
  • ALZ uses data compression to predict the next
    action in a sequence. It determines the
    probability distribution for each action at any
    point of time.
  • When an action occurs this probability
    distribution is used to determine if the action
    is an outlier or not.

20
Prediction-based Outlier Detection
  • To determine if an action x is an outlier we
    calculate the anomaly measure n(x).
  • Two methods are used to calculate anomaly
    measure. Why?
  • To determine the importance an outlier we
    calculate the urgency factor u(x)

urgency factor, u (x) n(x) c(x) report if u
(x) gt 0.1
21
Report generation for Autocorrelation-based
algorithms
  • Which drift or outlier is important to report?
  • Uses
  • current classification,
  • the previous classification,
  • the criticality of the action, and
  • other parameters (confidence, length of drifts
    etc.)
  • Three levels
  • Level one Critical drifts and outliers
  • Level two Important drifts and outliers
  • Level three All drifts and outliers

22
Report generation
  • Level one
  • If action criticality is above medium, and either
    the classification changed from the previous or
    cycle period changes.
  • Level Two
  • All outliers
  • criticality is above medium
  • Previous classification changes
  • cycle period changes
  • confidence changes by some amount
  • Level three
  • Classification of each action.

23
Experiments
  • HMS was tested using both synthetic and real data
    (activity and health).
  • Five sets
  • Synthetic set one
  • Synthetic set two
  • Real set one
  • Real set two
  • Health set
  • Step1 verify algorithms using synthetic sets
  • Step 2 analyze how the algorithm work on real
    and health sets

24
Nature of data
Synthetic set one
  • Synthetic set one
  • To test autocorrelation-based algorithm
  • Hundred days nine action
  • 10639 data points
  • Random criticalities
  • Synthetic set two
  • To test prediction-based algorithm
  • 100 data points
  • Four actions

25
Nature of data
  • Real data
  • Activity data from MavPad
  • Seven weeks
  • Real set one tested on prediction-based
    algorithm
  • Electrical outlets usage, light usage and
    overhead fan usage.
  • 2163 data points 79 actions
  • Real set two tested on autocorrelation-based
    algorithm
  • Real set one data plus motion sensor data
  • 334935 data points 157 actions
  • Health Data tested on autocorrelation-based
    algorithm
  • Systolic, diastolic and hear rate are taken as
    action
  • 2 months one value each per day
  • each action is associated with its value instead
    of frequency
  • Most missing values were added manually

26
Experiments using Autocorrelation-based method
  • For Health Data
  • sensitive to sudden large changes
  • could detect drifts due to long term trends even
    with small amounts of noise.

27
Figure Line graph for graph confidence
diastolic vs. number of days for health set.
Figure Line graph for graph confidence heart
rate vs. number of days for health set.
28
Reminder Assistance System
  • Automation assistance is beneficial when
    activities are difficult to perform.
  • Such reminder service would benefit individuals
    suffering from dementia.
  • Reminders Triggered in two situations
  • when user queries for next routine activity
  • Critical anomaly is detected.

29
Conclusion
  • HMS help us gain information about different
    types of drifts and outliers that are part of the
    inhabitants lifestyle.
  • Detect anomalies in inhabitants health.
  • Gives information about sudden changes observed
    in inhabitants health.
  • Successful demonstration of MavHome software
    Architecture can monitor and provide automated
    assistance for inhabitants.

30
Future Work
We are currently collecting health-specific data
in the MavHome sites. We will be testing in the
living environments of recruited residents at the
C.C. Young Retirement Community in Dallas,
Texas. Lifestyle Trends and patterns of
inhabitants would be analyzed over period of
time.
31
  • Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com