JLab Polarized Source - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

JLab Polarized Source

Description:

P. Adderley, J. Brittian, J. Clark, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, ... Q-weak 250 Hz Helicity Flip Test and the New HV Switch ... 110 VAC. Isolation Transformer ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: poel
Category:
Tags: jlab | polarized | source | vac

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: JLab Polarized Source


1
JLab Polarized Source
  • Happex Collaboration Meeting
  • May 18, 2007
  • P. Adderley, J. Brittian, J. Clark, J. Grames, J.
    Hansknecht, M. Poelker,
  • M. Stutzman, R. Suleiman, K. Surles-Law

2
Outline
  • G0 Experience Laser-Table Setup, Halls
    Cross-talk,
  • Helicity Magnets Commissioning
  • Q-weak 250 Hz Helicity Flip Test and the New HV
    Switch
  • FFB Diagnostic and Measuring Parity-Quality of
    Beam
  • Paper Conducting Parity Violation Experiments
    at CEBAF
  • Mott Polarimetry, Load-Lock Gun, and more

3
G0 Experience Laser-Table Setup and Halls
Crosstalk
4
Summary of G0 Experience
  • Pockels Cell (PC) HVs, roll, pitch, and yaw
    should be optimized using the spinning HWP and a
    scope.
  • No need to do laser work with the QPD in the
    tunnel.
  • PC x y should be optimized to minimize the
    steering with the electron beam since Jan 07,
    automated PC X Y stages were installed.
  • Use PITA and RHWP to zero the charge asymmetry
    and position differences (with the electron beam).

5
IN / PITA0
On the Laser Table
Choose x0, y90 mils
6
OUT / PITA0
On the Laser Table
Choose x70, y90 mils
7
OUT / PITA0
With the electron beam
Choose x67, y91 mils
8
  • Laser Table Setup and Pockels Cell Alignment (G0
    Experience)
  • Laser Table
  • Check laser spot is round (1mm diameter) and has
    no tails or satellites and centered on the
    Pockels Cell.
  • With the spinning HWP in front of LP, minimize
    the residual linear polarization. Find the
    optimal HV, -HV, roll, pitch, and yaw of the PC.
    Check for both IHWP IN OUT.
  • Electron Beam
  • Establish electron beam in the injector. Find the
    BPMs pedestals by doing a current scan with the
    iocses set in Gains off mode.
  • Turn OFF the PC and take a long run to check for
    electronic noise. Turn it back ON.
  • You will use IPM1I02 to finish the setup but its
    good to check IPM1I04 and IPM1I06.
  • Do an x y translational scans for both IN and
    OUT. Find PC x y that minimize the PC steering.
  • For IN, do a RHWP at PITA0 and another one at
    PITA-180 V. Find the RHWP angle that further
    minimizes the position differences and charge
    asymmetry, you will have to change the PC high
    voltage to new values. Repeat this for OUT.
  • Now for both IN and OUT you have determined PC
    x, PC y, HV, -HV, RHWP angle. The IA voltage
    should be 5 V for both IN and OUT. Over time, IN
    and OUT will drift to their own IA values.

9
361 MeV, 35 uA January LD2
10
Halls A C Cross-talk
  • Hall A IA Scan
  • Hall A IA Scan (80 uA)
  • Hall C Charge asymmetry and position differences
    during the Hall A IA Scan (20 uA)

11
  • Hall C Charge Asymmetry Width

Hall C _at_ 20 uA Hall A _at_ 90 uA
Hall C _at_ 20 uA Hall A OFF
12
Helicity Magnets Commissioning
13
(No Transcript)
14
Calibration
  • Each magnet can kick both helicity states
  • Very small coupling to charge asymmetry (100
    times smaller than PZT)
  • The position feedback is not coupled to the
    charge feedback
  • Can do position feedback on both position and
    angle in x y

15
Position Feedback Test I
  • Introduce large position differences Magnet 1
    at even DAC 500

16
  • Turn ON position feedback
  • Zero position differences at 0L05 and 0L06

17
Position Feedback Test II
  • Introduce large position differences
  • Move the Pockels Cell from its optimal
    position on the laser table

18
  • Turn ON position feedback
  • Zero position differences at 0L05 and 0L06

19
Position Feedback Test III
  • 1-day G0 Production

20
Electrical Pick-up
  • One big concern Will other elements on the
    beam-line see the helicity signal?
  • Check this with Pockels Cell OFF and Helicity
    Magnets OFF.

21
  • Turn ON magnet 1
  • Power it to 1000 times its operational value.
    Look for position differences upstream the magnet

22
  • Summary
  • Helicity Magnets can be used to do
  • position feedback
  • Some improvements are still needed
  • Increase the DAC resolution by at least a factor
    of 10.
  • Better selection of BPMs to do feedback on.

