Title: Welfare Reform Interventions: Employment Outcomes, 199003
1Welfare Reform Interventions Employment
Outcomes, 1990-03
- Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies
Social-Structural Characteristics, Rather Than
Personal Ones, Ought To Be The Focus of Welfare
Policies
2Introduction
- Historical and Theoretical Contexts
- 20th Century Social Welfare Policy Developments
Recent Reforms
3Recent Historical Context
- Early to Mid-1990s
- Consistent with conservative political agendas
- Problem Guaranteed incomes act as a significant
work disincentive. - Solution Policy reforms ought to focus on
shaping the behaviors of individuals.
4Distal Historical Context
- 1930s 1960s Economic social upheaval
- Consistent with liberal political agendas
- Problem Social, political and economic forces
cause cycles of joblessness. - Solution Governments ought to respond to the
resultant human suffering. Policies ought to
focus on shaping the structures of society.
5Diametrically Opposed Political Theories Which
is Valid?
- Conservative Theory
- Welfare benefits (dependence) cause labor market
withdrawal (joblessness). - Liberal Theory
- Joblessness causes welfare use (and dependence,
if the primarily social determinants
persist).
6What of Social Science Theory?
- The Bell Curve
- Welfare dependence and related social problems
are caused by personal, genetic, even racial
factors. - The Skewed Curve
- Welfare determinants are related to the
inequitable distributions of opportunities (e.g.,
education, jobs). -
FOR MORE INFO...
Herrnstein, R. J., Murray, C. (1994). The bell
curve. Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work
disappears. (1987). The truly disadvantaged.
7Meta-Analytic Test of Theories
- Joblessness ? Welfare
- Joblessness Fertility
- or Welfare OOW Births
- Teen pregnancy
- Sole female HH
- Joblessness accounted for 25-fold more
variability than did the availability and
generosity of welfare benefits. -
8Research Questions Another Meta-Analytic Test of
Theories
- How important has the availability of jobs been
in determining the success of various welfare
reform interventions? - Success facilitating the movement of people
from welfare to work
9Method Study Selection
- - Studies of any specific welfare reform policy
intervention (AFDC/TANF) - - Employment outcomes
- - 1990 to the present
- - Published and unpublished
- - United States and Canada
- - Randomized and quasi-experiments
- - Power to detect a 5 difference
- - 47 studies for meta-analysis
10Augmentation of Meta-Database
- Each study sample was joined with its
corresponding area unemployment rate. - - US Dept. Labor, Statistics Canada
- - Seasonally-adjusted average quarterly rate over
study follow-up periods - - Rates calculated according to each studys
sampling frame by states, counties or
metropolitan areas
11Analytic Methods
- Comparison of intervention and control/comparison
groups on adjusted employment rates -
- - Employment rates adjusted for study samples
(Mantel-Haenszel) - - Predictors of rate differences identified with
regression models
12Meta-Analytic Hypotheses
- Social-structural characteristics will
significantly predict program success. - 1. The availability of jobs in study areas will
be significantly associated with the success of
welfare reform interventions. - 2. The programmatic availability of child care
will be significantly associated with the success
of welfare interventions.
13Meta-Analytic Main Effect
- Overall weighted (by sample size) effect of
specific welfare reform interventions - Aggregate Across-Study Employment rate
- Intervention group 51
- Control/comp. gp. 47
- Rate difference 4
14Moderators of the Main Effect
- Available jobs in areas and programmatic
availability of child care were both
significantly associated with study employment
rate differences (intervention vs. control/comp.
groups). - Adjusted rate differences
- Jobs 18
- Child care 25
-
15Conclusion
- The availability of jobs ought to be emphasized
as we reconsider welfare policies.
16Politically Liberal Welfare Assumptions Better
Fit Reality
- This studys findings (along with he
preponderance of historical social scientific
evidence) support the notion that
social-structural characteristics such as the
lack of good jobs are far weightier explanations
for welfare dependence and labor market
withdrawal, as well as for most purported
welfare problems, than are personal-behavioral
ones. -
17Policy Implications in Diametric Opposition to
Political Realities
- Human capital and economic developmental
approaches, rather than personally punitive
approaches are needed. - Making good jobs available to all will require
integrated multi-level social policies not
merely welfare policies per se, but also
economic, education, and health care policies.
18Policy Implications in Diametric Opposition to
Political Realities
- Policy makers, however, seem headed down the
road most traveled. - For example Congress will probably fully
reauthorization TANF during the coming year. - - Freeze TANF benefits
- - Increase work requirements
- - Diminish supports such as child care
- - Restrict education/training programs
19Future Research and Advocacy
- Ample sound evidence exists for the rationale
steerage of future social welfare policies. - Effective advocacy will be required to ensure
that such decisions are not based on the mere ebb
and flow of political tides.