Hg Monitoring Options and Requirements - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Hg Monitoring Options and Requirements

Description:

Appendix K Sorbent Trap systems consist of a pair of sampling trains that ... Run time for other methods to be determined by the amount of sampling needed to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: matthe93
Learn more at: https://www.epa.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hg Monitoring Options and Requirements


1
Hg Monitoring Options and Requirements
  • Region 7
  • Kansas City
  • August 2007
  • Charles Frushour
  • USEPA, CAMD

2
Hg Monitoring Options
  • CEMS
  • Sorbent Trap Appendix K
  • Hg LME

3
Hg CEMS
  • Initial Certification
  • 7-day calibration error test
  • Linearity Check (elemental Hg)
  • 3-level System Integrity Check (oxidized
    Hg)monitors with Hg converter only
  • Cycle Time Test
  • RATA
  • Bias Test

4
Hg CEMS
  • On-going Quality Assurance
  • Daily calibration error test (elemental or
    oxidized Hg)
  • Weekly 1-level System Integrity Check
  • Required when daily calibrations use elemental Hg
    for monitors with Hg converters
  • Weekly 168 operating hours
  • Quarterly Linearity Check (elemental Hg) or
    3-level System Integrity Check (oxidized Hg)
  • Required for each QA operating quarter
  • Annual RATA (no semi-annual threshold)
  • Bias Test

5
Calibration Tests
  • The initial 7-day calibration error test and
    subsequent Daily calibrations may be conducted
    using either elemental Hg or a NIST-traceable
    source of oxidized Hg.
  • Specification 5.0 of span value with alt
    spec of 1.0 µg/scm absolute difference
  • The form of Hg used for daily calibrations will
    need to be reported in the Monitoring Plan so
    that EPA can track whether Weekly System
    Integrity Checks are required.
  • The monitoring plan may be updated as needed

6
Weekly System Integrity Check
  • One point version of the 3-level System Integrity
    Check required for initial certification of Hg
    monitors with an Hg converter.
  • Required only if daily calibrations are performed
    using elemental Hg and the monitor uses an Hg
    converter to monitor total mercury.
  • Required once every 168 unit/stack operating
    hours.
  • Specification 10.0 of reference value with
    alt spec of 0.8 µg/scm absolute difference

7
Linearity Check
  • Linearity Checks are performed with an elemental
    Hg standard
  • Required for initial certification of all Hg
    monitors
  • Required for quarterly QA unless a 3-level System
    Integrity Check is substituted
  • Specification 10.0 of reference value with
    alt spec of 0.8 µg/scm absolute difference

8
3-level System Integrity Check
  • System Integrity Checks are performed with an
    oxidized Hg standard generated from a
    NIST-traceable source
  • Required for initial certification of Hg monitors
    with Hg converters
  • 3-level System Integrity Check may be used
    instead of a linearity for Quarterly QA.
  • Specification 10.0 of reference value with
    alt spec of 0.8 µg/scm absolute difference

9
Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)
  • Required for initial certification of all Hg
    monitors
  • Required annually (once every 4 QA operating
    quarters) thereafter
  • For Reference Methods that require paired
    sampling, the RM value for each run should be the
    average of the values observed from each of the
    paired samples for the run.
  • Specification 20.0 RA with alt spec of
    1.0 µg/scm if average RM value is 5.0 µg/scm
  • No semi-annual threshold

10
Bias Test
  • Use standard bias test logic
  • Low Emitter BAF cap is 1.250 for when the average
    RM concentration is lt 5.0 µg/scm

11
Appendix K Sorbent Trap System Basics
  • Appendix K Sorbent Trap systems consist of a
    pair of sampling trains that collect an
    integrated sample over a specified collection
    period
  • Sorbent traps collect the Hg and have 3 sections.
  • Section 1 Main Sample Collection Section
  • Section 2 Breakthrough Sample Collection Section
  • Section 2 Spiked Section for QA
  • Each sampling train uses a dry gas meter to
    record the volume of stack gas sampled over the
    course of each sample collection period

Note Agency plans to revise Appendix K in the
upcoming OAQPS direct-final alternative mercury
reference method rule package to allow the use of
any type of gas flow meter that accurately
measures gas volumes within 2 percent. This is
consistent with our performance-based measurement
policy.
12
Appendix K Sorbent Trap Systems
  • Initial Certification
  • RATA
  • Bias Test
  • Initial 3-level Dry Gas Meter Calibrations
  • Initial DGM Temperature Sensor and Calibration
    Check
  • Initial DGM Barometer Calibration Check
  • Gas meter calibration procedures are being
    revised as part of the alternative reference
    method rule package.

