Regulating and Licensing Commercial Space Transportation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Regulating and Licensing Commercial Space Transportation

Description:

Discuss how the Federal Aviation Administration's Office of Commercial Space ... like an aircraft special airworthiness certificate in the experimental category. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:209
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: kwo89
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regulating and Licensing Commercial Space Transportation


1
Regulating and Licensing Commercial Space
Transportation

2
Purpose
  • Discuss how the Federal Aviation Administrations
    Office of Commercial Space Transportation
    (FAA/AST) regulates and licenses launch and
    reentry operations.
  • Background
  • Statutory Authority
  • FAA/AST History
  • Licensing and Safety Inspection Overview
  • Commercial Space Transportation Regulations
  • Commercial Human Space Flight and the Way Ahead

3
BackgroundStatutory Authority and
FAA/AST History
4
Statutory Authority
  • 49 U. S. C. Subtitle IX, ch. 701
  • Authorizes the FAA to license commercial launch
    and reentry activities and the operation of
    launch and reentry sites as carried out by U.S.
    citizens or within the United States.
  • Directs the FAA to
  • Exercise this responsibility consistent with
    public health and safety, safety of property, and
    the national security and foreign policy
    interests of the United States, and
  • Encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial
    space launches and reentries by the private
    sector.
  • The Secretary of Transportations
    licensing authority has been delegated to the
    Administrator of the FAA and further assigned to
    the Associate Administrator for Commercial Space
    Transportation (AST).

5
FAA/AST History
  • 1982 - First Non-Federal Launch Occurred
  • 1984 - Executive Order 12465 and Commercial Space
    Launch Act (CSLA)
    establishing DOT Office of Commercial Space
    Transportation (OCST)
  • 1988 - First Launch License Issued
  • 1988 - Amendment to CSLA Instituted Financial
    Responsibility Regime
  • 1989 - First Commercial Launch
  • 1995 - OCST Transfers to the FAA as a New Line of
    Business
  • 1996 - First Launch Site Operator License Issued

6
FAA/AST History (cont.)
  • 1998 - Commercial Space Act of 1998 Extended
    Licensing Authority to Reentries
    and Operation of Reentry Sites
  • 2000 - Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) and Reentry
    Licensing Final Rule Issued
  • 2004 - First RLV Mission License Issued
  • 2004 - First Commercial RLV Launch
  • 2004 - Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of
    2004, Extended Authority For
    Commercial Human Space Flight and Created
    Experimental Permit Regime
  • 2006 First Experimental Permit Issued and First
    Launch Under an Experimental
  • Permit
  • 2006 Human Space Flight Final Rule Issued
  • 2007 Experimental Permit Final Rule Issued

7
Licensing and Safety Inspection Overview
8
Who Must Obtain A License
  • An entity must obtain a license
  • To launch a launch vehicle from the United
    States
  • To operate a launch site within the United
    States
  • To reenter a reentry vehicle in the United
    States or
  • To operate a reentry site within the United
    States.
  • A U.S. citizen or an entity organized under the
    laws of the United States or any State must
    obtain a license
  • To launch a launch vehicle outside the United
    States
  • To operate a launch site outside of the United
    States
  • To reenter a reentry vehicle outside of the
    United States or
  • To operate a reentry site outside of the United
    States.
  • AST does not license launches by and for the
    government (e.g., DoD and NASA) or operation of a
    Federal launch site.

9
Operations Licensed and Regulated By FAA/AST
Air launch
Launch and reentry sites
Sea launch
Reusable Launch Vehicles and Human Space Flight
Suborbitals
Ground launch
10
U.S. SpaceportsCommercial and Government Active
and Proposed Launch Sites

Kodiak Launch Complex
Chugwater Spaceport

Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport
California Spaceport


Mojave Airport
Wallops Flight Facility
Key U.S. Federal Launch Site Non-Federal
FAA-Licensed Launch Site Proposed Non-Federal
Launch Site Sole Site Operator (FAA
license or permit)
Oklahoma Spaceport



Spaceport America


Edwards AFB


Vandenberg AFB
Cecil Field Spaceport



White Sands Missile Range


  • Kennedy Space
  • Center
  • Cape Canaveral
  • Air Force Station




Blue Origin Launch site
Spaceport Florida
Sea Launch Platform Equatorial Pacific Ocean
Reagan Test Site Kwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands
Other spaceports have been proposed by Alabama,
Washington, Hawaii, Wisconsin and multiple
locations in Texas.
FAA/AST October 2008
11
Types of Licenses
  • Launch License (for Expendable Launch Vehicles).
  • Launch-specific license authorizes a specific
    launch or multiple launches with nearly identical
    parameters (vehicle design, launch location,
    trajectory, payload, etc.).
  • Launch Operator license authorizes launches of a
    range of payloads and trajectories for a family
    of vehicles from the same site.
  • Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) Mission Licenses.
  • Mission-specific license authorizes a licensee to
    launch and reenter one model (may authorize more
    than one RLV mission, but identifies each
    flight).
  • Operator license authorizes a licensee to launch
    and reenter any of a designated family of RLVs
    within authorized parameters, including launch
    sites and trajectories, transporting specified
    classes of payloads to any reentry site or other
    location designated in the license.
  • Reentry Licenses.
  • Reentry-specific license.
  • Reentry-operator license.
  • Launch or Reentry Site Operator License.
  • Authorizes operation of a launch or reentry site.

