Last Time - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 186
About This Presentation
Title:

Last Time

Description:

Last Time. We use radar that is bounced off of other planets. We know the speed of light. We can measure the time it takes for the radar pulse to make a round trip ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 187
Provided by: RyanL
Category:
Tags: last | time

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Last Time


1
Last Time
  • We began to answer the question, How was the
    Universe created?
  • To answer this question, we first have to come to
    an understanding of what the Universe is

2
Last Time
  • One step towards doing this is to understand how
    big the Universe is
  • But measuring distances in space is notoriously
    difficult
  • There are no mile markers to help us

3
Last Time
  • Astronomers use the concept of the distance
    ladder to measure distances
  • Each rung on the distance ladder is a technique
    for measuring distances
  • Each rung only gets us far, and each rung is
    dependent on the ones below it

4
Last Time
  • An uncertainty in one rung propagates through the
    all other rungs
  • We need to be as accurate as possible

5
Last Time
  • The first rung on the distance ladder was the
    measurement of the Earth-Sun distance
  • We know the relative distances of all the planets
  • If we can measure the distance to other planets,
    we can determine the length of the AU

6
Last Time
  • We use radar that is bounced off of other planets
  • We know the speed of light
  • We can measure the time it takes for the radar
    pulse to make a round trip
  • We can calculate the distance to the planets

7
Last Time
  • Once we know the AU, we can use parallaxes to
    measure the distance to the stars
  • But we have to know the baseline (in this case, 2
    AU)

8
(No Transcript)
9
Last Time
  • Both of these methods are direct and very
    reliable
  • But parallax only works out to about 100
    light-years

10
Last Time
  • Next, we use main-sequence fitting
  • By using parallax, we can build an H-R diagram in
    terms of absolute magnitude

11
Last Time
  • We can then make an H-R diagram for stars that
    are all the same, though unknown distance
  • This will be in terms of apparent magnitude

12
Last Time
  • Then we just adjust the H-R diagram so and use
    the distance modulus to find the distance
  • This works out to about 300,000 light years

13
Last Time
14
Last Time
  • The next rung is to use Cepheid Variables
  • Cepheid variables are pulsing stars
  • The period of pulsation relates to their
    luminosity, so they are a type of standard candle

15
(No Transcript)
16
Last Time
  • Measuring period is easyjust watch the star
  • From period we can determine luminosity
  • We can measure flux, and with the flux and
    luminosity, we can calculate distance
  • But we must first calibrate using main sequence
    fitting

17
Last Time
  • This works out to about 13 million light years,
    but past this point Cepheids are too dim
  • Next, we use Type Ia supernovae
  • These, too, are standard candles, but they are
    much brighter
  • This gets us out to 1 billion light-years

18
Last Time
  • Light that traveled 1 billion light-years must
    have traveled for at least 1 billion years
  • The universe was a different place
  • Finding standard candles that we can calibrate is
    hard

19
Last Time
  • The next rung is the cosmological redshift

20
Last Time
  • Hubble realized that there was a link between the
    recession velocity of a galaxy and its distance

21
Last Time
  • This is Hubbles law
  • The current best estimate for H0 is 72 km/s/Mpc
  • Or, every 1 million parsecs, galaxies speed up by
    72 km/s

22
Last Time
  • Why are all the galaxies rushing apart?
  • Because the Universe is expanding!
  • Space-time itself is growing, and the galaxies
    are being taken along for the ride

23
Last Time
  • The cosmological redshift is just the stretching
    of lights wavelength due to this expanding
    Universe

24
Last Time
  • But the Universe is not expanding in small
    patches where the local gravity is strong enough
    to overcome the expansion

25
Last Time
  • Still, overall, the Universe is expanding
  • And the expansion is Universalit is the same
    everywhere

26
Last Time
  • If we follow the expanding Universe backwards in
    time, we come to the conclusion that the Universe
    must have been much smaller
  • Everything was much closer together

27
Last Time
  • In fact, everything in the Universe was contained
    in a singularity
  • For some reason, though, the Universe began to
    grow

28
Last Time
  • The explosion that caused our Universe to spring
    forth is called the Big Bang
  • Before the Big Bang, there was nothingno space
    and no time

29
Last Time
  • The Big Bang theory seems to claim quite a lot
  • Why are we so confident?
  • We traced the evolution of the Universe to answer
    this question

30
Last Time
  • The Big Bang makes predictions that we can test
  • One of these is that the Universe would have been
    very hot and energetic immediately after the Big
    Bang

31
Last Time
  • Strange particles were being created and then
    quickly decaying back into energy
  • But some particles, like protons, neutrons, and
    electrons, were stable

32
Last Time
  • 100 second A.B.B., the conditions would have been
    right for protons and neutrons to come together
    to make the first atomic nuclei

33
Last Time
  • We can predict the conditions during this time
    and from this predict the relative abundances of
    Hydrogen and Helium

34
Last Time
  • By 300 A.B.B., fusion would have stopped and we
    expect there to have been 75 Hydrogen, 25
    Helium, 0.01 Deuterium
  • This is what we observe!!!

