Title: Regulating and Licensing Commercial Space Transportation
1Regulating and Licensing Commercial Space
Transportation
2Purpose
- Discuss how the Federal Aviation Administrations
Office of Commercial Space Transportation
(FAA/AST) regulates and licenses launch and
reentry operations. - Background
- Statutory Authority
- FAA/AST History
- Licensing and Safety Inspection Overview
- Commercial Space Transportation Regulations
- Commercial Human Space Flight and the Way Ahead
3BackgroundStatutory Authority and
FAA/AST History
4Statutory Authority
- 49 U. S. C. Subtitle IX, ch. 701
- Authorizes the FAA to license commercial launch
and reentry activities and the operation of
launch and reentry sites as carried out by U.S.
citizens or within the United States. - Directs the FAA to
- Exercise this responsibility consistent with
public health and safety, safety of property, and
the national security and foreign policy
interests of the United States, and - Encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial
space launches and reentries by the private
sector. - The Secretary of Transportations
licensing authority has been delegated to the
Administrator of the FAA and further assigned to
the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space
Transportation (AST).
5FAA/AST History
- 1982 - First Non-Federal Launch Occurred
- 1984 - Executive Order 12465 and Commercial Space
Launch Act (CSLA)
establishing DOT Office of Commercial Space
Transportation (OCST) - 1988 - First Launch License Issued
- 1988 - Amendment to CSLA Instituted Financial
Responsibility Regime - 1989 - First Commercial Launch
- 1995 - OCST Transfers to the FAA as a New Line of
Business - 1996 - First Launch Site Operator License Issued
6FAA/AST History (cont.)
- 1998 - Commercial Space Act of 1998 Extended
Licensing Authority to Reentries
and Operation of Reentry Sites - 2000 - Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) and Reentry
Licensing Final Rule Issued - 2004 - First RLV Mission License Issued
- 2004 - First Commercial RLV Launch
- 2004 - Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of
2004, Extended Authority For
Commercial Human Space Flight and Created
Experimental Permit Regime - 2006 First Experimental Permit Issued and First
Launch Under an Experimental - Permit
- 2006 Human Space Flight Final Rule Issued
- 2007 Experimental Permit Final Rule Issued
7Licensing and Safety Inspection Overview
8Who Must Obtain A License
- An entity must obtain a license
- To launch a launch vehicle from the United
States - To operate a launch site within the United
States - To reenter a reentry vehicle in the United
States or - To operate a reentry site within the United
States. - A U.S. citizen or an entity organized under the
laws of the United States or any State must
obtain a license - To launch a launch vehicle outside the United
States - To operate a launch site outside of the United
States - To reenter a reentry vehicle outside of the
United States or - To operate a reentry site outside of the United
States. - AST does not license launches by and for the
government (e.g., DoD and NASA) or operation of a
Federal launch site.
9Operations Licensed and Regulated By FAA/AST
Air launch
Launch and reentry sites
Sea launch
Reusable Launch Vehicles and Human Space Flight
Suborbitals
Ground launch
10U.S. SpaceportsCommercial and Government Active
and Proposed Launch Sites
Kodiak Launch Complex
Chugwater Spaceport
Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport
California Spaceport
Mojave Airport
Wallops Flight Facility
Key U.S. Federal Launch Site Non-Federal
FAA-Licensed Launch Site Proposed Non-Federal
Launch Site Sole Site Operator (FAA
license or permit)
Oklahoma Spaceport
Spaceport America
Edwards AFB
Vandenberg AFB
Cecil Field Spaceport
White Sands Missile Range
- Kennedy Space
- Center
- Cape Canaveral
- Air Force Station
Blue Origin Launch site
Spaceport Florida
Sea Launch Platform Equatorial Pacific Ocean
Reagan Test Site Kwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands
Other spaceports have been proposed by Alabama,
Washington, Hawaii, Wisconsin and multiple
locations in Texas.
FAA/AST October 2008
11Types of Licenses
- Launch License (for Expendable Launch Vehicles).
- Launch-specific license authorizes a specific
launch or multiple launches with nearly identical
parameters (vehicle design, launch location,
trajectory, payload, etc.). - Launch Operator license authorizes launches of a
range of payloads and trajectories for a family
of vehicles from the same site. - Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) Mission Licenses.