12
Launch Reentry Licensing Process Flow
Policy Review
Pre-application Consultation
Payload Review
Financial Responsibility Determination
License Determination
Application
Environmental Determination
Safety Review
13
License Determination
  • AST will initially screen an application to
    determine if it is complete enough to start its
    review.
  • AST reviews and makes a decision on an
    application within 180 days of receiving an
    accepted license application.
  • Evaluation of license application is documented
    in an internal AST technical evaluation, which is
    the basis for a licensing determination.

14
Pre-application Consultation
  • Encompasses discussions with prospective
    applicant prior to submittal of a license
    application.
  • Allows a prospective applicant to familiarize AST
    with its proposal and AST to familiarize
    prospective applicant with licensing process and
    type of information required in an application.
  • Provides prospective applicant with an
    opportunity to discuss issues and identify any
    unique aspects of its proposal, and develop a
    schedule for submitting an application.

15
Policy Review
  • Determines whether a proposed launch or reentry
    operation or operation of a launch or reentry
    site presents any issues affecting U.S. national
    security or foreign policy interests, or
    international obligations of the United States
  • A major element of the policy review is the
    interagency review, which allows government
    agencies to examine the proposed mission from
    their unique perspectives
  • Department of Defense
  • Department of State
  • NASA
  • FCC NOAA (for informational purposes only)

16
Payload Review
  • Determines if a payload proposed for launch or
    reentry would jeopardize public health and
    safety, safety of property, U.S. national
    security or foreign policy interests, or
    international obligations of the United States.
  • Does not apply to payloads that are under the
    jurisdiction of any other government agency (e.g.
    FCC, NOAA, etc.).
  • Includes an interagency review.

17
Financial Responsibility Determination
  • AST conducts a Maximum Probable Loss (MPL)
    analysis to determine the amounts of financial
    responsibility required of the licensee to cover
  • Pre-flight (third party)
  • Pre-flight (government property)
  • Flight (third party)
  • Flight (government property)
  • Third parties are considered
  • Government workers and their contractors, and
  • Persons who are not involved with the launch.
  • Proof of financial responsibility required by
    licensee is usually fulfilled by purchase of
    liability insurance.
  • Subject to appropriations, U.S. Government may
    pay successful third-party liability claims in
    excess of required MPL-based insurance (up to
    1.5 billion).

18
Environmental Review
  • Analyzes the environmental effects associated
    with the proposed operations
  • Often begins prior to the formal license
    application review process because it is
    typically a long-lead item.
  • Licensing launches and reentries and operation of
    launch and reentry sites is considered a Major
    Federal Action and is therefore subject to the
    National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

19
Safety Review
  • Determines whether an applicant is capable of
    safely launching a launch vehicle and its payload
    or reentering a reentry vehicle and its payload.
  • Involves technical analyses
  • Quantitative analyses focus on the reliability
    and functions of safety-critical systems, and the
    hazards associated with the hardware, and the
    risk those hazards pose to public property and
    individuals near the launch site, along the
    flight path, and upon reentry
  • Qualitative analyses focus on the organizational
    attributes of the applicant such as launch safety
    policies and procedures, communications,
    qualifications of key individuals, and critical
    internal and external interfaces

20
Safety ReviewRisk and Expected Casualty
  • Risk is defined by the safety community as the
    product of the probability of occurrence of an
    event and the consequences of that event
  • Expected casualty is used in the space
    transportation industry as a measure of risk to
    public safety
  • Expected casualty is the expected average number
    of casualties per mission
  • Casualty is a fatality or serious injury
  • ECi ? Pi ? ACi ? PDi
  • Where
  • i denotes each specific overflight or impact
    population center
  • Pi probability of occurrence of ith event
  • AC casualty area of impacting debris
  • PD population density of area at risk
  • EC will be the sum for all values of (i)

21
Risk Computation
22
Public Risk Criteria
  • Collective and individual risk criteria must
    be met under a license.
  • Risk level to collective members of the public
    exposed to vehicle debris impact hazards must not
    exceed an expected average of 0.00003 casualties
    per mission (EC lt 30 ? 10-6 )
  • Risk level to an individual member of the public
    must not exceed 1 ? 10-6 per mission.

