Session 10: From Small to Large Groups - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Session 10: From Small to Large Groups

Description:

When and why did humans develop the capacity to operate in large groups? ... A study of Xmas card distribution lists in. 43 long-suffering participants ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: mvv
Category:
Tags: groups | session | xmas

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Session 10: From Small to Large Groups


1
Session 10 From Small to Large Groups
2
Questions
  • When and why did humans develop the capacity to
    operate in large groups?
  • What are the obstacles to achieve large scale
    cooperation?
  • What mechanisms, cognitive, emotional, and
    behavioral, enable humans to bond with each other
    in large units?
  • How can we foster cooperation in modern society?

3
The Problem
4
Social brain hypothesis (Dunbar, 2003)
  • Humans have a large brain in order to cope with
    the demands of a complex social environment
    rather than the physical environment
  • If this is true then as social complexity
    increases between species we should ee an
    increase in brain power
  • How to measure social complexity?

5
Social brain hypothesis (Dunbar, 2003)
  • Brain size is an adaptation for network size
    the need to maintain bonds between ever larger
    and more complex social groups
  • Particularly increase in neocortex social
    cognition functions
  • Machiavellian intelligence ability to
    manipulate social relationships
  • Theory of Mind ability to understand that
    others also have a mind (Baron-Cohen, 1994)
  • Between species correlations between neocortex
    ratio and group size (primates, mammals)

6
The Social Brain Hypothesis
  • Group size is a function of neocortex volume
  • Neocortex ratio neocortex vol/rest of brain
  • i.e. thinking part of brain

Monkeys
Apes
7
Evolutionary analysis Why we moved away from
small kin-based groups?
  • Most social animals (including many nonhuman
    primates) live in kin groups only
  • Kin cooperation is not really a puzzle (se kin
    selection theory)
  • Genus Homo has lived in larger units for some
    time now, according to the brain data (Dunbar,
    1993) around 1.5 MYA.
  • What were the pressures to increase group size?
  • Ecological pressures dispersed resources
    (sharing waterholes, resource variability)
    fission-fusion societies (Dunbar, 2004)
  • Safety pressures (competition between rival
    groups predator avoidance) Alexander, 1979)

8
Evolutionary analysis Costs and benefits of
living in large groups
  • Benefits
  • Resource exploitation
  • Group defense
  • Costs
  • Intragroup competition (over resources)
  • Coordination problems
  • Freerider problems (avoiding and dealing with
    cheaters)

9
Solutions
  • New ways of finding partners evolution of
    (social) intelligence and theory of mind (mind
    reading)
  • Purpose to use tactical deception to find mates
    and cooperation partners
  • New ways of communication evolution of language
  • Purpose to communicate to several people at the
    same time and to people not there (symbolic
    language)
  • New ways of grooming evolution of laughter,
    music, dance, religion
  • Purpose To make larger groupings more cohesive

10
The psychological literature Predictions
  • 1. Human social network size should be around 150
    people (where everyone knows everyone)
  • Religious communities (Hutterites)
  • Aborigine groups
  • Christmas card lists

11
Human Social Network Size
  • A study of Xmas card distribution lists in
  • 43 long-suffering participants
  • Mean cards sent 68.2
  • Mean recipients 153.5
  • Mode ? 120

Mean
Hill Dunbar (2003)
12
The Expanding Circles
  • Human groupings are
  • limited by
  • frequency of
  • interaction
  • capacity for
  • emotional closeness

Intensity
5
15
35
80
150
13
Predictions
  • 2. Cooperation should decrease with group size
  • Overwhelming evidence (Marwell Schmitt, 1972)
  • Kerr (1989) found that people feel their
    contribution does not matter once groups become
    too large

14
Predictions
  • 3. Communication enables people to solve social
    dilemmas
  • - Dawes, McTavish, Shaklee (1977)

15
Communication and cooperation
16
Predictions
  • 4. People should be able to identify with and
    sacrifice for large groups
  • Literature on organizational (Ellemers et al.,
    1998) and national loyalty (Stern, 1995)
  • Social movement participation (Simon et al.,
    1998)
  • Community identification and water conservation
    (Van Vugt, 2001)

17
Community identification predicts water
conservation during a drought (Van Vugt, 2001)
18
Prediction Laughter increases bonding in groups
  • 5. Our recent study

19
Cooperation in modern society
  • Use the social brain and work-around the
    limitations of it
  • Turn large units into smaller groupings that
    people can more easily identify with
  • Have charismatic leaders that can mobilize the
    masses (leaders with personal qualities)
  • Promote gossip and information exchange so that
    people are concerned about their reputations
    (media)
  • Have systems in place to punish and ostracize
    cheaters

20
Take-home message
  • Humans have the capacity to function in large
    groups
  • This is made possible by a number of cognitive
    and affective evolved mechanisms unique to
    humans
  • Theory of mind
  • Language
  • Laughter, identification
  • Culture (?)
  • To sustain cooperation in our large, complex
    society requires us to use the social brain
    optimally and work around its limitations

21
Summary of module
  • Take a particular group-related behaviour
  • Ask yourself what the proximate functions of this
    behaviour are when do people show it, how and
    why do they show it?
  • Ask yourself what the ultimate function of this
    behaviour is did it yield selective advantages
    in our evolutionary past or is it a recent
    cultural phenomenon?
  • Use information from both the evolutionary and
    social psychology perspectives to getter a better
    picture
  • If the group behaviour is a problem suggest
    realistic solutions that take into account the
    evolutionary basis of the behaviour

22
Evaluation of module
  • What did you learn from this course?
  • What did you think of Ridleys book?
  • Which session did you enjoy most?
  • Which session did you enjoy least?
  • How can this course be improved?

23
Sessions
  • 1 Why humans live in groups
  • 2 The puzzle of human altruism
  • 3 Reputations matter
  • 4 Status, conformity and obedience
  • 5 Dominance or leadership?
  • 6 The nature of group cohesion
  • 7 Aggression within groups
  • 8 Aggression between groups
  • 9 Group performance and decision-making
  • 10 Group size

24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Evolution of religion (Discussion)
  • What is religion?
  • What are the main aspects of religion?
  • Are there any adaptive benefits to religious
    beliefs?
  • If so, which are they? Individual-level or
    group-level benefits
  • If not how did religion emerge? (byproduct
    hypothesis)
  • What are the ultimate and proximate functions of
    religion?
  • What are the cognitive capacities needed to get
    religious beliefs? (evolutionary history)
  • Can modern humans do without religion?

27
Functions of religion
  • Coping with uncertainty (naive scientific
    beliefs)
  • Group cohesion and solidarity (supernatural
    punishment Johnson, 2005)
  • Self-control
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com