Title: Governance and Stewardship of National Health Research Systems
1Governance and Stewardship of National Health
Research Systems
- Analysis and synthesis of survey results
- Dr Erica Gadsby
2Stewardship knowing where you are going,
monitoring progress, and getting there safely
3Methods
- National level survey
- Questions on policies, legislation, plans,
coordination mechanisms, etc. - Responses from 43 countries
- Institutional level survey
- Mod 1000 questions on institutions history,
sector, operational level, functions, leadership,
etc. - Mod 2000 questions on institutions types and
approaches to research, their scientific review
policies criteria, monitoring evaluation, and
collaboration. - Responses from up to 825 institutions in 44
countries
4Analysis and limitations
- Basic descriptive and comparative analysis using
SPSS. - Analysis complicated/limited because
- Data entered as string rather than numeric
variables, and not disaggregated - Numerous gaps in the data (particularly in
national survey) - Questionnaire sometimes answered incorrectly
(missed skip patterns, etc.)
5Stewardship and the health research system
Priorities
Vision
Ethical standards
Monitoring evaluation
6Articulating a vision for health research
Three quarters of those without an existing
health research policy expressed interest in
developing one this indicates a lack of
capacity, rather than willingness!
7Prioritising health research
8Ethical standards
35 of countries have hospitals with ERCs to
review all clinical research proposals 22 of
institutions have written criteria for scientific
review of proposals that address ethical review
9Monitoring and evaluating the NHRS
43 of institutions have explicit or written
requirement for the institution to undergo
independent evaluation 29 of institutions have
SRC that meets regularly
10A rich and varied research culture
11Conclusions
- In many countries, there is no formal,
articulated vision for health research
policies, plans and strategies are frequently
either absent or out of date. - Absence of official health research policies in
many countries means most will not have
identified health research priorities.
Stakeholder collaboration in policy development
is rare. - The setting and monitoring of ethical standards
appears to be a woefully neglected function. - Monitoring and evaluation is also neglected, both
at country level and institutional level. - The broad range types of research institutions,
and of the research activities they contribute
to, shows a good basis for the strengthening of
research capacity in the African region.