Title: Total Rainfall
1- Environmental Impacts of Conversion of Cropland
- to Short-Rotation Woody Crops
2(No Transcript)
3Monthly Rainfall
4Total Rainfall
5Runoff Totals
Runoff Fraction
6Short Rotation Woody CropSycamore Height
4 ft
5 ft
8 ft
8 ft
8 ft
7Short Rotation Woody Crop
Sycamore DBH and Volume
8SRWC Fertilization
9No-till Corn Fertilization
10Runoff Nitrate
11Leaf Litter Analysis
12Runoff Ammonium
13Runoff Phosphorous
14(No Transcript)
15Percolation Totals
16Lysimeter Nitrate
17(No Transcript)
18Sedimentation in Flumes
19Double Ring Infiltration
20Double Ring Infiltration
21Average Green Weights
22(No Transcript)
23Biomass - Dry WeightEnd of 5th Growing Season
- 28,572 kg/ha
- (12.7 tons/ac)
- aboveground
- 11,519 kg/ha
- (5.1 tons/ac)
- belowground
24Coppice versus Seedlings
25(No Transcript)
26Coppice versus Seedlings
150 lb/acre NH4NO3
27Comparison of Root Systems
28Woody Crops as an Energy Source
- Biofuels
- Agricultural and mill residues
- Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and
short-rotation woody crops - Woody bioenergy crops
- Poplar (Populus), willow (Salix), American
sycamore (Platanus occidentalis L.) - Two- to twelve-year rotation lengths
- Co-fired with coal in power plants
29Bioenergy Crops and Row Crops
- Bioenergy crops on agricultural land
- Diversified income for farmers (Walsh et al.,
1998) - Soils improved under bioenergy crops (Tolbert et
al., 2000) - Woody crop / row crop rotation
30Objectives
- Determine the feasibility of following a woody
crop with a row crop - Measure the effect of a woody crop on subsequent
row crop yields and responses to N fertilizer - Document the effects of a woody crop rotation on
soil C and N
31Study Site
- Ames Plantation
- Loess belt
- 137 cm precipitation
- Soils
- Memphis-Loring silt
- loam intergrade
- Fine-silty, mixed, active, thermic Typic
Hapludalf Fine-silty, mixed, active, thermic
Oxyaquic Fragiudalf
from www.amesplantation.org
32Treatments
- Cropping sequence
- Soybean gt 4-yr sycamore gt corn
- Soybean gt 5-yr sycamore gt corn
- Soybean gt corn
- Rate of N fertilizer applied to corn
- Broadcast ammonium nitrate
- 0, 73, 146, 219 kg N ha-1
- Soil depth (0 to 30 cm)
- Distance from stump (5 to 150 cm)
- Time
33Plot Layout
5-yr sycamore (1995-1999)
15 m
4-yr sycamore (1995-1998)
12 m
Road
Continuous row crops (Soybean through 1998)
34Dependent Variables
- Sycamore dry biomass yield
- Sycamore stump C, N, density
- Corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield
- Soil total C, N, and inorganic N
- LECO CNS-2000 (LECO Corp., St. Joseph, MI)
- Modified indophenol blue method (Sims et al.,
1995)
35Experimental Design
- Completely-randomized design
- Cropping treatment and N rate analyzed as
factorial - Analysis of Variance
- Fishers Least Significant Difference
- Single degree-of-freedom contrasts
- P lt 0.05
- Regression
- Linear and quadratic responses
36Sycamore Biomass Yield
30
25
20
15
Dry biomass (Mg ha-1)
10
A
A
5
0
4-year
4-year
5-year
5-year
Annual mean
Entire rotation
37Stump Wood Density
1.0
0.8
0.6
A
A
Density (g cm-3)
0.4
B
0.2
0.0
0
52
104
Weeks After Harvest
38(No Transcript)
39Stump C and N Concentrations
10
600
A
A
B
500
B
8
B
400
6
Total C (g kg-1)
Total N (g kg-1)
300
4
200
C
2
100
0
0
0
104
52
52
104
0
Weeks After Harvest
Weeks After Harvest
40(No Transcript)
41Corn Grain Yield
2000
1999
4.0
7
3.5
6
A
A
3.0
5
A
2.5
AB
4
Yield (Mg ha-1)
Yield (Mg ha-1)
2.0
B
3
1.5
2
1.0
1
0.5
0.0
0
Corn after soybean
1st-yr corn after sycamore
2nd-yr corn after sycamore
1st-yr corn after sycamore
Corn after soybean
Note Fertilizer applied at 146 kg N ha-1.
42Corn Grain Yield, 1999
8
1st-yr corn after soybean
7
1st-yr corn after sycamore
6
2
R
0.90
2
5
R
0.57
Yield (Mg ha-1)
4
3
2
1
0
0
219
73
146
N fertilizer (kg N ha-1)
43Corn Grain Yield, 2000
4
3
2
Yield (Mg ha-1)
1
0
0
219
73
146
N fertilizer (kg N ha-1)
44Corn Grain Yield, 2001
12
10
8
Yield (Mg ha-1)
6
4
2
0
0
219
73
146
N fertilizer (kg N ha-1)
45(No Transcript)
46Soil Total C Concentration, 1999
0-2.5
2.5-7.5
Soil depth (cm)
7.5-15
5 cm from stump
15-30
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Total C (g kg-1)
Note Contrasts compare stump to row crop
treatments.
47Soil Total C Concentration (0-30 cm)
10
8
6
Total C (g kg-1)
4
37.5 cm from stump
2
5 cm from stump
Continuous row crops
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Weeks after sycamore harvest
Note Contrasts compare soil 5 and 37.5 cm from
stumps to soil under continuous row crops.
Fertilizer applied at 146 kg N ha-1.
48Soil C Concentration (0-30 cm)
134 Weeks After Sycamore Harvest
8
6
4
Total C (g kg-1)
2
0
150
5
37.5
75
Continuous row crops
Distance from stump (cm)
Note Contrast compares soil at four distances
from stumps to soil under continuous row
crops. Fertilizer applied at 146 kg N ha-1.
49Soil Total N Concentration, 1999
0-2.5
2.5-7.5
NS
Soil depth (cm)
7.5-15
5 cm from stump
15-30
NS
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Total N (g kg-1)
Note Contrasts compare stump to row crop
treatments.
50Soil Inorganic N Concentration (0 to 30 cm) in
June, 1999
50
Continuous row crops
5 cm from stump
NS
40
37.5 cm from stump
NS
30
NO3- and NH4 (mg kg-1)
NS
20
NS
10
0
219
0
146
73
-1
N fertilizer (kg N ha
)
Note Contrasts compare stump to row crop
treatments at each N rate.
51Conclusions
- No mechanical limitations
- Nitrogen immobilized in stumps
- Nitrogen fertilization may need to be increased
for corn following a woody crop - Soil C concentration increased by sycamore