13
Appendix K Sorbent Trap Systems
  • On-going Quality Assurance for Appendix K systems
    and components
  • Annual RATA (no semi-annual threshold)
  • Annual Bias Test
  • Quarterly Gas Meter Calibrations
  • Quarterly Gas Meter Temperature Sensor and
    Calibration Check
  • Quarterly Gas Meter Barometer Calibration Check
  • Quality Assurance for each Appendix K sample
    collection period
  • Pre- and Post- sample collection Leak Check
  • Monitor Ratio of stack gas flow to sample
    collection flow
  • Sorbent Trap Breakthrough check (section 2 of
    trap)
  • Percent Trap Agreement
  • Spike Recovery (section 3 of trap)
  • Gas meter calibration procedures are being
    revised as part of the alternative reference
    method rule package.

14
Appendix K Sample QA
  • The following QA is applicable to each sample
    collection period for evaluating the
    acceptability of each sorbent trap sample
    collected
  • If any of the following QA checks are failed, the
    sample for that trap is invalidated.
  • If data for the other trap is validated, a single
    trap adjustment factor may be used to adjust the
    data from that trap for uncertainty in lieu of
    applying substitute data for the collection
    period.
  • If the QA checks are failed for both samples then
    substitute data must be used for the entire
    collection period.

15
Appendix K Sample QA
  • Each sampling train must pass a pre- and post
    sample collection leak check. The post
    collection check will be reported to validate
    each sample
  • The Ratio of the hourly Stack Gas Flow Rate to
    the hourly Sample Flow Rate must be maintained to
    within 25 of the initial ratio from the first
    hour of each collection period. Samples are
    invalidated if more than either 5 hours or 5 of
    the hourly ratios do not meet this criteria.
  • Sorbent Trap Breakthrough check (section 2 of
    trap) The mass of Hg captured on section 2 of
    the trap must be 5 of the total Hg collected
    on section 1.
  • Spike Recovery (section 3 of trap) The analysis
    of Hg on section 3 must result in 75 - 125 of
    the spike referenced spike level for the trap.

16
Appendix K Calculating the Collection Period
Concentration
  • The Hg concentration for each trap sample is
    calculated by adding the Hg mass from section 1
    and section 2 of the trap.
  • There are plans to remove the procedure to
    normalize the Hg mass in the upcoming reference
    method rule package.
  • Percent Trap Agreement For each pair of traps,
    the Relative Deviation (RD) must be 10.
    (Alternate Specification 20 if average Hg
    concentration is 1.0µg/scm)
  • If the Percent Trap Agreement is within spec.,
    the average Hg concentration is reported for each
    hour of the collection period
  • If the Percent Trap Agreement is not within
    spec., the higher of the two Hg concentrations is
    reported for each hour of the collection period

17
Substitute Data for CEMS and Appendix K
  • In August 2006, EPA proposed to consolidate the
    Substitute Data requirements for CEMS and
    Appendix K.
  • This decision allows for the use of an Appendix K
    system as a back-up to CEMS in a way that does
    not complicate the Substitute Data requirements
    for when neither system is available.
  • For hours where there is valid data from the
    CEMS, that data will be used to populate the
    lookback. This is also the value that must be
    used to calculate Hg mass for the hour.
  • The Appendix K data will populate the lookback
    period for any hour where CEMS data are
    unavailable.
  • For hours where neither system is available,
    substitute data is determined from the
    consolidated lookback of actual concentration
    data used for the previous hourly emissions
    calculations.