23
Commissioning of the 250 Hz Helicity Flip and the
New HV Switch
24
Changes needed to run at 250 Hz
  • New Pockels Cell HV Switch to replace the old
    switch
  • The Helicity Board is programmed for either 30 Hz
    or 250 Hz with Time-Settle of 60 us, 100 us, 200
    us, or 500 us
  • Check that tools we need still can work at 250 Hz
    and 60 us T-Settle
  • Parity DAQs
  • Mott and Moller Polarimeters
  • Helicity Magnets

Worked Fine
25
Issue I New Switch Electrical Pickup
30 Hz Flip PC OFF, new Switch
30 Hz Flip PC OFF, old Switch
26
Issue II 60 Hz Position Noise
Can 60 Hz noise be used to study the beam
envelope?
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
More 60 Hz noise search to be continued
After moving an ion-pump power supply away from
the beam-line
30
FBB Diagnostic and Measuring Parity-Quality of
Beam
  • Richard Dickson

31
The Accelerator BPM Measurement
  • Developed by Richard Dickson.
  • It uses the FFB diagnostic system to read the
    BPMs wires. Currently running on iocse9 in Hall A
    and iocse14 in Hall C. These two IOCs receive
    only the delayed helicity signal.
  • Each wire is sampled at 1800 Hz for Hall A
    (Linac style SEE BPM) each sample is 64 us long
    and consists of 8 sub-samples each 8 us. For
    Hall C (Transport style BPM) a single sample is
    taken at the 1800 Hz rate. Two seconds of data
    are acquired for each helicity state (3600
    samples). For each five second readout, one
    second is reserved for computation and output by
    EPICS.
  • For each sample
  • The 4-wires (pedestal subtracted) are added for
    all the BPMs in each feedback system (eight), and
    x y positions are calculated individually for
    each BPM
  • Data Processing
  • Data is summed for any given helicity window and
    the sum stored for later correlation with the
    delayed helicity signal. There is a dead time at
    both beginning and end of the helicity window.
    Beam trips are filtered away.
  • This results in roughly 60 samples being summed
    together in any helicity window.
  • The helicity correlated sum for a window are then
    further summed into a running total for that
    state until approx two seconds of data are
    acquired per state.
  • After completion of data acquisition, asymmetries
    and differences are computed. These are then
    available via EPICS as well as values that are
    further digitally filtered.

32
Measuring Position Differences
Helicity Magnet 1 ON /- 150 DACs
33
Results
  • Charge asymmetry and position differences agree
    to better than 10.
  • Modify the BPM software to calculate also error
    bars or RMSs.
  • Hardware and software changes to the Injector
    IOCs to be able to measure helicity correlated
    properties in the Injector (iocse11, iocse12,
    iocse19 23 BPMs) July Sept. 07

34
Paper Conducting Parity Violation Experiments
at CEBAF
35
  • Paper Idea Conducting Parity Violation
    Experiments at CEBAF.
  • Target Journal Phys Rev A or Nuclear Instr and
    Methods A or Rev of Scientific Instr.
  • First draft due by July 1st, 2007.
  • Format plain text or doc or latex I will put
    things together in Latex.
  • Figures eps format.
  • Collaboration (in no particular order, who did I
    forget?)
  • JLab Suleiman (POC), Hansknecht, Poelker,
    Grames, Chao, Kazimi, Bogacz, Dickson
  • HAPPEx Paschke (POC), Cates, Kumar, Souder,
    Michaels, Kaufman, Snyder
  • G0 Pitt (POC), Armstrong, Nakahara, Bailey
  • Topics (in no particular order, what did I
    forget?)
  • Introduction (Armstrong?)
  • Recall first parity violation experiments at
    accelerators
  • Discuss the family of recent parity violation
    experiments, what makes them different, what
    makes them possible?
  • How do we do a parity violation experiment?
  • Laser table
  • Lasers (diodes, ti-sap, fiber) (Poelker ?)

36
Mott Polarimetry, Load-Lock Gun, and more
37
  • Upgrade the 5 MeV Mott DAQ Reduce background and
    improve the statistical error bar
  • Install new 100 keV / 500 keV Mott in Injector in
    August 07
  • Load-Lock Gun will be installed in July 07 (4
    photo-cathodes)
  • Now running using fiber-lasers
  • PC HV Switches and Ground Loop Elimination
    (Hansknecht)
  • Switch Designs
  • Eliminating Ringing in Pockels Cells used in
    Parity experiments
  • Ground loop elimination for Parity experiments
  • http//www.jlab.org/accel/inj_group/laser2001/pock
    els.htm

38
G0 Cavities
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com