35
Last Time
  • For the next 380,000 years, the Universe would
    still be very hot and electrons would not be able
    to combine with nuclei
  • This means light could not travel freely

36
Last Time
  • But after 380,000 years A.B.B., the Universe
    would have cooled enough for electrons to combine
    with nuclei, and light would be able to travel

37
Last Time
  • This radiation would be black body radiation and
    the peak wavelength would correspond to a
    temperature of 3000 Kelvin

38
Last Time
  • This light has been detected, but today it is
    redshifted, so that it appears to correspond to a
    2.725 Kelvin black body
  • This is known as the Cosmic Microwave Background

39
Last Time
  • We also discussed other observational signatures
    of the Big Bang that we will soon be able to see
  • The Dark Ages
  • The Epoch of Reionization

40
Last Time
  • Finally, we discussed the growth of large scale
    structure
  • The slight anisotropies in the CMB are a map of
    the density of the early Universe

41
Last Time
  • We can follow this density pattern as it changes
    with time
  • Do a computer simulation
  • See if it resembles our current Universe

42
The Growth of Structure
  • Lets do just that
  • Structure Growth
  • Another Example
  • The Millennium Simulation

43
This Time
  • Finish up the large scale structure of the
    Universe
  • Look at some problems with the Big Bang
  • Discuss the solution to those problemsInflation
  • Start talking about dark energy

44
The Large Scale Structure
  • Do these simulations match what we see?
  • Finding out is not easy
  • Requires us to know the distance to hundreds of
    thousands, even millions of galaxies
  • Need lots of redshifts

45
The Large Scale Structure
  • A few projects have done this
  • 2MASS
  • CfA Redshift Survey
  • Sloan Digital Sky Survey
  • 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey

46
2MASS
  • 2MASS stands for 2 Micron All Sky Survey
  • Map the entire sky at about 2 microns
  • Catalogued over 1 million galaxies

47
(No Transcript)
48
CfA Redshift Survey
  • Started in 1977 by the Center for Astrophysics
    (Harvard)
  • Completed 1982
  • Got redshifts out to about 700 million light years

49
(No Transcript)
50
CfA Redshift Survey
  • The second survey (1985-1995) got redshifts for
    about 18,000 bright galaxies
  • Saw out to about 600 million light-years

51
(No Transcript)
52
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey
  • Sloans goal is to map 25 of the sky
  • Located at Apache Point, NM
  • Uses advanced fiber-optic systems and a 120
    Megapixel CCD array
  • Out to 2 billion light-years
  • Goal is to observe 100 million objects
  • 200 GB a night

53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
2dFGS
  • Stands for 2 degree Field Galaxy Survey
  • A deep survey of a 1500 degrees2
  • Out to 600 million parsecs
  • 232,155 Galaxies in the catalog

56
(No Transcript)
57
Large Scale Structure
  • The answer to our question of Does observation
    match simulation? is an emphatic yes
  • For these, and other reasons, we can say with
    great confidence that the Big Bang theory is, at
    least, on the right track

58
Not So Fast
  • But the Big Bang theory that we talked about is
    not perfect
  • In fact, there are some real problems with it

59
Not So Fast
  • The horizon problem
  • The flatness problem
  • The magnetic monopole problem
  • All three of these problems are resolved by our
    next topic

60
Runaway Universe
  • Inflation

61
Motivation
  • These three problem could be a nail in the coffin
    of the Big Bang unless something in the theory
    changes
  • Tweaking a theory is just part of how theories
    get better
  • This is a great example

62
A Word of Caution
  • Although it seems very likely that the Universe
    went through some type of inflationary phase, the
    exact nature of inflation is still debatable

63
A Word of Caution
  • With that in mind, lets look at the three
    problems mentioned earlier

64
The Horizon Problem
  • Take a another look at the picture of the CMB

65
(No Transcript)
66
The Horizon Problem
  • Those fluctuations are 300mK
  • The entire CMB has the same temperature to within
    one part in a million!
  • This is smootha little too smooth actually

67
The Horizon Problem
  • Information cannot travel faster than the speed
    of light
  • At the moment of recombination, certain parts of
    the Universe would have never been able to
    exchange information

68
The Horizon Problem
  • We can estimate the angular size of one of these
    regions
  • It is only 2
  • This means that only parts of the Universe with
    an angular size of 2 should have been able to
    exchange information

69
The Horizon Problem
  • But if that is true, how did every part of the
    Universe come to have almost the same
    temperature?
  • We should only see the same temperature on areas
    about 2 big!

