Partisan Realignments in the US Schofield et al. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Partisan Realignments in the US Schofield et al.

Description:

Why was the 2004 election the mirror image of the 1896 election? ... 97(2) May 2003, and CRITICAL ELECTIONS AND POLITICAL REALIGNMENTS IN THE USA: 1860-2000 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Ange7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Partisan Realignments in the US Schofield et al.


1
Partisan Realignments in the US (Schofield et al.)
2
Two questions
  • Is politics one-dimensional? (i.e., is a
    Liberal-Conservative dimension sufficient?)
  • Do you think that there is a good account of how
    electoral realignments in American politics
    actually occur?

3
Partisan Realignments in the US
  • Party realignments have long fascinated scholars
    of American politics
  • However, no simple model has captured how these
    phenomena actually occur
  • Until now

4
Political Map of the US in 1896McKinley
(Republican) vs. Bryan (Democrat)
5
Political Map of the US in 2004George Bush
(Republican) vs. John Kerry (Democrat)
6
(No Transcript)
7
1896 vs. 2004
  • Red states turn blue, and vice versa
  • How did this happen?
  • Why did this happen?
  • Schofield et al. politics is two-dimensional!

8
American politics is two-dimensional
  • Economic dimension
  • Social dimension

9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
1896 vs. 2004
  • Why was the 2004 election the mirror image of the
    1896 election?
  • Significant constituencies must have deserted
    each party, switching their allegiances

16
Most likely candidates?
  • Populists (D ? R)
  • Cosmopolitans (R ? D)
  • Look at survey data see if it supports this

17
Evidence?
  • Populists working-class, socially conservative
    voters
  • Cosmopolitans middle-class, socially liberal
    voters

18
Operationalization
  • Populists individuals in the 16th percentile or
    below on annual income who oppose abortion
    regardless of circumstances
  • Cosmopolitans individuals in the 68th percentile
    or above on annual income who support abortion

19
Democratic vote, 1970s-2000s
20
Conclusion?
  • Data shows that in recent years populists moved
    away from the Democratic Party toward the
    Republican Party
  • Also shows a movement of cosmopolitans in the
    opposite direction (R ? D)

21
Additional resources
  • Note if you are interested in finding more about
    this topic, see Norman Schofields papers at
    http//schofield.wustl.edu/schofieldpapers.html
  • Especially  ACTIVISTS AND PARTISAN REALIGNMENT IN
    THE UNITED STATES American Political Science
    Review, 97(2) May 2003, and CRITICAL ELECTIONS
    AND POLITICAL REALIGNMENTS IN THE USA 1860-2000
    Political Studies, Vol 51, 217-240 2003
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com