Broadband/LLU RAG for January 2006 tom.saville@bt.com

1 / 2
About This Presentation
Title:

Broadband/LLU RAG for January 2006 tom.saville@bt.com

Description:

ISPs struggling for resource to manage both day to day and 21CN ... Other WG RAG status influences will be: Cost, Quality & Customer Satisfaction ... –

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 3
Provided by: British66
Category:
Tags: llu | rag | broadband | com | january | saville | tom

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Broadband/LLU RAG for January 2006 tom.saville@bt.com


1
Broadband/LLU RAG for January 2006tom.saville_at_bt
.com
  • RAG Status RED
  • Key Issues
  • ISPs struggling for resource to manage both day
    to day and 21CN
  • FAS/NGB product now potentially in delay
    following addition of new requirements on the
    21CN product set
  • IPstream requirements capture in delay
  • Lack of commercial principles is a major issue
    for Industry as try to make decisions on future
    suppliers and products.
  • Migration issues are now surfacing and Industry
    are concerned.
  • For NGN Broadband, there is a requirement to
    meet shared economies of scale for all ISPs
    across areas of economic bottleneck.

Key Milestones December / January Achievements
BB/LLU WG held on 10 January 2006. 28
attendees. Main input was on Implementation and
Migration plus Testing. Presentations well
received. Work commenced at the meeting on NGN
Broadband Requirements. January / February Work
Plan Continue with requirements and specification
of NGN Broadband. Continue with detailed
discussions on migration of existing
products Industry to input on suggested pricing
methodologies
Time
Cost
Quality
Customer Satisfaction
Information
Status
2
WG Issues RAGs
  • Working Group Issues are defined as problems that
    are within the WG scope and will impede the
    progress of the WG and cannot be totally
    resolved, without delaying known milestones, by
    the WG without outside help.
  • The outside help will be triggered by a formal
    escalation. Any WG that has one or more
    escalations currently flagged will be deemed to
    be in status Red (shown against time indicator).
    If an issue has the potential to delay a key
    milestone it should raise an Amber status flag,
    but no formal escalation will be raised. Once the
    escalation has been dealt with and appropriate
    guidance given the escalation will be closed and
    the WG status will revert.
  • Other WG RAG status influences will be Cost,
    Quality Customer Satisfaction Information, as
    in table below.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com