Title: Chapter 7 Chemistry of urban and indoor atmospheres
1Chapter 7Chemistry of urban and indoor
atmospheres
2WHO air quality guidelines
- Exposure concentration x time
- Concentration allowed over 8 hours will be less
than that allowed for just 1 hour - CO limit 10 mg/m3 for 8 hours
- CO limit 20 mg/m3 for 1 hour
3WHO air quality guidelines
4Air Quality in megacities (gt10 million)
- Sulfur dioxide (SO2)
- Bejing, Seoul, and Mexico City have ambient
levels of SO2 that greatly exceed WHO guidelines - Many cities restrict coal burning and dont have
a problem with SO2
5Air Quality in megacities (gt10 million)
- Suspended particulate matter (SPM)
- 150-230 mg/m3 WHO guidelines
- 200-600 mg/m3 average
- Some exceed 1000 mg/m3 at times
- Beijing, Shanghai, and Seoul particles due to
domestic heating - Beijing, Cairo, Delhi, Karachi and Mexico City
have high natural loadings of wind-blown
particles - London, New York, and Tokyo consistently met
particle guidelines
6Air Quality in megacities (gt10 million)
- Carbon monoxide (CO)
- 10 mg/m3 WHO guidelines
- Concentrations vary significantly across the city
- Large amounts of automobiles generally contribute
to higher amounts of CO, Mexico City, London, and
New York
7Air Quality in megacities (gt10 million)
- Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ozone (O3)
- Not measured as much as other pollutants
- Mexico City, Los Angeles, and Sao Paulo, have
short-term concentrations of NO2 and O3 that
exceed WHO guidelines - Mexico City had O3 at 900 mg/m3, four times the
guideline of 200 mg/m3
8Air Quality in megacities (gt10 million)
- Lead (Pb)
- Dependent on number of cars and amount of lead in
fuels - Cairo and Karachi have excessive lead levels
- Many countries have removed lead from fuels or
have plans to do so soon. - Residuals of lead in soils near roads or fueling
areas can be a problem
9Which city would be the worst to live in based on
atmospheric pollution?
10Mexico City
- Surrounded by mountains
- Little wind
- Often have temperature inversions
- Pollutants accumulate and often exceed WHO
guidelines
11Mexico City SO2
- SO2 always above WHO guidelines
- Power plants burn high sulfur (3.5 S) fuel oil
- Buses and trucks burn diesel fuel with 1.2 S
- Power plants switching to natural gas (less
sulfur)
12Mexico City suspended particles
- Particle concentrations always above WHO
guidelines - Large amount of natural particles (soil dust and
biological particles) - Domestic, industrial, and transportation
combustions also significant sources of particles.
13Mexico City CO
- CO often a problem from morning rush hour
- High altitude of city (lower pressure) makes it
more likely to have incomplete combustion - Low pressure also contributes to adverse health
effects related to CO.
14Mexico City NOx and O3
- NOx mainly from transportation.
- NOx not too much higher than WHO guidelines.
- Inversions often cause ozone problems 30 of days
have ozone levels higher than national standards - The southwest sector of city has 60 of days
where ozone levels exceed standards.
15Mexico City Pb
- Amount of lead in atmosphere peaked in 1980
- Caused by lowering amount of lead allowed in
fuels.
16Air Quality Index (AQI) in US
- CO, NO2, PM2.5, SO2, O3, and Pb measured to
determine air quality.
17AQI criteria
18AQI Health Effects
192007 AQI Data CA and MO (selected areas)
202007 PM2.5 data for selected MO and CA cities
21AQI for US areas
- Any areas of interest?
- http//www.epa.gov/air/data/geosel.html
22Indoor air quality
- People spend a lot of time indoors
- Cooking, cleaning, heating by open or contained
fires, smoking can cause changes in air quality
23Factors affecting indoor air quality
- Air outside
- If air outside is polluted (O3 as an example),
some of that air will eventually get inside. - Air exchange rate
- Some airy houses have many air exchanges per hour
- Pollutants generated inside are removed
- Very tightly insulated houses have only 0.1 0.5
air exchanges per hour - Pollutants generated inside tend to accumulate
24Air exchangers that conserve energy
25Air exchangers that conserve energy
26Factors affecting indoor air quality
- Construction materials
- Many plastics are sources of formaldehyde
- Clays are sources of radon
- Indoor activities
- Combustion for heating or cooking releases gases
and/or particles - Cooking foods releases gases and/or particles
- Smoking releases gases and/or particles
- Cleaning creates dust and releases volatile
solvents
27Sources of pollutants to indoor air
28Common indoor air contaminantsRadioactivity
- Uranium-238 (t1/2 4.5 x 109 years) and Thorium
-232 (t1/2 14 x 109 years) common in rocks and
soils - Lead to the production of radon through alpha
decay
29Common indoor air contaminantsRadioactivity
- Radon is a noble gas (t1/2 3.8 days for
radon-222) - Migrates through cracks into buildings
- Inhaled into lungs
30Common indoor air contaminantsRadioactivity
- Radon decays to polonium and ultimately to
lead-206 (which is stable) - Polonium is not a gas and will remain in lungs if
formed there - Ultimately Rn decay in lungs will lead to 3-a
particles, 4-b particles, and Pb remaining
31Common indoor air contaminantsVolatile organic
compounds