70
The Horizon Problem
  • This is the horizon problem
  • Apparently, areas that should not have been able
    to talk to each other, did

71
The Horizon Problem is a result of the huge
differences in temperature in different parts of
the CMB.
  • True
  • False

72
The Flatness Problem
  • Our Universe appears to have W 1.000.02
  • This is an extraordinary result
  • W could have been any been anything from 0 to 8
  • It ended up being exactly the number needed for a
    flat Universe

73
The Flatness Problem
  • Scientists dont like to make us special
  • This extends to our Universe
  • Why this seemingly special value of W?

74
The Flatness Problem
  • It gets worse
  • Any slight deviation from W 1 grows as time
    goes on
  • If W 1.00 now, it must have been even closer 1
    in the early Universe

75
The Flatness Problem
  • For example, even at a late age of 300 seconds,
    W had to be at least
  • 1.0000000000000
  • Why, how could our Universe have been created so
    close to a special value?

76
The Flatness Problem
  • This is the flatness problemour Universe is too
    flat to be explained by random chance in a normal
    Big Bang model

77
Having W so close to 1 is the essence of the
Flatness Problem.
  • True
  • False

78
The Magnetic Monopole Problem
  • This is a magnet ?
  • It has a north and south pole
  • Cut it in half, and it still has a north and
    south pole

79
The Magnetic Monopole Problem
  • All magnets have both a north and south pole
  • We have never seen a magnet with only a north, or
    only a south pole
  • Such a magnet is referred to as a magnetic
    monopole

80
The Magnetic Monopole Problem
  • The problem is, in our treatment of the Big Bang,
    we actually predict that there should be lots of
    magnetic monopoles
  • Not actually usthese guys

81
The Magnetic Monopole Problem
  • This is the magnetic monopole problem
  • We see 0 of something we should lots of

82
A magnetic monopole is a very tiny magnet with
both a north and south pole.
  • True
  • False

83
The Solution
  • We can fix all these problems if we do something
    weird
  • Our baby Universe has to have a growth spurt

84
Inflation
  • Growth spurt doesnt really describe it
  • Our Universe needs to go through an era of
    exponential growth
  • In about 10-33 seconds the Universe needs to grow
    1026 times

85
Back to The Beginning
  • Lets revisit the Big Bang, and go into a little
    more detail during those first 10-32 seconds
  • Like we said, the Universe was hot

86
Back to The Beginning
  • Energies were so high, that something all
    together weird happened
  • The electromagnetic force, the nuclear strong
    force, and the nuclear weak force were joined
  • They made up one superforce

87
(No Transcript)
88
???
  • This seems worse than it is
  • Electricity and magnetism seem to be two separate
    forces at first glance
  • In fact, it is just one force, electromagnetism
  • This is an idea we are used to

89
Separation
  • As the Universe cooled, the strong force
    separated from electromagnetism and the weak
    force
  • What implications does this have?

90
Separation
  • This change would have dumped a huge amount of
    energy into the Universe
  • Can we relate this to our everyday experiences?
  • DunnoIll try

91
Separation
  • It is possible to heat water to above the boiling
    point
  • Need a smooth container
  • The water is in a highly unstable state
  • A slight disturbance is explosive

92
BOOM
  • Something like this happened in the early
    Universe
  • The Universe expanded and cooled, and was in an
    unstable state
  • When the strong force separated, it blew up the
    Universe

93
Inflation
  • This event is known as inflation
  • Really, this was the BANG in the Big Bang

94
Inflation caused the Universe to grow
  • linearly
  • exponentially
  • logarithmically

95
Inflation
  • How does this fix the three problems we discussed
    earlier?
  • Basically, by smoothing everything out

96
The Horizon Problem
  • Inflation would cause the Universe to grow faster
    than the speed of light
  • This sounds contradictorybut as long as no
    information is transferred, it is possible for
    things to travel faster than the speed of light