- Mission-specific license authorizes a licensee to
launch and reenter one model (may authorize more
than one RLV mission, but identifies each
flight). - Operator license authorizes a licensee to launch
and reenter any of a designated family of RLVs
within authorized parameters, including launch
sites and trajectories, transporting specified
classes of payloads to any reentry site or other
location designated in the license. - Reentry Licenses.
- Reentry-specific license.
- Reentry-operator license.
- Launch or Reentry Site Operator License.
- Authorizes operation of a launch or reentry site.
12Launch Reentry Licensing Process Flow
Policy Review
Pre-application Consultation
Payload Review
Financial Responsibility Determination
License Determination
Application
Environmental Determination
Safety Review
13License Determination
- AST will initially screen an application to
determine if it is complete enough to start its
review. - AST reviews and makes a decision on an
application within 180 days of receiving an
accepted license application. - Evaluation of license application is documented
in an internal AST technical evaluation, which is
the basis for a licensing determination.
14Pre-application Consultation
- Encompasses discussions with prospective
applicant prior to submittal of a license
application. - Allows a prospective applicant to familiarize AST
with its proposal and AST to familiarize
prospective applicant with licensing process and
type of information required in an application. - Provides prospective applicant with an
opportunity to discuss issues and identify any
unique aspects of its proposal, and develop a
schedule for submitting an application.
15Policy Review
- Determines whether a proposed launch or reentry
operation or operation of a launch or reentry
site presents any issues affecting U.S. national
security or foreign policy interests, or
international obligations of the United States - A major element of the policy review is the
interagency review, which allows government
agencies to examine the proposed mission from
their unique perspectives - Department of Defense
- Department of State
- NASA
- FCC NOAA (for informational purposes only)
16Payload Review
- Determines if a payload proposed for launch or
reentry would jeopardize public health and
safety, safety of property, U.S. national
security or foreign policy interests, or
international obligations of the United States. - Does not apply to payloads that are under the
jurisdiction of any other government agency (e.g.
FCC, NOAA, etc.). - Includes an interagency review.
17Financial Responsibility Determination
- AST conducts a Maximum Probable Loss (MPL)
analysis to determine the amounts of financial
responsibility required of the licensee to cover - Pre-flight (third party)
- Pre-flight (government property)
- Flight (third party)
- Flight (government property)
- Third parties are considered
- Government workers and their contractors, and
- Persons who are not involved with the launch.
- Proof of financial responsibility required by
licensee is usually fulfilled by purchase of
liability insurance. - Subject to appropriations, U.S. Government may
pay successful third-party liability claims in
excess of required MPL-based insurance (up to
1.5 billion).
18Environmental Review
- Analyzes the environmental effects associated
with the proposed operations - Often begins prior to the formal license
application review process because it is
typically a long-lead item. - Licensing launches and reentries and operation of
launch and reentry sites is considered a Major
Federal Action and is therefore subject to the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
19Safety Review
- Determines whether an applicant is capable of
safely launching a launch vehicle and its payload
or reentering a reentry vehicle and its payload. - Involves technical analyses
- Quantitative analyses focus on the reliability
and functions of safety-critical systems, and the
hazards associated with the hardware, and the
risk those hazards pose to public property and
individuals near the launch site, along the
flight path, and upon reentry - Qualitative analyses focus on the organizational
attributes of the applicant such as launch safety
policies and procedures, communications,
qualifications of key individuals, and critical
internal and external interfaces
20Safety ReviewRisk and Expected Casualty
- Risk is defined by the safety community as the
product of the probability of occurrence of an
event and the consequences of that event - Expected casualty is used in the space
transportation industry as a measure of risk to
public safety - Expected casualty is the expected average number
of casualties per mission - Casualty is a fatality or serious injury
- ECi ? Pi ? ACi ? PDi
- Where
- i denotes each specific overflight or impact
population center - Pi probability of occurrence of ith event
- AC casualty area of impacting debris
- PD population density of area at risk
- EC will be the sum for all values of (i)
21Risk Computation
22 Public Risk Criteria
- Collective and individual risk criteria must
be met under a license. - Risk level to collective members of the public
exposed to vehicle debris impact hazards must not
exceed an expected average of 0.00003 casualties
per mission (EC lt 30 ? 10-6 ) - Risk level to an individual member of the public
must not exceed 1 ? 10-6 per mission. -
23Typical Difference Between Expendable and
Reusable Launch Vehicles
- Expendable Launch Vehicles (ELVs) typically are
launched over unpopulated ocean areas and rely
upon a flight termination system that assures
safe flight by destroying a vehicle travelling
beyond preapproved boundaries. - In contrast, Reusable Launch Vehicles (RLVs)
would be designed for recovery and reuse such
that launch safety, for the most part, may be
assured through non-destructive means of
terminating flight (e.g., land at an abort site). - Some RLVs may have crew and space flight
participants on board.
