Overview of Regional Networks of Infrastructure Regulators - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Overview of Regional Networks of Infrastructure Regulators

Description:

Study tours and exchange programs. NARUC provides support ... Travel expenses, in-kind contributions (e.g.. office and equipment for secretariat) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: elisam
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overview of Regional Networks of Infrastructure Regulators


1
Overview of Regional Networks of Infrastructure
Regulators
EAP FORUM OF INFRASTRUCTURE REGULATORS
  • Apurva SanghiSenior Economist
  • The World Bank

2
Outline
  • Three regional fora
  • History?
  • Objectives?
  • Activities?
  • Structure?
  • Funding?
  • Summary and Lessons learnt

3
Regional Networks Snapshot
4
I. South Asia Forum for Infrastructure Regulators
(SAFIR)
5
A. SAFIR History
  • Established 1999
  • World Bank and PPIAF Support
  • No legal status members comply with SAFIR
    guidelines
  • SAFIR activities guided by Steering Committee of
    experienced regulators
  • Membership also open to non-regulators

6
B. SAFIR Objectives
  • Platform for experience sharing
  • Learning events
  • Regulatory decision-making
  • Research on regulatory issues

7
C. Some SAFIR Activities
  • Annual Core Training Program on Infrastructure
    Regulation and Reform
  • 10 days full of lectures, sector-specific case
    studies, practical exercises, and panel
    discussions with utility experts
  • Special training courses
  • Newsletter
  • Web-based discussion groups

8
D. SAFIR Structure
Annual meeting
1. STEERING COMMITTEE Decision-making
body Members SA Regulatory commissions and
associations
2. CHAIRPERSON of Steering Committee
3. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Members Research
Institutes
TERI, Host Entity
9
E. SAFIR Funding
  • Annual membership fee
  • Regulatory agencies/association 1000/ 2000
  • Research Institutes 500
  • Consumer groups 250
  • Corporate associations 3000
  • Donors 10,000
  • World Bank and PPIAF support
  • Resources generated by sales of services
  • Training program generated a surplus in 2003

10
II. Africa Forum for Utility Regulation (AFUR)
11
A. AFUR History
  • Established 2000
  • Consultative Group in 2001 to shape AFUR
    structure and work program
  • Gained legal status November 2002
  • Formal constitution adopted in Pretoria (South
    Africa)
  • Membership open ONLY to regulators
  • Observer status Government officials in process
    of setting up regulatory agencies

12
B. AFUR Objectives
  • Support the development of effective regulation
    in Africa
  • Information sharing
  • Facilitate regulatory capacity building
  • Support the harmonization of policies and
    legislations
  • Promote sound relationships with governments and
    other stakeholders

13
C. Some AFUR Activities
  • 5 plenary meetings
  • Workshops
  • Consumer issues Relations with service
    providers Regulatory governance
  • Information dissemination
  • Newsletters, surveys, regulatory research,
    website
  • Training
  • Financial issues in regulation (2 courses)
  • Electricity regulation for Eastern African
    countries (1 course)

14
D. AFUR Structure
General meeting (once every 3 years)
1. GENERAL ASSEMBLY all AFUR Members (29)
Three-year term of office
2. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (8 AFUR Members)
Chair and Deputy Chair
3. SECRETARIAT National Electricity Regulator,
South Africa
15
E. AFUR Funding
  • Annual membership fee (US 2500)
  • Donor grants (World Bank, PPIAF)
  • Shifting towards a more financially
    self-sustainable model
  • Co-pay by members to attend meetings and
    workshops
  • Co-financing of secretariat costs by Chair of EC

16
III. Energy Regulators Regional Association (ERRA)
17
A. ERRA History
  • Established 1999
  • Focus on independent energy regulators from
    Central and Eastern Europe
  • Formalized December 2000
  • Constitution signed by 15 Members in Bucharest

18
B. ERRA Objectives
  • Improve energy regulation in member countries
  • Foster development of stable energy regulators
    with autonomy and authority and improve
    cooperation among energy regulators
  • Increase exchange of information, research and
    experience among members
  • Increase access to energy regulatory information
    and experience around the world
  • Promote opportunities for training

19
C. Some ERRA Activities
  • Regular meetings
  • Training program
  • Study tours and exchange programs
  • NARUC provides support
  • Database of electricity tariffs in
    Central/Eastern Europe

20
D. ERRA Structure
Annual General meeting
3. SECRETARIAT Hungarian Energy Office
Standing Committee
1. GENERAL ASSEMBLY 19 Full members 4 Associate
members
Financial Committee (3 Members)
2-year term of office
2. PRESIDIUM (7 ERRA members)
Chair and Deputy Chair
21
E. ERRA Funding
  • Annual membership fee
  • US 1500/500 for Full/Associate Members
  • ERRA Members cost-sharing
  • Travel expenses, in-kind contributions (e.g..
    office and equipment for secretariat)
  • Training courses
  • Partially funded by co-operation agreement
    between NARUC and USAID
  • No fees for ERRA Members/Fees may be charged to
    non-member organizations
  • Grant from Local Government Initiative (Soros
    Foundation, Budapest)

22
Network Models Summary
23
Network Models - Lessons Learnt Decision-making
function
  • Need high level decision-making body
  • Need day-to-day implementation of approved
    decisions
  • Need interface between above two

24
Network Models - Lessons Learnt Training program
  • If capacity building is priority, partnership
    with training provider is essential
  • ERRA Model Training provider (NARUC)
  • Associate Member
  • Works closely with regulators / secretariat
  • SAFIR Model Training provider (TERI)
  • Member of Executive Committee / Secretariat

25
Network Models - Lessons Learnt Sustainability
  • In the long-term, network must become financially
    self-sustainable
  • Limited availability of donor funds
  • Some degree of members cost-sharing required
  • Pricing activities at cost-recovery level
    essential

26
Implications for EAP Network
  • OBJECTIVES PRIORITIES?
  • ACTIVITES?
  • Is capacity building a priority?
  • __________________________________
  • STRUCTURE Organization and Membership?
  • FINANCIAL?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com