New Design - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

New Design

Description:

Tet Pancake Flipping. pBad Pancake Flipping. Hin-mediated Flipping (1) 2 (-1) 2 (1) 2 Hin ... Observed Tet Resistance. in pSB1A7 (1) 2 - (-1) 2 1 (2) - 1 (-2) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: samantha96
Category:
Tags: design | new | tet

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: New Design


1
Parts Table from MWSU
2
Modeling Random Pancake Flipping
Change the words
3
Modeling 8 Stacks of 2 Pancakes
( 1 2) (-1 2) ( 1 -2) (-1 -2)
( 2 1) (-2 1) ( 2 -1) (-2 -1)
4
Modeling 8 Stacks of 2 Pancakes
Solution is (1, 2) or (-2, -1)
  • ( 1, 2)
  • (-2, -1)

( 1, -2) (-1, 2) (-2, 1) ( 2, -1)
(-1, -2) ( 2, 1)
5
Modeling 8 Stacks of 2 Pancakes
Solution is (1, 2) or (-2, -1)
  • ( 1, 2)
  • (-2, -1)

( 1, -2) (-1, 2) (-2, 1) ( 2, -1)
(-1, -2) ( 2, 1)
6
Modeling 384 Stacks of 4 Pancakes
2n (n!) X Combinations 24 (4!) 384
Combinations
7
Modeling 384 Stacks of 4 Pancakes


Build one representative of each family




8
Define a Biological Pancake
Tet
Nonfunctional
RBS
RE
hixC
pBad
hixC
hixC
pancake 1
pancake 2
Tet
Functional
RBS
RE
pBad
hixC
hixC
hixC
pancake 1
pancake 2
9
One Pancake Constructs
PredictedTet Resistance
Observed Tet Resistance
(1) 2


(-1) 2
-

1 (2)


1 (-2)
-

10
Detect Flipping via Restriction Digest
NheI
NheI
ExpectedFragment Size
(1) 2
200 bp
(-1) 2
300 bp
1 (2)
200 bp
1 (-2)
1100 bp
11
Hin-mediated Flipping
Tet Pancake Flipping
pBad Pancake Flipping
1 (2) Hin
(1) 2 Hin
1 (-2)
(-1) 2
1 (2)
(1) 2
12
Read-Through Blocked by pSB1A7
Observed Tet Resistancein pSB1A3 (1) 2
(-1) 2 1 (2) 1 (-2)
13
Read-Through Blocked by pSB1A7
Observed Tet Resistancein pSB1A3 (1) 2
(-1) 2 1 (2) 1 (-2)
Observed Tet Resistancein pSB1A7 (1) 2 -
(-1) 2 1 (2) - 1 (-2)
14
Original Design Problems
15
Original Design Problems
16
Original Design Problems
17
Two-Plasmid Solution
  • 1 Two pancakes (Amp vector)
  • 2 AraC/Hin generator (Kan vector)

Tet
RBS
pSB1A7
hixC
hixC
hixC
pBad
AraC PC
Hin LVA
RBS
pSB1K3
pLac
18
Biological Equivalence Problem
(1,2)
LB Amp Kan Tet
(-2,-1)
19
Biological Equivalence Solution
(1,2)
(1,2)
LB Amp Kan Tet
(-2,-1)
(-2,-1)
20
Eight Two-Pancake Stacks
(2,1)
(1,2)
(2,-1)
(1,-2)
(-1,2)
(-2,1)
(-1,-2)
(-2,-1)
21
Results
22
CONCLUSIONSConsequences of DNA Flipping Devices
-1,2 ? -2,-1 in 2 flips!
PRACTICAL Proof-of-concept for bacterial
computers Data storage n units gives 2n(n!)
combinations BASIC BIOLOGY RESEARCH Improved
transgenes in vivo Evolutionary insights
23
Next Steps
Better control of kinetics Slow down Hin
activity Determine x flip seconds-1 Size
bias? Improved insulating vector Accepts
B0015 double terminator Bigger pancake
stacks
Number of flips vs.Time?
Number of flips
Time
24
Summary What We Learned
Multiple campuses increase capacity with
parallel processing Collective
Troubleshooting Size does not matter (College
vs. University)
25
Summary What We Learned
Math and Biology mesh really well Math
modelingWe proved a new theorem! Challenges of
biological components
26
But above all
We had a flippin good time!!!
27
Extra Slides gtgtgt
28
Modeling Random Flipping
for trial 1 to n trials stack
input_stack flips 0 while stack
1k flips flips 1 int choose_random_interv
al stack stack(1(int(1)-1)) -1
fliplr(stack(int(1)int(2)))
stack(int(2)1k) end end
29
Flip length 1
Flip length 2
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
Modeling 384 Stacks of 4 Pancakes
10 combinations 1 flip from solution 10 chance
33
Effect of Plasmid Copy Number
Change the words
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com