Title: SOT optical performance Focus stability in orbit
1SOT optical performanceFocus stability in orbit
- Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team
2SOT focus design
- OTA is designed to provide collimated beam into
FPP in air, and provides a weakly converging beam
(f?200m) in vacuum. Air-to-vacuum difference of
the focus position of OTA and FPP are adjusted by
initial setting of the re-imaging lens
position. - The 4 optical paths (BFI, NFI, SP, and CT) are
designed to be kept in co-focal without any focus
adjustment.
3Focus adjustment by the re-imaging lens
- Focus shift originating in OTA and FPP can be
compensated by movement of the re-imaging lens
along the optical axis during the mission
operation. We plan to adjust the focus position
occasionally to compensate seasonal variation. - No need to adjust the position within one orbital
cycle because orbital variation is supposed to be
negligible. - Mechanisms for the motion of the re-imaging lens
have the specifications shown below.
Reimaging lens
M2
M1
4Focus shift in orbit
- Focus shift is caused by displacement of optical
elements along the optical axis. The change of
M1-M2 distance is most sensitive to the focus
shift. - Mechanical environmental (vibration and acoustic)
tests showed no significant change in focus
position. - The thermal environment in orbit is very
different from that on the ground. In order to
predict the focus shift in orbit, we performed
thermal-optical test of the telescope, and
determined the defocus sensitivity for major
components experimentally. - Focus errors (including margins) are controlled
by a focus error budget table. The focus position
is confirmed to be well within adjustable range
by the re-imaging lens for the mission period.
5Focus position in the first light phase
- After the telescope top-door is opened, the
temperatures inside the telescope increase, and
are settled within several hours. - The telescope main structure is made of CFRP
(carbon fiber reinforced plastic). The
dehydration of CFRP makes M1-M2 distance smaller
in vacuum. The speed of the shrinkage is
temperature dependent.
6Focus shift by CFRP dehydration
1 month (?) later
Just after launch
M2
M2
M1
M1
-8.3mm ? -4.2mm
?0mm
7Temperature dependence of CFRP dehydration
2nd test on May 2004 OTA temperature was kept
?20C during the test.
A20 (lambda, DP)
Time constant ? 400hrs
Time (hour)
4th test on Mar 2005 Focus position did not
change during the cold mode.
Cold mode
Hot mode
Time (hour)
8Orbital variation by temperature ripple
- The temperature prediction in orbit tells that
there is 1-2?C temperature ripple within one
orbital cycle especially around M2. - The focus shift within one orbital cycle is
expected to be around 0.2mm at the re-imaging
lens focus. This corresponds to one or two steps
of the focus adjustment, and is within focal
depth.
Temperature and focus ripple within one orbital
cycle
(Only major components are shown in the table.)
9Focus change between DC and Limb obs.
- In limb observations, heat inputs to the
telescope become smaller than those in DC obs.
This makes the temperatures 1 - 2 ?C lower. - This temperature change causes small focus shift,
but the shift is expected to be about 0.1mm, and
is negligible.
Temperature and focus change between DC and Limb
obs.
(Only major components are shown in the table.)
10Long-term focus shift
- Because of the contamination on the mirror
surface, the temperature inside the telescope
tends to increase gradually through the mission
life. - The temperature increase causes gradual focus
shift, and will be compensated by the re-imaging
lens.
Temperature and focus change through the mission
life
(Only major components are shown in the table.)
11Summary
- The orbital and DC-Limb variation are expected to
be 1-2 steps of the focus adjustment, and well
within focal depth. - We should verify orbital and DC-Limb variation in
the first light phase. - The seasonal and long-term focus shift will be
compensated by occasional adjustment of the
re-imaging lens position.