18
Substitute Data for CEMS and Appendix K
  • The substitute data for Hg has four tiers
  • Tier 1 If the PMA is 90 or more
  • If the duration of the outage is less than 24 hrs
    substitute the average of the hour before and
    after
  • If the duration is greater than 24 hrs,
    substitute the higher of the hour before/hour
    after average or the 90th percentile value from a
    720 hour lookback
  • Tier 2 If the PMA is less than 90 and equal to
    80 or more
  • If the duration of the outage is less than 8 hrs
    substitute the average of the hour before and
    after
  • If the duration is greater than 8 hrs, substitute
    the higher of the hour before/hour after average
    or the 95th percentile value from a 720 hour
    lookback

19
Substitute Data for CEMS and Appendix K
  • Tier 3 If the PMA is less than 80 and equal to
    70 or more, substitute the maximum value from the
    720 hour lookback
  • Tier 4 If the PMA is less than 70 substitute the
    maximum potential concentration.
  • For units with add-on controls, if the controls
    are documented to be operated properly per
    75.34, the unit may substitute the greater of
    the following instead of the maximum potential
    concentration
  • The maximum expected concentration as listed in
    the monitoring plan, or
  • 1.25 times the maximum controlled value measured
    from the previous 720 hour lookback

20
Hg-LME Monitoring Methodology
  • Rather than install Hg analyzers or sorbent
    traps, affected units with lower potential levels
    of Hg may qualify for an excepted monitoring
    methodology
  • This method is referred to as the Hg-LME
    methodology
  • The Hg-LME excepted methodology is found in 75.81

21
Hg LME
  • Low Hg emitting units ( 29 lbs/yr potential
    emissions) may qualify for the Hg-LME methodology
  • This methodology requires an initial and on-going
    emission testing
  • Initial test stack test results are used in Eq.
    1, with the maximum potential stack flow rate to
    demonstrate that the units potential to emit is
    not greater than the 29 lb threshold.
  • The Hg concentration from the test is then used
    with actual stack flow data to determine hourly
    emissions
  • Ongoing retesting is required annually if the
    calculated potential Hg emissions are 9 lb/yr,
    and semiannually if the potential emissions are
    between 9 and 29 lb/yr (NO GRACE PERIODS!)
  • Actual reported Hg mass is used for ongoing
    qualification.

22
Hg-LME Testing
  • A minimum of 3 runs at normal load are required
  • Minimum run time is 1 hour per run is required
    for the instrumental method
  • Run time for other methods to be determined by
    the amount of sampling needed to acquire a
    measurable amount of Hg
  • Use the highest Hg concentration from the 3 runs
    or 0.50 µg/scm (whichever is greater) in when
    calculating the potential to emit
  • The same default is used for hourly reporting
    until the completion of the next test.

23
Hg LME
  • Equation 1 in 75.81 provides the conservative
    estimate of the annual Hg mass emissions from the
    unit (i.e., potential to emit)
  • Equation 1 is also used to determine whether
    ongoing test should be performed semi-annually or
    annually
  • Equation 1 uses the Hg concentration determined
    based on reference method testing consisting of
    three runs

24
Hg LME
  • Equation 1 E 8760 K CHg Qmax
  • E Estimated annual Hg mass emissions from
    the affected unit,
    (ounces/year)
  • K Units conversion constant, 9.978 x 10-10
    oz-scm/µg-scf
  • 8760 Number of hours in a year
  • CHg The highest Hg concentration (µg/scm) from
    any of the test runs or 0.50
    µg/scm, whichever is
    greater (paired sampling trains are required for
    each test run)
  • Qmax Maximum potential flow rate, determined
    according to section 2.1.4.1 of
    appendix A to this part, (scfh)
  • Considering allowing less than 8760 hours if a
    permit condition restricts hours of operation to
    less than 8760

25
Hg LME
  • On August 22, 2006 EPA proposed revisions to 40
    CFR 75 and 72.2
  • Proposed revisions include the following
    requirements
  • Coal combusted during testing must be from the
    same source of supply as the coal combusted at
    the start of the Hg mass emissions reduction
    program
  • Test a subset of identical units in accordance
    with 75.19(c)(1)(iv)(B) in lieu of testing each
    unit individually
  • The calculated value of E shall be divided by the
    number of units sharing the stack. If the
    result, when rounded to the nearest ounce, does
    not exceed 464 ounces, the units qualify to use
    the low mass emission methodology
  • Common Stack testing to be allowed with
    conditions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com