Free Energy Change Calculation of Mutations on TetRTetO System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Free Energy Change Calculation of Mutations on TetRTetO System

Description:

The Tet repressor protein(TetR) regulates transcription of a family of ... In the absence of inducer, TetR dimers bind to the operators TetO1 and TetO2, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: dryiannis
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Free Energy Change Calculation of Mutations on TetRTetO System


1
Free Energy Change Calculation of Mutations on
TetR/TetO System
  • Yuhua Duan
  • Chemical Engineering Department
  • University of Minnesota

2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • TetR/TetO system
  • Free energy calculation methodology
  • Calculation procedure
  • Results
  • Conclusion

3
Introduction
  • The biological function of many proteins is
    triggered and modulated by binding of effector
    molecules or cofactors
  • Molecular recognition is a fundamental process in
    all living systems, regulating processes as
    diverse as transcription, cell signalling and
    immunity
  • Binding energy is the key to understand the
    thermodynamic and kinetic principles of protein
    binding on DNA in more detail.

4
Introduction TetR/TetO
  • The Tet repressor protein(TetR) regulates
    transcription of a family of tetracycline(tc)
    resistance determinants in Gram-negative
    bacteria
  • In the absence of inducer, TetR dimers bind to
    the operators TetO1 and TetO2, shutting down
    transcription of its own gene and the resistance
    gene.

5
TetR/TetO
From Orth, p. et al, Nature Structural biology,
7, 215(2000)
6
Binding Free energy explores mutation
  • We are interested in exploring the binding free
    energy change due to the mutation on TetO.
  • Explore how conformation change due to mutation
    results in the bind free energy change between
    TetR and TetO.
  • Find the mechanism of binding change due to
    mutation to affect the regulation.

7
Our Free energy change calculation scheme
  • The free energy change for a biological system
    can be divided into several terms
  • ?G ?Ges ?G cav ?Gvdw ?Gbinding
  • ?Gcoulomb ?G pol ?Gnonpol ?Gbinding

8
Free Energy Decomposition_?Gcoulumb
  • Electrostatic potential F(r)coulomb
  • Solve Poisson-Boltzmann equation
  • ?.e(r).??(r)-?02?(r)4p?int(r) 0
  • or non-linear eq.
  • ?.e(r).??(r)-?02?(r)1 ?(r)2/6 ?(r)4/120
    4p?int(r) 0
  • Generalized Born Theory(GB)

9
Free Energy Decomposition_ ?Gpol
  • Solute-solvent electrostatic polarization term
    ?Gpol can be calculated from GB model
  • where fGB(rij2aij2e-D)0.5
  • aij(aiaj)0.5
  • Drij2/(2aij)2
  • ai is the effective Born radius of atom i

10
Free energy decomposition_ ?Gpol
  • Salt concentration effects we can consider salt
    into GB model and get a modified ?Gpol
    form(Proteins, 55(2004)383)
  • where ? is the Debye-Huckel screening
    parameter.

11
Free Energy Decomposition_ ?Gbinding
  • Binding Energy ?Gbinding for Protein and DNA can
    be obtained by using self-consistent
    Lennard-Jones 12-6 parameters(A,B) which have
    been used in AMBER and CHARMM software with the
    form
  • For all different atom type, there are several
    different optimized parameter sets existed.

12
Free Energy Decomposition_ ?Gnonpol
  • We can calculate the solvent accessible surface
    area Ak for each residue and nucleotide(JMB,
    55(1971)379).
  • Desolvation energy for non-polarized part
  • For parameter sk of 20 amino acids, taking from
    Protein Sci. 4(1995)1402. ? for all case is
    7.2cal/mol(JACS, 112(1990)6127).

13
The free energy change for TetR/TetO binding
  • We are interested in the relative free energy
    change(??G) due to the mutation
  • The wild-type as our reference state to estimated
    the free-energy change(??G).

14
Wild-type TetR/TetO
  • The initial atomic coordinates of TetR/TetO from
    PDB with code 1QPI
  • Using Insight II to alignment the missed residues
    in 1QPI
  • The missed residues 2,3, 207 and 208 built from
    2TRT
  • For missed residues 156163, random generate a
    loop, then minimized them
  • The missed residue 1(Met) was added in.

15
Wild-type TetR/TetO
  • The TetO sequence are palindromic symmetry. In
    1QPI there are only 15 base pairs.
  • Using InsightII to append 2 more pairs on each
    DNA ends.

-9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5- A C T C T
A T C A T T G A T A G A G T
3 3- T G A G A T A G T A A C T
A T C T C A -5
16
The wild type of TetR/TetO
Na
TetO
TetR
17
Minimized Structure of TetR/TetO
  • Using CHARMM to build in all missing atoms for
    TetR/TetO system.
  • Add Na ions around the PO4- groups on DNA, the
    distance between P and Na is about 4.5Å
  • Solvent the TetR/TetO system into water (boxsize
    90x90x100) and add NaCl into the water layer
    randomly(concentration 0.15M).

18
The whole simulation system
Include TetR/TetO Salts Water
molecules Total number of atoms 80,000
19
Minimization of TetR/TetO
  • Fix all atoms of TetR/TetO except for the 4 added
    base pairs, minimization with Charmm to get TetO
    conformation right
  • Fix all backbone atoms of TetR/TetO, minimize the
    side chain conformations
  • Release all restrains and minimize the system to
    reach the equilibrium states.

20
Mutations
  • Take out the TetR/TetO from the whole system,
    using Insight II to mutate the base on TetO.
    Since the TetO is palindromic, mutation is done 2
    pairs at ?positions.
  • Solvent mutated TetR/TetO into water, add salts,
    do the minimization without constrain to
    equilibrium structure.

21
Free energy calculations
  • Calculate the free energy change for the mutated
    systems and the wild-type TetR/TetO.
  • Get the difference of each components of the ?G
    between the muated and wild-type TetR/TetO. Sum
    them togather to get the free energy change due
    to the mutation ??G.

22
Our Scheme
23
Results of TetR/TetO
24
Results of TetR/TetO
25
Results
  • The experimental relative affinities are
    presented by
  • derepression which is derived from
    ?-galactosidase activity.

26
Results
  • The relationship is not clear due to the
    experimential activity does not only depends on
    the binding.
  • Further work is needed to explore this
    relationship.

27
Conclusions
  • Our free energy change calculations show all
    mutations are unfavourable due the positive ??G,
    which are in agreement of the experimental
    predictions
  • The calculated ??G vs the experimental relative
    affinities are not coincidence. The reason could
    be the experimental activity are not only
    dependent on binding.

28
Further Work
  • Validation our method with other systems in which
    the experimental binding energy change due to
    mutation is known, such as ? repressor--DNA
    complexes
  • Study the specificity of repressor by mutation
    amino acid on TetR and TetO.

29
Acknowledgement
  • Dr. Yuk Sham, Dr. B.V.B. Reddy.
  • Supported by AHPCRC, DTC
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com