Governance and Stewardship of National Health Research Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Governance and Stewardship of National Health Research Systems

Description:

Questions on policies, legislation, plans, coordination mechanisms, etc. ... Three quarters of those without an existing health research policy expressed ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: ISS282
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Governance and Stewardship of National Health Research Systems


1
Governance and Stewardship of National Health
Research Systems
  • Analysis and synthesis of survey results
  • Dr Erica Gadsby

2
Stewardship knowing where you are going,
monitoring progress, and getting there safely
3
Methods
  • National level survey
  • Questions on policies, legislation, plans,
    coordination mechanisms, etc.
  • Responses from 43 countries
  • Institutional level survey
  • Mod 1000 questions on institutions history,
    sector, operational level, functions, leadership,
    etc.
  • Mod 2000 questions on institutions types and
    approaches to research, their scientific review
    policies criteria, monitoring evaluation, and
    collaboration.
  • Responses from up to 825 institutions in 44
    countries

4
Analysis and limitations
  • Basic descriptive and comparative analysis using
    SPSS.
  • Analysis complicated/limited because
  • Data entered as string rather than numeric
    variables, and not disaggregated
  • Numerous gaps in the data (particularly in
    national survey)
  • Questionnaire sometimes answered incorrectly
    (missed skip patterns, etc.)

5
Stewardship and the health research system
Priorities
Vision
Ethical standards
Monitoring evaluation
6
Articulating a vision for health research
Three quarters of those without an existing
health research policy expressed interest in
developing one this indicates a lack of
capacity, rather than willingness!
7
Prioritising health research
8
Ethical standards
35 of countries have hospitals with ERCs to
review all clinical research proposals 22 of
institutions have written criteria for scientific
review of proposals that address ethical review
9
Monitoring and evaluating the NHRS
43 of institutions have explicit or written
requirement for the institution to undergo
independent evaluation 29 of institutions have
SRC that meets regularly
10
A rich and varied research culture
11
Conclusions
  • In many countries, there is no formal,
    articulated vision for health research
    policies, plans and strategies are frequently
    either absent or out of date.
  • Absence of official health research policies in
    many countries means most will not have
    identified health research priorities.
    Stakeholder collaboration in policy development
    is rare.
  • The setting and monitoring of ethical standards
    appears to be a woefully neglected function.
  • Monitoring and evaluation is also neglected, both
    at country level and institutional level.
  • The broad range types of research institutions,
    and of the research activities they contribute
    to, shows a good basis for the strengthening of
    research capacity in the African region.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com