- VOCs come from construction materials, consumer
products, and combustion processes - Construction materials leading to VOC releases in
New buildings is high - Wood composites (chips and sawdust)
- Insulating foams
- Floor tiles
- Carpet
- Adhesives used in insulation
- Construction material VOCs include
- Chloroform
- Acetone
- Chlorinated compounds
- Formaldehyde
32Formaldehyde release from construction materials
decreases with time
33Formaldehyde from construction materials
- Sources of formaldehyde include resins for
plywood and particle board, fire-retardant
chemicals, color retention chemicals, some
wallpapers, and urea formaldehyde (UF) polymers - Release of formaldehyde is enhanced by
temperature and humidity
34Formaldehyde and FEMA trailers used for Hurricane
Katrina victims
- FEMA used new mobile home trailers to help
victims displaced by Hurricane Katrina - Some of these trailers had high levels of
formaldehyde emissions - http//www.sierraclub.org/gulfcoast/downloads/form
aldehyde_test.pdf - http//www.fema.gov/media/archives/2007/051807.sht
m - http//www.homelandstupidity.us/2006/08/08/formald
ehyde-in-fema-travel-trailers-making-people-sick/ - Question What did these people expect to get
from the government, old worn out homes to live
in or new temporary homes? It shouldnt be
surprising that new homes in a hot humid climate
have large VOC emissions! - Does it not occur to people that air exchange
rates are important and if people suspect they
are getting sick from the air, they should open
windows to get the bad air out!
35VOCs from Combustion
- Fuel to air ratio is important for VOC production
- CO common but hydrocarbons are also produced
- Ventilation of exhaust is important
- In many poor countries people use wood/coal fires
to cook in house with no chimney - Cigarette smoking releases aldehydes, ketones,
organic bases, organic acids, and hydrocarbons
36Common indoor air contaminantsIndoor particles
- Particles can come from combustion of fossil fuel
or biomass - Wood stoves, smoking, other heating/cooking
sources - 100 mg/m3 acceptable standard
- 4 methods of cooking tortillas studied in rural
Mexico - 1140 mg/m3 for biomass fuel in unvented house
- 330 mg/m3 for liquefied petroleum gas in unvented
house - 540 mg/m3 for unvented biomass and liquefied
petroleum gas - 430 mg/m3 for vented biomass
37Particles produced during cooking
- Environ. Sci. Technol., 38 (8), 2304 -2311, 2004.
- Source Strengths of Ultrafine and Fine Particles
Due to Cooking with a Gas Stove - Lance A. Wallace, Steven J. Emmerich, and
Cynthia Howard-Reed - Selected parts of Abstract
- Cooking, particularly frying, is an important
source of particles indoors. - The selected cooking episodes (mostly frying)
were capable of producing about 1014 particles
over the length of the cooking period (about 15
min), more than 90 of them in the ultrafine
(lt0.1 m) range - Frying produced peak numbers of particles at
about 0.06 mm. - Levels of PM2.5 were increased during cooking by
a factor of 3. - Breakfast cooking (mainly heating water for
coffee and using an electric toaster) produced
concentrations about half those produced from
more complex dinnertime cooking.
38Particles produced during cooking
- Environ. Sci. Technol., 41 (1), 99 -105, 2007
- Compositions of Fine Particulate Organic Matter
Emitted from Chinese Cooking - Yunliang Zhao, Min Hu, Sjaak Slanina, and
Yuanhang Zhang - Selected parts from Abstract
- In this study, the chemical composition of
particulate organic matter (POM) in PM2.5 emitted
from four different Chinese cooking styles were
examined by gas chromotography-mass spectrometry
(GC-MS). - The dominant homologue is fatty acids,
constituting 7385 of the quantified compounds. - The pattern of n-alkanes and the presence of
-sitosterol and levoglucosan indicate that
vegetables are consumed during Chinese cooking
operations. - The candidates of organic tracers used to
describe and distinguish emissions from Chinese
cooking in Guangzhou are tetradecanoic acid,
hexadecanoic acid, octadecanoic acid, oleic acid,
levoglucosan, mannosan, galactosan, nonanal, and
lactones. - During the sampling period, the relative
contribution of Chinese cooking to the mass
concentration of atmospheric hexadecanoic acid
should be less than 1.3 in Guangzhou.
39Common indoor air contaminantsIndoor particles
- Soil dust
- Mold
- Lead paint
- Asbestos
40Collapse of World Trade Center in 2001
- Large amount of dust/particles created during the
burning and collapse of towers
41Collapse of World Trade Center in 2001
- Dust even penetrated indoor environments of
businesses and homes.
42Collapse of World Trade Center in 2001
- Particles contained
- Asbestos
- Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
- polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
- polybrominated dipheyl ethers (PBDEs)
- polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PBDDFs)
- tetra- and pentachlorinated biphenylenes (PCBPs)
- This has created public concern because WTC dust
is thought to cause adverse pulmonary symptoms
including "WTC cough" and reduced lung capacity.
Pleil et al. 2006
43Particles from Laser printersEST
DOI10.1021/es802193nAuthor Lidia Morawska