24RLV Public SafetyThree-pronged approach
- Licensing of RLV missions uses a
three-pronged approach to address public safety
by interrelating three elements so that together
risks are sufficiently contained at an acceptable
level.
25Compliance Monitoring Safety Inspections
- FAA/AST performs compliance monitoring for
licensed or permitted activities to ensure
compliance with - Statute
- Regulations
- Representations made in a license or permit
application - Terms and conditions of a license or permit
- Some compliance monitoring activities take place
at a site by the licensee or permit recipient for
manufacturing or launching. This monitoring may
include an on-site safety inspection of hardware,
tests, processes, or procedures.
26Commercial Space Transportation
Regulations
27Commercial Space Transportation Regulations
- Part 400Basis and Scope
- Part 401Organization and Definitions
- Part 404Regulations and Licensing Requirements
- Part 405Investigations and Enforcement
- Part 406Investigations, Enforcement, and
Administrative Review - Part 413License Application Procedures
- Part 414Safety Approvals
- Part 415Launch License
- Part 417Launch Safety
28Commercial Space Transportation Regulations
(cont.)
- Part 420License to Operate a Launch Site
- Part 431Launch and Reentry of a Reusable Launch
Vehicle (RLV) - Part 433License to Operate a Reentry Site
- Part 435Reentry of a Reentry Vehicle Other than
a Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) - Part 437Experimental Permits
- Part 440Financial Responsibility
- Part 460Human Space Flight Requirements
29Commercial Human Space Flight and the
Way Ahead
30Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004
(CSLAA)
- Made the FAA responsible for regulating
commercial human space flight. - Established an informed risk and consent regime
for carrying crew and space flight participants. - Required a phased approach to regulating
commercial human space flight so that regulatory
standards governing human space flight evolve as
the industry matures. - Established an experimental permit regime for
developmental reusable suborbital rockets for - Research and development
- Showing compliance with requirements for a
license or - Crew training prior to obtaining a license.
31CSLAA (cont.)
- CSLAA legislative history suggested that an
experimental permit should be granted - More quickly and with fewer requirements than a
license, and be more like an aircraft special
airworthiness certificate in the experimental
category. - Under an experimental permit, no property or
human being may be carried for compensation or
hire on a reusable suborbital rocket.
32Human Space Flight Requirements
- In accordance with the CSLAA, the FAA/AST issued
regulations where crew and space flight
participants (SFP) may be on board a launch or
reentry vehicle if - Crew has received training and has satisfied
medical requirements. - Crew and SFP have been informed that the U.S.
Government has not certified the launch vehicle
as safe for carrying crew or SFPs. - - SFP has been informed about launch or reentry
risks. - SFP has provided written informed consent to
participate in the mission. - Crew and SFP have executed a reciprocal waiver of
claims with the federal government.
33The Way Ahead
- Development of commercial human space flight
(HSF) as a new segment of the aerospace industry
is underway. - Although HSF regulations have been issued, the
FAA continues to plan for the future and be
proactive in the following areas - Research and development
- Strategic planning and identification of future
rulemaking needs - Development of advisory circulars, guidance
documents and - Assessment of issues to ensure that the FAA/AST
keeps pace with the HSF industry. - Regulations will continue to evolve to keep pace
with industry as it develops beyond suborbital
space tourism and moves toward point-to-point
travel and orbital human space flight.
34Conclusion
- Public safety is the FAA/ASTs primary mission
objective. - FAA/AST regulations have progressed over the
years as the commercial space transportation
industry continues to change, grow, and develop. - Performance-based rather than design-based
regulations have been developed to accommodate
new technology and operations in the future. - FAA/AST and industry are both learning and
working together as new launch vehicle concepts
and operations emerge.
35Conclusion (cont.)
- Challenges and issues still remain but there is
now less regulatory uncertainty in the area of
commercial human space flight due to the FAA's
establishment of a regulatory framework. - FAA/AST has been able to regulate and license
commercial space transportation in a growing and
dynamic environment by - Proactively anticipating and addressing future
issues - Planning for the future and
- Engaging industry and other agencies or
organizations.