97
The Horizon Problem
  • More accurately, space-time grew faster than
    light
  • Space-time has no mass, so this OK

98
The Horizon Problem
  • This means a very tiny piece of space, nice and
    connected, would have grown exponentially
  • This initially tiny chunk of space would have
    been uniform

99
The Horizon Problem
  • Light would have no problem crossing this tiny
    chunk
  • Same temperature
  • Same density
  • Same laws of physics
  • -)

100
The Horizon Problem
  • In a very real way, this chunk becomes our
    Universe
  • Is there something beyond our Universe?
  • Maybe, but we could never observe it

101
The Horizon Problem
  • Inflation creates our observable Universe
  • This is the Universe that we can communicate with
  • Anything outside of it was cut off from us long
    ago

102
The Horizon Problem
  • Even though our long lost Universe was created by
    the same Big Bang, it is, for all intents and
    purposes, a separate Universe
  • Could have different laws of physics

103
The Horizon Problem
  • In this case, we expect the CMB to have the same
    temperature, and we expect the Universe to be
    uniform

104
The Horizon Problem
  • But the CMB is not perfectly uniform
  • Random quantum fluctuations would have cause very
    tiny changes in the temperature
  • These changes have a very specific signature that
    would be imprinted on the CMB

105
The Horizon Problem
  • These signatures have been observed
  • A good thing for inflation
  • In fact, it is these signatures that were used in
    our earlier simulations

106
The Horizon Problem
  • So inflation not only solves the horizon problem,
    it helps explain the CMB and growth of structure
    even better than the Big Bang alone

107
The Flatness Problem
  • Imagine the Earth
  • We know the Earth is curved
  • Does it look curved?
  • Why not?

108
The Flatness Problem
  • The Earth is big
  • On small scales, like those of our everyday
    experience, the curvature is too small to detect

109
The Flatness Problem
  • Even if the overall curvature of space is not
    flat, if the curvature is on a large enough
    scale, we would not notice it

110
The Flatness Problem
  • Inflation would have taken a very small chunk of
    the Universe and grew it
  • This small chunk must have been locally flat
  • Since this chunk grew to become the whole
    observable Universe, the whole observable
    Universe must be nearly flat

111
The Flatness Problem
  • The consequence is that the Big Bang almost
    certainly did not produce a flat Universe

112
The Flatness Problem
  • But the entire Universe, including whatever is
    beyond our observable Universe, must have a
    curvature on a scale larger than about 14 billion
    light-years

113
The Magnetic Monopole Problem
  • The Big Bang predicted lots of magnetic monopoles
  • But do we expect lots in our tiny little chunk?
  • No!

114
The Magnetic Monopole Problem
  • The chances of having one in our chunk are small
  • And so, it is natural that we dont see any

115
Summary and Pause
  • Inflation seems almost impossible to wrap your
    mind around
  • But it solves many problems that our original Big
    Bang picture had

116
Summary and Pause
  • Do I expect you to really understand it?
  • NO!!
  • But you should be aware that something like this
    seems to have happened, and it is consistent with
    what we know about physics

117
One Last Problem
  • The Big Bang still isnt perfect
  • Someone once asked, Why is there any normal
    matter? Why didnt it all get destroyed by
    antimatter?

118
One Last Problem
  • Physicists wonder about this same thing
  • For some reason, there must have been more
    particles than antiparticles
  • We do not yet know why

119
One Last Problem
  • Still this, and the other disagreements over
    inflation, the nature of dark matter, and the
    dark energy (next topic), shouldnt kill the Big
    Bang
  • Just needs a bit more tweaking

120
What Do You Think?
  • So this is how we think the Universe was created
  • I am curious to hear your thoughts

121
Fire and Ice
  • Some say the world will end in fire,Some say in
    ice.From what I've tasted of desireI hold with
    those who favor fire.But if it had to perish
    twice,I think I know enough of hateTo say that
    for destruction iceIs also greatAnd would
    suffice.
  • Robert Frost

122
Which death would you prefer?
  • Fire
  • Ice

123
The Accelerating Universe
  • The Mystery of the Dark Energy

124
Some Perspective
  • We have just journeyed through our pastwe are
    about to take a look into our future
  • We will find that our Universe is much stranger
    than we ever imagined
  • I also think the answer of How will the Universe
    end? will disappoint many you

125
The Quest for H
  • Our universe is expanding, and the rate at which
    that expansion is slowing down can tell us the
    fate of our Universe