23
Typical Difference Between Expendable and
Reusable Launch Vehicles
  • Expendable Launch Vehicles (ELVs) typically are
    launched over unpopulated ocean areas and rely
    upon a flight termination system that assures
    safe flight by destroying a vehicle travelling
    beyond preapproved boundaries.
  • In contrast, Reusable Launch Vehicles (RLVs)
    would be designed for recovery and reuse such
    that launch safety, for the most part, may be
    assured through non-destructive means of
    terminating flight (e.g., land at an abort site).
  • Some RLVs may have crew and space flight
    participants on board.

24
RLV Public SafetyThree-pronged approach
  • Licensing of RLV missions uses a
    three-pronged approach to address public safety
    by interrelating three elements so that together
    risks are sufficiently contained at an acceptable
    level.

25
Compliance Monitoring Safety Inspections
  • FAA/AST performs compliance monitoring for
    licensed or permitted activities to ensure
    compliance with
  • Statute
  • Regulations
  • Representations made in a license or permit
    application
  • Terms and conditions of a license or permit
  • Some compliance monitoring activities take place
    at a site by the licensee or permit recipient for
    manufacturing or launching. This monitoring may
    include an on-site safety inspection of hardware,
    tests, processes, or procedures.

26
Commercial Space Transportation
Regulations
27
Commercial Space Transportation Regulations
  • Part 400Basis and Scope
  • Part 401Organization and Definitions
  • Part 404Regulations and Licensing Requirements
  • Part 405Investigations and Enforcement
  • Part 406Investigations, Enforcement, and

    Administrative Review
  • Part 413License Application Procedures
  • Part 414Safety Approvals
  • Part 415Launch License
  • Part 417Launch Safety

28
Commercial Space Transportation Regulations
(cont.)
  • Part 420License to Operate a Launch Site
  • Part 431Launch and Reentry of a Reusable Launch
    Vehicle (RLV)
  • Part 433License to Operate a Reentry Site
  • Part 435Reentry of a Reentry Vehicle Other than
    a Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV)
  • Part 437Experimental Permits
  • Part 440Financial Responsibility
  • Part 460Human Space Flight Requirements

29
Commercial Human Space Flight and the
Way Ahead
30
Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004
(CSLAA)
  • Made the FAA responsible for regulating
    commercial human space flight.
  • Established an informed risk and consent regime
    for carrying crew and space flight participants.
  • Required a phased approach to regulating
    commercial human space flight so that regulatory
    standards governing human space flight evolve as
    the industry matures.
  • Established an experimental permit regime for
    developmental reusable suborbital rockets for
  • Research and development
  • Showing compliance with requirements for a
    license or
  • Crew training prior to obtaining a license.

31
CSLAA (cont.)
  • CSLAA legislative history suggested that an
    experimental permit should be granted
  • More quickly and with fewer requirements than a
    license, and be more like an aircraft special
    airworthiness certificate in the experimental
    category.
  • Under an experimental permit, no property or
    human being may be carried for compensation or
    hire on a reusable suborbital rocket.

32
Human Space Flight Requirements
  • In accordance with the CSLAA, the FAA/AST issued
    regulations where crew and space flight
    participants (SFP) may be on board a launch or
    reentry vehicle if
  • Crew has received training and has satisfied
    medical requirements.
  • Crew and SFP have been informed that the U.S.
    Government has not certified the launch vehicle
    as safe for carrying crew or SFPs.
  • - SFP has been informed about launch or reentry
    risks.
  • SFP has provided written informed consent to
    participate in the mission.
  • Crew and SFP have executed a reciprocal waiver of
    claims with the federal government.

33
The Way Ahead
  • Development of commercial human space flight
    (HSF) as a new segment of the aerospace industry
    is underway.
  • Although HSF regulations have been issued, the
    FAA continues to plan for the future and be
    proactive in the following areas
  • Research and development
  • Strategic planning and identification of future
    rulemaking needs
  • Development of advisory circulars, guidance
    documents and
  • Assessment of issues to ensure that the FAA/AST
    keeps pace with the HSF industry.
  • Regulations will continue to evolve to keep pace
    with industry as it develops beyond suborbital
    space tourism and moves toward point-to-point
    travel and orbital human space flight.

34
Conclusion
  • Public safety is the FAA/ASTs primary mission
    objective.
  • FAA/AST regulations have progressed over the
    years as the commercial space transportation
    industry continues to change, grow, and develop.
  • Performance-based rather than design-based
    regulations have been developed to accommodate
    new technology and operations in the future.
  • FAA/AST and industry are both learning and
    working together as new launch vehicle concepts
    and operations emerge.

35
Conclusion (cont.)
  • Challenges and issues still remain but there is
    now less regulatory uncertainty in the area of
    commercial human space flight due to the FAA's
    establishment of a regulatory framework.
  • FAA/AST has been able to regulate and license
    commercial space transportation in a growing and
    dynamic environment by
  • Proactively anticipating and addressing future
    issues
  • Planning for the future and
  • Engaging industry and other agencies or
    organizations.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com