Formal vs Informal Finance: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Formal vs Informal Finance:

Description:

1 if has a loan and put in a collateral = 0 if has a loan, no ... The dummy captures the intersection of 'requirement' for and 'ability' to put in a collateral ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: siteresour8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Formal vs Informal Finance:


1
  • Formal vs Informal Finance
  • Evidence from China
  • by
  • Meghana Ayyagari, Asli Demirgus-Kunt, Vojislav
    Maksimovic
  • Discussant
  • Bernard Yeung
  • Stern
  • Mar 2007

2
Interesting and important paper
  • First point
  • Chinas use of informal financing is just as
    extensive as other developing countries, e.g.,
    Brazil, Africa, East European countries, Africa,
    South Asian

3
Interesting and important paper
  • Second point among all firms (2002 data), or
    just private firms (not SOE, listed firms)
  • Having bank financing is
  • positively and significantly associated with
    sales growth, percent profits reinvested, and,
  • not related with productivity
  • Self-financing (informal, family, other) is
  • Not related with sales growth,
  • Possibly negative related to reinvestment
  • Positively and significantly associated with
    productivity growth
  • Productivity is (sales total material costs)/L
  • Control for
  • Endogeneity in treatment effects
  • City, size, firm type, age, competition
  • Contribution Use large scale data to show that
    formal (bank) financing helps growth and
    reinvestment

4
Comment on endogeneity
  • Correlation between getting loans and future
    profitability, a classic problem
  • Use a treatment effects model, Heckman correction
    (Inverse Mills Ratio)

5
Endogeneity
  • Need an instrument to predict getting bank loans
    but not correlated with future performance
  • Collateral dummy as
  • 1 if has a loan and put in a collateral
  • 0 if has a loan, no collateral requirement,
  • no loan because cant put in a
    collateral,
  • do not apply for a loan b/c no
    collateral.
  • The dummy captures the intersection of
    requirement for and ability to put in a
    collateral
  • Logic
  • Collateral serves as a proxy for the firms
    ability to post collateral. (so, can get a bank
    loan).
  • Whether there was a collateral requirement or not
    is less likely to be correlated with firms
    growth and hence need not enter the 2nd stage.
    Thus collateral serves as the identifying
    variable in our selection equation.
  • Curiosity
  • That some are granted a bank loan but not
    required a collateral are possibly due to their
    expected future performance
  • But would that not make a part of the dummy
    correlated with future performance?
  • Feel weird to use ex post variable to as an ex
    ante predictor, but not very successful to
    pinning down what is wrong
  • Why not use tangibility as an instrument?

6
Why the research is important?
  • Does finance matter?
  • Certainly
  • With finance, growth, no doubt
  • Why interested? Allocation efficiency is the key
  • Reinterpret
  • With bank loan, experiences sales growth,
    reinvest more, but, VA/L does not increase!
  • Meaning?
  • Self-financing, experiences little sales growth,
    little increase in reinvestment, but VA/L grows!
  • Meaning?
  • Efficient/Inefficient formal external financing?!

7
Why banks are inefficient?
  • Corporate governance
  • Who own banks?
  • Managers are by political appointment
  • Lack of prudent judiciary duties
  • Connected lending (short termism in the G)
  • Opaque system
  • ? corruption, NPL
  • Poor internal corporate governance
  • Credit officers want to lend!
  • My promotion vs. protecting other peoples money
  • Bank monitoring of borrower?
  • Go hard face against connections

8
Push
  • Examine the efficiency of the system
  • Dig into the regions and cities and ask where
    bank lending leads to better results?
  • Link the efficiency of bank financing with a
    region/citys institutional environment?
  • Quality of the government
  • Quality of the regulations and supervision?
  • Quality of bank executives?
  • Banks credit policies equity requirement,
    credit reports, etc
  • Loan officers incentive/agency problem?

9
Still puzzled
  • Recall the first point
  • Chinas use of informal financing is just as
    extensive as other developing countries, e.g.,
    Brazil, Africa, East European countries, Africa,
    South Asian
  • But, efficiency?
  • Raise the puzzle why is China growing so fast
    even with its lousy capital markets?
  • Higher savings?
  • Chinas capital allocation is a bit more
    efficient, at least in some major cities?
  • Using location level variables to shed light?

10
Conclude
  • Interesting paper leading to interesting questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com