126
The Quest for H
  • H is the rate of expansion of the Universe
  • This rate of expansion changes, so H is not
    constant for all time
  • H0 is the rate of expansion right now

127
The Quest for H
  • If the Universe is closed then the expansion will
    slow down to a halt
  • After that, the expansion turns into contraction
  • We end in a Big Crunch

128
The Big Crunch
  • A Big Crunch would be hot
  • Densities and temperatures would increase as the
    Universe shrank

129
A Cold Death
  • A flat Universe will slow down, but never quite
    stop expanding
  • It just sort of coasts, getting close to zero
    expansion

130
A Cold Death
  • In this scenario, all the stars will burn out
  • No more fusible material
  • Many particles will simply decay away
  • Light will become so scarce, as the Universe gets
    bigger ad bigger, that it will get dark

131
A Cold Death
  • It is a slow, painful death by freezing
  • Eventually, all that is left is the stray proton
    or electron, and maybe a photon here or there

132
A Cold Death
  • An open Universe is even worse
  • The expansion doesnt even get close to stopping
  • It will slow down, but never approach zero

133
Or So We Thought
  • But that was 15 years ago
  • While trying to measure the rate of deceleration,
    and thus the determine the fate of the Universe,
    astronomers found somethingstrange

134
Standard Candles?
  • Type Ia supernovae form very far away seemed
    dimmer than we expected
  • It was as if they were farther away than any of
    the above three scenarios allowed for

135
(No Transcript)
136
Standard Candles?
  • One explanation is that Type Ia supernovae are
    not good standard candles
  • But we think they are

137
The Accelerating Universe
  • The other explanation is that the Type Ia
    supernovae really are farther away than predicted
    by our naïve approach

138
The Accelerating Universe
  • What could cause the supernovae to be farther
    away?
  • The expansion of the Universe must not be slowing
    downit must be speeding up

139
Could gravity cause the expansion to accelerate?
  • Yes
  • No

140
The Dark Energy
  • But what could possibly cause the expansion to
    speed up?
  • Gravity is supposed to be the dominant force, but
    it causes collapse, not expansion

141
The Dark Energy
  • To cause the Universe to expand, we need to put
    some extra energy into the system
  • Similar to inflation
  • But where would this energy come from?

142
The Dark Energy
  • We dont know what it is, but we call it the Dark
    Energy
  • We represent it by the Greek letter L

143
The Dark Energy
  • When this discovery was made, it was fairly
    unexpected, but not unprecedented
  • Einstein invoked a similar idea

144
The Cosmological Constant
  • Einstein realized that GR predicted an expanding
    or contracting universe, but he didnt like the
    idea
  • He introduced a cosmological constant into the
    equations

145
The Cosmological Constant
  • It was called a constant because it was the same
    for all times in the history of the Universe
  • This constant was symbolized by L and
    counteracted any expansion or collapse
  • Einstein would later call this my greatest
    blunder

146
The Cosmological Constant
  • If the constant was big enough, it could actually
    increase the expansion
  • This idea was invoked and abandoned several times
    during the 20th century
  • This time, it looks like it is here to stay

147
The Dark Energy
  • We do have some good contenders for the dark
    energy
  • Perhaps the most promising is a vacuum energy

148
Vacuum Energy
  • Remember our atoms?
  • The electrons had a lowest energy level they
    could be in
  • This energy level was not zero

149
Vacuum Energy
  • We think space-time is the same way
  • On subatomic scales, we think the very fabric of
    space seethes

150
Virtual Particles
  • Particles and antiparticles seem to pop into
    existence out of nowhere, and then annihilate
    each other in tiny fractions of a second
  • Called virtual particles

151
Virtual Particles
  • Quantum mechanics allows for this as long as the
    particles are destroyed quickly
  • It is like pulling a quick one on the Universe

152
Virtual Particles
  • This quantum weirdness gives the vacuum a
    non-zero, lowest energy state
  • This is a property of the vacuumof space itself
  • Since we always have space, it would always be
    present
  • This matches up with an idea like the
    cosmological constant

153
The Casimir Effect
  • Can we detect this?
  • Yes!
  • It is called the Casimir effect

154
The Casimir Effect
  • If we place two plates together, it limits the
    vacuum energy
  • There will be more virtual particles outside of
    the two plates than between them

155
The Casimir Effect
  • This imbalance causes the plates to be pushed
    together
  • This is not gravity or electromagnetic forces
  • It is the virtual particles

