FollowUp Courses for Study Abroad Returnees: PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 16
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FollowUp Courses for Study Abroad Returnees:


1
Follow-Up Courses for Study Abroad Returnees
  • Problems and Possibilities
  • CIEE 2004

2
Presenters
  • Elaine Meyer-Lee, Saint Marys College
  • Margit Johnson, Carleton College
  • Greg Downey, University of Notre Dame
  • All of you!

3
Why such courses?
  • Much effort has gone into study abroad programs,
    often with impressive results
  • Historically support for re-entry was
    extracurricular programming aimed at alleviating
    reverse culture shock
  • Growing awareness of the additional need for
    academic contexts to consolidate and integrate
    learning
  • Also, an additional venue for assessment

4
Why this session?
  • While the overarching goals of such courses may
    be similar, faculty are now approaching this
    relatively uncharted terrain from various
    disciplines and pedagogical strategies
  • Many institutions are interested in implementing
    such courses and much is to be gained from
    pooling experiences of problems possibilities
  • A key part of Closing the circle Creating an
    enduring international experience

5
Your turn
  • Additional ideas for such courses (other
    theoretical frameworks or assessments, other
    exercises, readings, etc.)
  • Open Questions and answers
  • Small groups on how some ideas might be applied
    in your context
  • Last thoughts or questions

6
Saint Marys College
  • ICS 490 Analysis of Study Abroad Learning
  • Elaine Meyer-Lee

7
Main Objectives
  • Articulating impact of sojourn through
    reflection, exercises, writing
  • Qualitative analysis of this writing
  • Quantitative self-assessment
  • Review of existing theory research
  • Bringing our data into dialogue
  • Making connections with intercultural relating
    here, broader education, career plans

8
Articulating the impact
  • Much reflective writing (moved to 3 credits this
    fall)
  • Mini-poetry workshop
  • Partner interviews
  • Preliminary theorizing
  • Sharing as part of pre-departure
  • Final reflection on additional impact of course

9
Qualitative Analyses/Interpretation
  • for content on effects
  • overall themes and differences
  • program-specific sources of variation such as
    length, country, language, model
  • person-specific sources such as previous
    experience, college, affective reaction
  • Specific to US students, or to abroad

10
Quantitative Assessment/Theory
  • Identity Development (Erikson, Marcia, Phinney
    Phinneys Multi-Ethic Identity Measure, as US
    retrospective)
  • Experiential Learning (J. Bennett, Kolb Kolbs
    Learning Style Inventory)
  • Intellectual/Intercultural Development (Perry, M.
    Bennett Bennetts Intercultural Development
    Inventory)

11
Dialogue with the literature
  • Reading Kauffmann review
  • Locating and reading recent articles
  • Comparing our data with theirs (for example, more
    focus on personal)
  • Bringing our data into conversation with existing
    theories both using theory to illuminate, but
    also using data to challenge or build

12
Connections with domestic intercultural relating
  • Individual forays into cultural contexts where
    theyd be in minority (Latino church, Mosque,
    community meeting in predominantly
    African-American neighborhood)
  • Reflecting on experience how was it like and
    unlike study abroad? How was it like and unlike
    similar experiences before studying abroad?
  • Huge challenge

13
Connections to broader education at SMC, career
plans
  • Experiential vs. traditional
  • More independent pedagogy
  • Pace and quantity more intense
  • Tendency to passively revert

14
More Pedagogical Problems
  • Logistical/Institution Specific? timing and
    credit issues, limited research background
  • Some overall resistance to tainting memories
    with academic analysis
  • You cant articulate what you havent learned
    (more pre and during)
  • Resistance to IDI/limitations of quantitative
    measures

15
Research Possibilities
  • Excellent opportunity for extensive qualitative
    data gathering to help interpret quantitative
    program evaluation and documentation of study
    abroad learning outcomes
  • Downside a self-selected focus group, may still
    want random, too

16
Pooling Resources
  • www.saintmarys.edu/cwil/php/intercultural.learnin
    g/reentry.course.resources.php
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com