156
(No Transcript)
157
(No Transcript)
158
The Casimir Effect
  • As strange as it sounds, this has been measured
    in the lab
  • It isnt too difficult

159
Which best describes the vacuum energy?
  • It is a property of space, and is the same
    everywhere
  • It is the result of a non-zero energy state
  • It creates virtual particles
  • All of the above

160
Vacuum Energy and Acceleration
  • Could the vacuum energy cause the acceleration
  • Yes, but

161
Vacuum Energy and Acceleration
  • A complete understanding of vacuum energy
    requires a theory that uses both GR and quantum
    mechanics
  • They hate each other

162
Vacuum Energy and Acceleration
  • Since we dont yet have a good theory, we have
    trouble estimating the strength of the vacuum
    energy
  • We can try, but the number we get is 1023 times
    too big!!!
  • This is the worst guess in science!

163
Vacuum Energy and Acceleration
  • If vacuum energy is the best way to describe dark
    energy, we need to do a lot more work to
    understand it
  • There is at least one other contenderdont
    understand it well

164
Got Anything Else?
  • Just relying on the Type Ia supernovae is not
    good enough for me
  • Maybe we really dont understand them
  • But there is other evidence

165
Back to Flatness
  • As mentioned earlier, we know the Universe is
    flat
  • But how?
  • The CMB

166
Back to Flatness
  • We can predict how big the angular size of all
    the different fluctuations in the CMB should be
  • Remember that the curvature affects angles

167
Back to Flatness
  • If the Universe was positively curved, the
    angular sizes would appear too big
  • If the Universe was negatively curved, the
    angular sizes would be too small
  • But they are just right

168
Back to Flatness
  • Our measurements of the CMB are some of the best
    in science
  • This is very convincing evidence that the
    Universe is indeed flat
  • But that poses a problem

169
Back to Flatness
  • Even our most optimistic measurements for the
    density of normal matter and dark matter give
  • Wnm 0.04 Wdm 0.26

170
Back to Flatness
  • This would mean that the total W is only 0.3
  • But if we live in a flat Universe, W must be 1
  • Something else must be out there that makes up
    the missing 0.7

171
Back to Flatness
  • This is the dark energy
  • Remember that both energy and mass contribute to
    curvature
  • So we think all the densities are
  • Wnm 0.04 Wdm 0.26 WL 0.7

172
Oops
  • That means we dont know what 96 of the Universe
    is
  • But we are convinced that something is out there

173
There is More
  • The growth of structure simulations we saw also
    used dark energy
  • They work pretty well
  • And attempts to measure the curvature of the
    Universe using advanced techniques involving
    gravitational lensing also support dark energy

174
(No Transcript)
175
A Cosmic Mystery
  • So even though we dont know what dark energy is,
    it seems like it is not going anywhere
  • There is hope for learning more

176
Back to H
  • Turns out that if we can measure the history of
    the Hubble parameter (the rate of expansion), we
    can at least tell which contender is on the right
    track
  • Why is H so important?

177
Back To H
  • H can tell us many, many things
  • A full history of H tells us the age of the
    Universe
  • H tells us the critical density
  • H tells us how far away things are

178
(No Transcript)
179
The Age of the Universe
  • This is how we know that the Universe is 13.7
    billion years old
  • A very well known number
  • We also know the critical density is 10-27 kg /
    m3

180
The Ultimate Fate of the Universe
  • We can now answer, with great confidence, the
    question of how our Universe will end
  • Even though it is flat, the Universe will
    continue to expand at an increasing rate due to
    dark energy
  • We are headed for a colder, darker death than we
    ever thought

181
The Ultimate Fate of the Universe
  • Stars will burn out, leaving only used up stellar
    cores
  • Eventually, neutrons may decay, releasing protons
    and electrons
  • Even the protons could decay to simpler
    particles, some day

182
The Ultimate Fate of the Universe
  • Galaxies will get farther apart, or collapse to
    form single, isolated giants
  • But these stars, too, will eventually die

183
The Ultimate Fate of the Universe
  • The Universe will become so big that photons will
    become a rarity
  • No light, no heat
  • Just infinite, cold, darkness

184
The Ultimate Fate of the Universe
  • Luckily, this fate lies in the very, very distant
    future
  • So sleep soundly

185
  • And the end of all our searching shall be to
    return to the place where we started and know it
    for the first time.
  • -T.S. Eliot

186
  • I hope that you can look back on the beginning of
    this course, and feel like you now know it for
    the first time.
  • If you walk away with a new found sense of
    appreciation, and awe, then I am happy.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com